Comparing two safety culture surveys: Safety Attitudes Questionnaire and Hospital Survey on Patient Safety
ABSTRACT To examine the reliability and predictive validity of two patient safety culture surveys-Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) and Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPS)-when administered to the same participants. Also to determine the ability to convert HSOPS scores to SAQ scores.
Employees working in intensive care units in 12 hospitals within a large hospital system in the southern United States were invited to anonymously complete both safety culture surveys electronically.
All safety culture dimensions from both surveys (with the exception of HSOPS's Staffing) had adequate levels of reliability. Three of HSOPS's outcomes-frequency of event reporting, overall perceptions of patient safety, and overall patient safety grade-were significantly correlated with SAQ and HSOPS dimensions of culture at the individual level, with correlations ranging from r=0.41 to 0.65 for the SAQ dimensions and from r=0.22 to 0.72 for the HSOPS dimensions. Neither the SAQ dimensions nor the HSOPS dimensions predicted the fourth HSOPS outcome-number of events reported within the last 12 months. Regression analyses indicated that HSOPS safety culture dimensions were the best predictors of frequency of event reporting and overall perceptions of patient safety while SAQ and HSOPS dimensions both predicted patient safety grade. Unit-level analyses were not conducted because indices did not indicate that aggregation was appropriate. Scores were converted between the surveys, although much variance remained unexplained.
Given that the SAQ and HSOPS had similar reliability and predictive validity, investigators and quality and safety leaders should consider survey length, content, sensitivity to change and the ability to benchmark when selecting a patient safety culture survey.
SourceAvailable from: Solvejg KristensenUgeskrift for laeger 09/2013;
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The importance of a safety culture to maximize safety is no longer questioned. However, achieving sustainable culture improvements are less evident. Evidence is growing for a multifaceted approach, where multiple safety interventions are combined. Lean management is such an integral approach to improve safety, quality and efficiency and therefore, could be expected to improve the safety culture. This paper presents the effects of lean management activities on the patient safety culture in a radiotherapy institute.European journal of oncology nursing: the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society 09/2014; 19(1). DOI:10.1016/j.ejon.2014.08.001 · 1.79 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: More and more health care organisations strive for a cost-effective, safe quality of care. Some studies have found simultaneous improved safety culture and reduction of patient harm following improvement activities like patient safety walk around, team training or multifaceted intervention programmes. There is a lack of evidence concerning the relationship between improved patient safety culture and reduction of patient harm in a Danish health-care setting. Currently a Danish validation of the Safety Attitude Questionnaire and an intervention study to improve patient safety culture is ongoing.Ugeskrift for laeger 08/2014; 176(32).