Article

Barriers to conducting effective obstetric audit in Ifakara: a qualitative assessment in an under-resourced setting in Tanzania.

 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Saint Francis Designated District Hospital, Ifakara, Tanzania  Department of Medical Humanities, EMGO+ Institute, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands  Tanzanian Training Centre for International Health, Ifakara, Tanzania  Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands  Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo Research and Training Centre, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.
Tropical Medicine & International Health (Impact Factor: 2.94). 04/2012; 17(5):652-657. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.02972.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Objective  To explore barriers to and solutions for effective implementation of obstetric audit at Saint Francis Designated District Hospital in Ifakara, Tanzania, where audit results have been disappointing 2 years after its introduction. Methods  Qualitative study involving participative observation of audit sessions, followed by 23 in-depth interviews with health workers and managers. Knowledge and perceptions of audit were assessed and suggestions for improvement of the audit process explored. Results  During the observational period, audit sessions were held irregularly and only when the head of department of obstetrics and gynaecology was available. Cases with evident substandard care factors were audited. In-depth interviews revealed inadequate knowledge of the purpose of audit, despite the fact that participants regarded obstetric audit as a potentially useful tool. Insufficient staff commitment, managerial support and human and material resources were mentioned as reasons for weak involvement of health workers and poor implementation of recommendations resulting from audit. Suggestions for improvement included enhancing feedback to all staff and managers to attend sessions and assist with the effectuation of audit recommendations. Conclusion  Obstetric staff in Ifakara see audit as an important tool for quality improvement. They recognise, however, that in their own situation, insufficient staff commitment and poor managerial support are barriers to successful implementation. They suggested training in concept and principles of audit as well as strengthening feedback of audit outcomes, to achieve structural health care improvements through audit.

1 Bookmark
 · 
101 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Maternal death auditing is widely used to ascertain in-depth information on the clinical, social, cultural, and other contributing factors that result in a maternal death. As the 2015 deadline for Millennium Development Goal 5 of reducing maternal mortality by three quarters between 1990 and 2015 draws near, this information becomes even more critical for informing intensified maternal mortality reduction strategies. Studies using maternal death audit methodologies are widely available, but few discuss the challenges in their implementation. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the methodological issues that arose while conducting maternal death review research in Lilongwe, Malawi. Critical reflections were based on a recently conducted maternal mortality study in Lilongwe, Malawi in which a facility-based maternal death review approach was used. The five-step maternal mortality surveillance cycle provided the framework for discussion. The steps included: 1) identification of cases, 2) data collection, 3) data analysis, 4) recommendations, and 5) evaluation. Challenges experienced were related to the first three steps of the surveillance cycle. They included: 1) identification of cases: conflicting maternal death numbers, and missing medical charts, 2) data collection: poor record keeping, poor quality of documentation, difficulties in identifying and locating appropriate healthcare workers for interviews, the potential introduction of bias through the use of an interpreter, and difficulties with locating family and community members and recall bias; and 3) data analysis: determining the causes of death and clinical diagnoses. Conducting facility-based maternal death reviews for the purpose of research has several challenges. This paper illustrated that performing such an activity, particularly the data collection phase, was not as easy as conveyed in international guidelines and in published studies. However, these challenges are not insurmountable. If they are anticipated and proper steps are taken in advance, they can be avoided or their effects minimized.
    BMC Medical Research Methodology 02/2014; 14(1):29. · 2.21 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Brazilian Network for the Surveillance of Severe Maternal Morbidity was developed in Brazil with the participation of 27 centers in different regions of the country. The objective of the network project was to evaluate the frequency of severe maternal morbidity (near-miss and potentially life-threatening conditions) and the factors involved with these clinical conditions. Over the data collection period, this project implemented a surveillance system to identify these cases in the participating institutions. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the perspective of the professionals who participated in this network regarding the surveillance of cases of severe maternal morbidity, the facilities and difficulties encountered in involving colleagues in the process, and participants' proposals to give continuity to this practice of qualifying maternal healthcare. A descriptive study with a qualitative approach was conducted in which coordinators, investigators and managers at all the 27 obstetric units participating in the network were interviewed. Data were collected at 6 and 12 months after implementation of the network during semi-structured telephone interviews that were recorded following verbal informed consent. Thematic content analysis was performed of the responses to the open questions in the interviews. In the opinion of 60% of the participants, involving their colleagues in the surveillance process proved difficult, principally because these professionals were not very interested in the network project, but also because they found it difficult to review concepts and professional practices, because they had an excessive workload or due to operational and technical difficulties. The great majority considered that support from government agencies providing financial resources would be crucial to enable surveillance to be maintained or expanded and also to train a larger number of professionals and improve work conditions. The majority of participants found it difficult to define the ideal time interval at which surveillance should be conducted. The investigators, coordinators and managers involved in the Brazilian network project mentioned several problems that had to be confronted during this process; however, in their opinion the project should be maintained and even expanded in view of its potential to contribute towards improving obstetric care.
    Reproductive Health 04/2014; 11(1):29. · 1.31 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
31 Downloads
Available from
May 31, 2014