Efficacy of movement control exercises versus general exercises on recurrent sub-acute nonspecific low back pain in a sub-group of patients with movement control dysfunction. Protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (Impact Factor: 1.72). 04/2012; 13(1):55. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-55
Source: PubMed


Practice guidelines recommend various types of exercise for chronic back pain but there have been few head-to-head comparisons of these interventions. General exercise seems to be an effective option for management of chronic low back pain (LBP) but very little is known about the management of a sub-acute LBP within sub-groups. Recent research has developed clinical tests to identify a subgroup of patients with chronic non-specific LBP who have movement control dysfunction (MD).
We are conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the effects of general exercise and specific movement control exercise (SMCE) on disability and function in patients with MD within recurrent sub-acute LBP. The main outcome measure is the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire.
European clinical guideline for management of chronic LBP recommends that more research is required to develop tools to improve the classification and identification of specific clinical sub-groups of chronic LBP patients. Good quality RCTs are then needed to determine the effectiveness of specific interventions aimed at these specific target groups. This RCT aims to test the hypothesis whether patients within a sub-group of MD benefit more through a specific individually tailored movement control exercise program than through general exercises.

Download full-text


Available from: Hannu Luomajoki,
  • Source
    • "In the industrialized part of the world low back pain is extremely common. It is the single most common cause of disability at age above 45 years and second most common reason for primary care physician visit [4-6]. People throughout the world spend more than 100 billion US dollars/year for the treatment of low back pain [2]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cross sectional and observational. To evaluate the different aspects of lumbar disc degenerative disc disease and relate them with magnetic resonance image (MRI) findings and symptoms. Lumbar disc degenerative disease has now been proven as the most common cause of low back pain throughout the world. It may present as disc herniation, lumbar spinal stenosis, facet joint arthropathy or any combination. Presenting symptoms of lumbar disc degeneration are lower back pain and sciatica which may be aggravated by standing, walking, bending, straining and coughing. This study was conducted from January 2012 to June 2012. Study was conducted on the diagnosed patients of lumbar disc degeneration. Diagnostic criteria were based upon abnormal findings in MRI. Patients with prior back surgery, spine fractures, sacroiliac arthritis, metabolic bone disease, spinal infection, rheumatoid arthritis, active malignancy, and pregnancy were excluded. During the targeted months, 163 patients of lumbar disc degeneration with mean age of 43.92±11.76 years, came into Neurosurgery department. Disc degeneration was most commonly present at the level of L4/L5 105 (64.4%).Commonest types of disc degeneration were disc herniation 109 (66.9%) and lumbar spinal stenosis 37 (22.7%). Spondylolisthesis was commonly present at L5/S1 10 (6.1%) and associated mostly with lumbar spinal stenosis 7 (18.9%). Results reported the frequent occurrence of lumbar disc degenerative disease in advance age. Research efforts should endeavor to reduce risk factors and improve the quality of life.
    Asian spine journal 12/2013; 7(4):322-34. DOI:10.4184/asj.2013.7.4.322
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Schmerzen des untere Rückens sind meist unspezifisch, d. h. es gibt keinen spezifischen medizinischen Grund für die Schmerzen. Eine Subgruppierung unspezifischer Rückenschmerzen wurde deswegen als einer der wichtigsten Forschungsschwerpunkte genannt. Eine mögliche Subgruppe ist die Bewegungskontrolldysfunktion, bei der der Patient seine Bewegungen nicht bewusst kontrollieren kann. Eine Testbatterie wurde entwickelt und validiert, um diese Patientengruppe zu untersuchen und zu behandeln. Sie besteht aus 6 Bewegungstests und wurde als reliabel bewertet. Mit diesem Testverfahren können Personen mit Rückenschmerzen zuverlässig von gesunden Personen unterschieden werden. Ebenfalls untersucht wurde der Zusammenhang mit der Körperwahrnehmung. Dabei zeigte sich, dass Zweipunktdiskriminationsfähigkeit mit der verschlechterten Bewegungskontrolle des Rückens korreliert. Eine Fallserienstudie (n=38) ergab, dass diesen Patienten mit spezifischen Übungen gut geholfen werden kann. Da es in dieser Studie keine Kontrollgruppe gab, kann jedoch eine Kausalität nicht hergestellt werden.
    Manuelle Medizin 10/2012; 50(5):387-392. DOI:10.1007/s00337-012-0948-x
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Study Design. A 2(group) x 2(abdominal contraction) x 2(reach activity) crossover mixed design with repeated measures for contraction and activity examined the effects of a loaded (4.6kg) forward-reach activity and Abdominal-Drawing-In-Maneuver (ADIM) on Transverse Abdominis (TrA) contraction in subjects with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) history versus controls.Objectives. We measured TrA contraction during a loaded forward-reach activity while using the ADIM and examined if a NSLBP history affects TrA activity.Summary of Background Data. The ADIM supports trunk stability during function. Clinicians incorporate ADIM during patients' functional tasks. Pain-free individuals can sustain ADIM during function, such as forward-reach. However, this has not been tested in those with a NSLBP history.Methods. Eighteen normal and 18 NSLBP-history subjects participated. A blinded investigator recorded M-mode ultrasound imaging (MUSI) measurements of TrA thickness (mm) during 4 conditions: (1) Quiet standing without ADIM; (2) Quiet standing with ADIM; (3) Loaded forward-reach without ADIM; and (4) Loaded forward-reach with ADIM.Results. A mixed ANOVA demonstrated a significant main effect for group [F(1, 34) = 5.404, p = 0.026; Figure 2], where TrA thickness was greater for NSLBP history (7.41 + 2.34mm) versus controls (5.9 + 2.46mm). A significant main effect was observed for abdominal contraction [F (1, 34) = 49.57, p < 0.0001; Figure 3], where TrA thickness was greater during ADIM (7.47 + 2.7mm) versus without ADIM (5.84, 1.92m). A significant main effect was observed for forward-reach activity [F (1, 34) = 12.79, p = 0.001; Figure 4], where TrA thickness was greater during a loaded forward-reach (7.04+ 2.6mm) versus quiet standing (6.2 + 2.4mm). There were no significant interactions.Conclusions. Individuals can use a volitional preemptive ADIM for trunk protection during loaded forward-reach, potentially reducing injury risk. A NSLBP history increases TrA activation during ADIM, suggesting an enhanced protective role.
    Spine 01/2014; 2(39):E89–E96. DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000091 · 2.30 Impact Factor
Show more