Article

Inferring gene regulatory networks by ANOVA.

Department of Informatics, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Amalienstr. 17, 80333 Munich, Germany.
Bioinformatics (impact factor: 5.47). 03/2012; 28(10):1376-82. DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts143 pp.1376-82
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT MOTIVATION: To improve the understanding of molecular regulation events, various approaches have been developed for deducing gene regulatory networks from mRNA expression data. RESULTS: We present a new score for network inference, η(2), that is derived from an analysis of variance. Candidate transcription factor:target gene (TF:TG) relationships are assumed more likely if the expression of TF and TG are mutually dependent in at least a subset of the examined experiments. We evaluate this dependency by η(2), a non-parametric, non-linear correlation coefficient. It is fast, easy to apply and does not require the discretization of the input data. In the recent DREAM5 blind assessment, the arguably most comprehensive evaluation of inference methods, our approach based on η(2) was rated the best performer on real expression compendia. It also performs better than methods tested in other recently published comparative assessments. About half of our predicted novel predictions are true interactions as estimated from qPCR experiments performed for DREAM5. Conclusions: The score η(2) has a number of interesting features that enable the efficient detection of gene regulatory interactions. For most experimental setups, it is an interesting alternative to other measures of dependency such as Pearson's correlation or mutual information.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
12 Views

Keywords

arguably
 
deducing gene regulatory networks
 
discretization
 
experimental setups
 
gene regulatory interactions
 
inference methods
 
interesting alternative
 
interesting features
 
mRNA expression data
 
mutual information
 
new score
 
Pearson's correlation
 
predicted novel predictions
 
published comparative assessments
 
real expression compendia
 
recent DREAM5 blind assessment
 
various approaches