Article

Replication fork polarity gradients revealed by megabase-sized U-shaped replication timing domains in human cell lines.

Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
PLoS Computational Biology (Impact Factor: 4.87). 04/2012; 8(4):e1002443. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002443
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In higher eukaryotes, replication program specification in different cell types remains to be fully understood. We show for seven human cell lines that about half of the genome is divided in domains that display a characteristic U-shaped replication timing profile with early initiation zones at borders and late replication at centers. Significant overlap is observed between U-domains of different cell lines and also with germline replication domains exhibiting a N-shaped nucleotide compositional skew. From the demonstration that the average fork polarity is directly reflected by both the compositional skew and the derivative of the replication timing profile, we argue that the fact that this derivative displays a N-shape in U-domains sustains the existence of large-scale gradients of replication fork polarity in somatic and germline cells. Analysis of chromatin interaction (Hi-C) and chromatin marker data reveals that U-domains correspond to high-order chromatin structural units. We discuss possible models for replication origin activation within U/N-domains. The compartmentalization of the genome into replication U/N-domains provides new insights on the organization of the replication program in the human genome.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
93 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The metazoan genome is replicated in precise cell lineage-specific temporal order. However, the mechanism controlling this orchestrated process is poorly understood as no molecular mechanisms have been identified that actively regulate the firing sequence of genome replication. Here, we develop a mechanistic model of genome replication capable of predicting, with accuracy rivaling experimental repeats, observed empirical replication timing program in humans. In our model, replication is initiated in an uncoordinated (time-stochastic) manner at well-defined sites. The model contains, in addition to the choice of the genomic landmark that localizes initiation, only a single adjustable parameter of direct biological relevance: the number of replication forks. We find that DNase-hypersensitive sites are optimal and independent determinants of DNA replication initiation. We demonstrate that the DNA replication timing program in human cells is a robust emergent phenomenon that, by its very nature, does not require a regulatory mechanism determining a proper replication initiation firing sequence.
    Molecular Systems Biology 03/2014; 10(3). · 11.34 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The duplication of mammalian genomes is under the control of a spatiotemporal program that orchestrates the positioning and the timing of firing of replication origins. The molecular mechanisms coordinating the activation of about [Formula: see text] predicted origins remain poorly understood, partly due to the intrinsic rarity of replication bubbles, making it difficult to purify short nascent strands (SNS). The precise identification of origins based on the high-throughput sequencing of SNS constitutes a new methodological challenge. We propose a new statistical method with a controlled resolution, adapted to the detection of replication origins from SNS data. We detected an average of 80,000 replication origins in different cell lines. To evaluate the consistency between different protocols, we compared SNS detections with bubble trapping detections. This comparison demonstrated a good agreement between genome-wide methods, with 65% of SNS-detected origins validated by bubble trapping, and 44% of bubble trapping origins validated by SNS origins, when compared at the same resolution. We investigated the interplay between the spatial and the temporal programs of replication at fine scales. We show that most of the origins detected in regions replicated in early S phase are shared by all the cell lines investigated whereas cell-type-specific origins tend to be replicated in late S phase. We shed a new light on the key role of CpG islands, by showing that 80% of the origins associated with CGIs are constitutive. Our results further show that at least 76% of CGIs are origins of replication. The analysis of associations with chromatin marks at different timing of cell division revealed new potential epigenetic regulators driving the spatiotemporal activity of replication origins. We highlight the potential role of H4K20me1 and H3K27me3, the coupling of which is correlated with increased efficiency of replication origins, clearly identifying those marks as potential key regulators of replication origins.
    PLoS Genetics 05/2014; 10(5):e1004282. · 8.52 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Replication origins are where pre-replication complexes are assembled during G1 phase. However, only a subset of the origins is actually "fired" to initiate DNA synthesis during S phase. Whereas factors involved in these steps are relatively well understood now, the mechanisms behind the origin specification, the choice of origins to be fired and determination of their timing are still under active investigation. Recent data show that the origin positions as well as the selection of those to be fired may be determined by multiple factors including sequences, chromatin context, epigenetic information, and some specific genomic features, but that the choice is surprisingly plastic and opportunistic. Timing regulation of firing, on the other hand, appears to be related to cell type-specific intrinsic chromatin architecture in nuclei. The conserved Rif1 protein appears to be a major global regulator of the genome-wide replication timing. Replication timing is regulated also by other factors including checkpoint signals, local chromatin structures, timing and quantity of pre-RC formation, and availability of limiting initiation factors.
    Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 04/2014; · 6.20 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
32 Downloads
Available from
May 22, 2014