Article

Use of pooled samples from the national health and nutrition examination survey

Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. .
Statistics in Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.04). 11/2012; 31(27). DOI: 10.1002/sim.5341
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provides an ongoing assessment of the US population's exposure to environmental chemicals by using biomonitoring in conjunction with CDC's National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Characterizing the distributions of concentrations of environmental compounds or their metabolites in the US population is a primary objective of CDC's biomonitoring program. Historically, this characterization has been based on individual measurements of these compounds in body fluid or tissue from representative samples of the population. Pooling samples before making analytical measurements can reduce the costs of biomonitoring by reducing the number of analyses. For the first time in NHANES 2005-2006, a weighted pooled-sample design was implemented to facilitate pooling samples before making analytical measurements. This paper describes this design and the estimation method being developed in the National Center for Environmental Health, Division of Laboratory Sciences (NCEH/DLS) to characterize concentrations of polychlorinated and polybrominated compounds. We present percentile estimates for 2,2 ( ' ) ,4,4 ( ' ) ,5,5 ( ' ) -hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB153) in specific subpopulations of the US based on the NHANES 2005-2006 pooled-sample design. We also compare estimates based on individual samples from NHANES 2003-2004 with estimates based on artificially created pools from NHANES 2003-2004 using a pooled-sample design similar to the one used for NHANES 2005-2006. For NHANES 2005-2006 the number of analyses required to characterize the levels of 61 polychlorinated and 13 polybrominated compounds in the US population was reduced from 2201 to 228. At a cost of $1400 per analytical measurement, this represents a savings of approximately $2.78 million. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Samuel P Caudill, Aug 08, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
225 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Based on existing data and previous work, a series of studies is proposed as a basis towards a pragmatic early step in transforming toxicity testing. These studies were assembled into a data-driven framework that invokes successive tiers of testing with margin-of-exposure (MOE) as the primary metric. The first tier of the framework integrates data from high-throughput in vitro assays, in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) pharmacokinetic modeling, and exposure modeling. The in vitro assays are used to separate chemicals based on their relative selectivity in interacting with biological targets and identify the concentration at which these interactions occur. The IVIVE modeling converts in vitro concentrations into external dose for calculation of the point-of-departure (POD) and comparisons to human exposure estimates to yield a MOE. The second tier involves short-term in vivo studies, expanded pharmacokinetic evaluations, and refined human exposure estimates. The results from the second tier studies provide more accurate estimates of the POD and the MOE. The third tier contains the traditional animal studies currently used to assess chemical safety. In each tier, the POD for selective chemicals is based primarily on endpoints associated with a proposed mode of action while the POD for nonselective chemicals is based on potential biological perturbation. Based on the MOE, a significant percentage of chemicals evaluated in the first two tiers could be eliminated from further testing. The framework provides a risk-based and animal-sparing approach to evaluate chemical safety, drawing broadly from previous experience but incorporating technological advances to increase efficiency.
    Toxicological Sciences 08/2013; 136(1). DOI:10.1093/toxsci/kft178 · 4.48 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Choosing an appropriate sampling strategy for chemical analysis within environmental monitoring includes the important decision of whether to sample and store individual or pooled samples. This choice impacts on future analyses from Environmental Specimen Bank samples. A number of advantages exist to support using either individual or pooled samples for temporal trend studies. However, it is important to know the total and analytical variance to be able to design the best sampling strategy. Statistical power in temporal or spatial studies is determined by the random/unexplained sample variation. The relationship between chemical analytical error and other sources of variation, as well as the cost for collection, preparation of samples and chemical analysis, will determine the number of individuals in each pool, and the number of pools that should be analysed to achieve high cost efficiency and good statistical power. Various scenarios of different numbers of individual samples, different numbers of pooled samples containing various numbers of individual specimens, the relationships between chemical analytical error and other sources of sample variance, have been compared by simulating random sampling from computer generated populations using realistic measures of variation from ongoing monitoring activities. These results offer guidance in the design of a cost-efficient, statistically sound sampling strategy.
    Chemosphere 10/2013; 94. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.09.096 · 3.50 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Biomonitoring has become the "gold standard" in assessing chemical exposures, and has an important role in risk assessment. The pooling of biological specimens-combining multiple individual specimens into a single sample-can be used in biomonitoring studies to monitor levels of exposure and identify exposure trends or to identify susceptible populations in a cost-effective manner. Pooled samples provide an estimate of central tendency and may also reveal information about variation within the population. The development of a pooling strategy requires careful consideration of the type and number of samples collected, the number of pools required and the number of specimens to combine per pool in order to maximise the type and robustness of the data. Creative pooling strategies can be used to explore exposure-outcome associations, and extrapolation from other larger studies can be useful in identifying elevated exposures in specific individuals. The use of pooled specimens is advantageous as it saves significantly on analytical costs, may reduce the time and resources required for recruitment and, in certain circumstances, allows quantification of samples approaching the limit of detection. In addition, the use of pooled samples can provide population estimates while avoiding ethical difficulties that may be associated with reporting individual results.Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology advance online publication, 6 November 2013; doi:10.1038/jes.2013.76.
    Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology 11/2013; DOI:10.1038/jes.2013.76 · 3.05 Impact Factor
Show more