Article

Commentary: A Call to Action to Secure the Future of Pediatric Psychology-Resonating to the Points of Rozensky and Janicke (2012)

Clinical Child Psychology Program, University of Kansas, 1000 Sunnyside Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
Journal of Pediatric Psychology (Impact Factor: 2.91). 03/2012; 37(4):369-75. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jss053
Source: PubMed
2 Followers
 · 
66 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite an early interest in pediatrics among psychologists and a natural partnership between psychology and pediatrics, psychologists' impact on services for children in primary care settings could be much greater than it is. The purpose of this article is to describe the special contributions of pediatric psychologists and pediatricians in the development of comprehensive, integrated systems of health care for children; the importance of health behavior change as a preventive measure in the lives of children and adolescents; and how psychologists, through their leadership in clinical, research, and advocacy efforts, can harness the important resources of family relationships to promote the health of children. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).
    American Psychologist 05/2014; 69(4):332-43. DOI:10.1037/a0036046 · 6.87 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Changes in the health care system and payment plans will likely require pediatric psychologists to illustrate the impact of their services. Cost-effectiveness analyses are one method of demonstrating the potential economic benefits of our services but are rarely used by pediatric psychologists. A hypothetical cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted, comparing the costs and outcomes between a behavioral adherence intervention and no intervention for youth with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Results illustrate how pediatric psychologists can use cost-effectiveness analyses to demonstrate the economic impact of their work. Efforts to conduct economic analyses could allow pediatric psychologists to advocate for their services. Implications and future directions are discussed.
    Journal of Pediatric Psychology 04/2014; DOI:10.1093/jpepsy/jsu019 · 2.91 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To provide a historical analysis of professional growth and the legacy of early challenges to the development of the field of pediatric psychology. Method More than 40 years of professional experience and consideration of published work provided the basis for this article. Results Challenges to the future of pediatric psychology that date back to the origins of the field include foundational challenges involving medical authority and administrative control as well as models of medical practice in pediatric hospital settings. These influences limited opportunities for program leadership and independent funding of clinical services, constrained interorganizational organization, and led to an underemphasis of prevention and primary care in clinical practice, research, and training. Conclusion Transformative future growth in pediatric psychology will necessitate innovative strategies that address continuing professional challenges with roots in the field’s early history.
    Journal of Pediatric Psychology 10/2014; 40(2). DOI:10.1093/jpepsy/jsu090 · 2.91 Impact Factor