Article

Soda consumption and the risk of stroke in men and women.

Wellness Institute of Cleveland Clinic, Lyndhurst, OH 44124, USA.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (Impact Factor: 6.5). 04/2012; 95(5):1190-9. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.111.030205
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Consumption of sugar-sweetened soda has been associated with an increased risk of cardiometabolic disease. The relation with cerebrovascular disease has not yet been closely examined.
Our objective was to examine patterns of soda consumption and substitution of alternative beverages for soda in relation to stroke risk.
The Nurses' Health Study, a prospective cohort study of 84,085 women followed for 28 y (1980-2008), and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study, a prospective cohort study of 43,371 men followed for 22 y (1986-2008), provided data on soda consumption and incident stroke.
We documented 1416 strokes in men during 841,770 person-years of follow-up and 2938 strokes in women during 2,188,230 person-years of follow-up. The pooled RR of total stroke for ≥ 1 serving of sugar-sweetened soda/d, compared with none, was 1.16 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.34). The pooled RR of total stroke for ≥ 1 serving of low-calorie soda/d, compared with none, was 1.16 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.28). Compared with 1 serving of sugar-sweetened soda/d, 1 serving of decaffeinated coffee/d was associated with a 10% (95% CI: 1%, 19%) lower risk of stroke and 1 serving of caffeinated coffee/d with a 9% (95% CI: 0%, 17%) lower risk. Similar estimated reductions in risk were seen for substitution of caffeinated or decaffeinated coffee for low-calorie soda.
Greater consumption of sugar-sweetened and low-calorie sodas was associated with a significantly higher risk of stroke. This risk may be reduced by substituting alternative beverages for soda.

1 Bookmark
 · 
104 Views
  • Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism 10/2013; · 8.90 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are a major source of empty calories and among the top sources of energy intake in the diets of U.S. adolescents and adults. While consumption of added sugars and SSBs may be decreasing, intakes remain high. Rather than solely focusing on specific foods/nutrients, dietary patterns are useful to evaluate overall diet quality and health outcomes for individuals and populations. SSBs are frequently included as part of a Western dietary pattern, which is related to obesity and poor health outcomes. Additionally, on their own, SSB consumption is associated with obesity, increased risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. This paper reviews the recent literature on dietary patterns and SSB consumption as well as SSBs and health. Reducing the intake of SSBs is a public health priority; new research shows promising results when changes are made in the food environment, including schools and workplaces.
    Current Nutrition Reports. 01/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To summarize the evidence with respect to sugar sweetened beverages (SSBs) consumption and risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and to recommend field standards for future analysis on this topic. Methods We searched for articles published up to February 2013 through PubMed, EMbase, and Cochrane Library Database and reviewed reference list of the retrieved articles. Prospective studies with reported relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of CHD for different categories of SSBs consumption were included. Random-effects models were used to evaluate the associations by comparing the highest and lowest categories of SSBs consumption in relation to risk of CHD. Results Four prospective studies with 7396 CHD cases among 173,753 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled RR (95% CI) for CHD in the highest category of SSBs consumption in comparison with the lowest category of SSBs was 1.17 (1.07–1.28). Stratified analyses indicated a significant association for men but not for women, with pooled RRs (95%CI) of 1.17 (1.05–1.29) and 1.19 (0.94–1.50), respectively. For studies carried out in America, the pooled RR for CHD was 1.18 (1.07–1.30). Additionally, a one-severing per day increase in SSBs consumption was associated with a 16% increased risk of CHD (RR: 1.16, 95%CI: 1.10–1.23). Conclusion Our meta-analysis of four studies suggests that consumption of SSBs may increase risk of CHD, especially among men and American populations. However, this finding was based on limited studies; further studies are warranted to critically evaluate the relationship.
    Atherosclerosis 01/2014; 234(1):11–16. · 3.71 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
38 Downloads
Available from
May 22, 2014