Analgosedation: A Paradigm Shift in Intensive Care Unit Sedation Practice

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Annals of Pharmacotherapy (Impact Factor: 2.06). 04/2012; 46(4):530-40. DOI: 10.1345/aph.1Q525
Source: PubMed


To critically evaluate the use of analgosedation in the management of agitation in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients.
Literature was accessed through MEDLINE (1948-November 2011) and Cochrane Library (2011, issue 1) using the terms analgosedation, analgosedation, or analgesia-based sedation alone or in combination with intensive care unit or critically ill. Reference lists of related publications were also reviewed.
All articles published in English were evaluated. Randomized controlled trials examining critically ill mechanically ventilated patients older than 18 years were included.
Limitations of current sedation practices include serious adverse drug events, prolonged mechanical ventilation time, and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. Studies have demonstrated that analgosedation, a strategy that manages patient pain and discomfort first, before providing sedative therapy, results in improved patient outcomes compared to standard sedative-hypnotic regimens. Nine randomized controlled trials comparing remifentanil-based analgosedation to other commonly used agents (fentanyl, midazolam, morphine, and propofol) for ICU sedation and 1 trial comparing morphine to daily sedation interruption with propofol or midazolam were reviewed. Remifentanil is an ideal agent for analgosedation due to its easy titratability and organ-independent metabolism. When compared to sedative-hypnotic regimens, remifentanil-based regimens were associated with shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, more rapid weaning from the ventilator, and shorter ICU length of stay. Compared to fentanyl-based regimens, remifentanil had similar efficacy with the exception of increased pain requirements upon remifentanil discontinuation. Analgosedation was well tolerated, with no significant differences in hemodynamic stability compared to sedative-hypnotic regimens.
Analgosedation is an efficacious and well-tolerated approach to management of ICU sedation with improved patient outcomes compared to sedative-hypnotic approaches. Additional well-designed trials are warranted to clarify the role of analgosedation in the management of ICU sedation, including trials with nonopioid analgesics.

Download full-text


Available from: Sandeep Devabhakthuni,
741 Reads
  • Source
    • "This is true for all but the sickest patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome [10], and others with severe, uncontrolled obstructive airways disease, cardiogenic shock, status epilepticus, elevated intracranial pressure , and a few other illnesses. In pediatric [11] and adult critical care [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] evidence-based practice has moved so far from ideal conditions for obtaining accurate respiratory-cycled dynamic index data that the information would have to yield otherwise unavailable, consistent, high-impact patient-centered outcome benefits to justify routine clinical use. "
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Management of pain, agitation, and delirium is a complex process requiring a multimodal approach to optimize patient outcomes. Dexmedetomidine is a centrally acting alpha-2 agonist with sedative and analgesic properties that has demonstrated efficacy in managing pain, agitation, and delirium in a variety of critically ill patient populations. Dexmedetomidine has demonstrated the ability to provide a mild to moderate level of sedation in diverse ICU populations compared to conventional sedative regimens. Recent literature has demonstrated improved outcomes with dexmedetomidine based vs. benzodiazepine based sedation therapy in select mechanically ventilated ICU patients. However, dexmedetomidine therapy has also been associated with adverse cardiovascular events including hypotension, bradycardia, and asystole. The clinical pharmacology, therapeutic efficacy, safety considerations, controversies, and future directions of dexmedetomidine therapy in the ICU setting will be discussed.
    Current pharmaceutical design 12/2012; 19(22). DOI:10.2174/1381612811319220009 · 3.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Achieving and maintaining an optimal level of comfort and safety in the ICU plays an integral part in caring for critically ill patients. In general, the choice of sedative agent used in ICU patients should be driven by the specific indications and goals of sedation for each patient and the clinical pharmacology of the sedative agent in a particular patient, including its onset and offset of effect and its side-effect profile. Utilizing standard rating scales and unit-based guidelines facilitates the proper use of sedation and analgesia. The triad of factors that lead to agitation include pain, delirium, and anxiety. These factors should be addressed in a stepwise manner and treatment should be focused to a specific indication. Use of sedative hypnotics should be limited to those patients requiring a deeper level of sedation to provide maximal comfort and safety for the patient, or in those in whom agitation is not controlled even after addressing the factors of the triad.
    International anesthesiology clinics 03/2013; 51(2):62-80. DOI:10.1097/AIA.0b013e31828d5b2b
Show more