Article

Knee separation distance and lower extremity kinematics during a drop land: implications for clinical screening.

Jacquelin Perry Musculoskeletal Biomechanics Research Laboratory, Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, CHP-155, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Journal of athletic training (impact factor: 1.8). 01/2011; 46(5):471-5. pp.471-5
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Excessive knee valgus during dynamic tasks is thought to contribute to lower extremity overuse and traumatic injuries. Clinically, assessments of frontal-plane knee motion typically include measures of the distance between the knees during landing. However, it is not clear how this clinical assessment relates to knee-abduction angle or how it is influenced by the position of the lower extremities in the transverse and frontal planes.
To determine whether normalized knee separation distance (NKSD) is a predictor of knee-abduction angles and to assess the influence of lower extremity transverse-plane and frontal-plane angles on NKSD during a drop land.
Cross-sectional study.
Motion analysis laboratory.
Twenty-five healthy female athletes.
The frontal-plane distance between the 2-dimensional coordinates of markers over the greater trochanters (intertrochanteric distance), lateral femoral epicondyles (knee separation distance), and lateral malleoli (stance width) bilaterally was calculated during a drop land. The knee separation distance was normalized by intertrochanteric distance (NKSD). Concurrently, 3-dimensional lower extremity transverse-plane and frontal-plane kinematics were obtained.
We assessed NKSD, stance width, and bilateral average knee and hip transverse plane and frontal-plane angles and ankle frontal-plane angles. Linear regression was used to determine the association between NKSD and bilateral average knee frontal-plane angles. Stepwise multiple regression was used to identify the best predictors of NKSD during the drop land.
After we controlled for stance width, NKSD explained 52% of the variance in the knee frontal-plane angle. When we took lower extremity kinematics into account, after controlling for stance width, the average hip frontal-plane angle was the best predictor of NKSD, explaining 97% of the variance.
Although NKSD is a predictor of knee-abduction angle, frontal-plane hip angle and stance width are strongly related to NKSD. Caution must be taken when interpreting NKSD as knee abduction.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
44 Views

Keywords

3-dimensional lower extremity transverse-plane
 
ankle frontal-plane angles
 
average hip frontal-plane angle
 
drop land
 
frontal-plane angles
 
frontal-plane distance
 
frontal-plane hip angle
 
frontal-plane kinematics
 
frontal-plane knee motion
 
intertrochanteric distance
 
knee frontal-plane angle
 
knee separation distance
 
knee-abduction angle
 
knee-abduction angles
 
lower extremities
 
lower extremity kinematics
 
lower extremity overuse
 
lower extremity transverse-plane
 
Motion analysis laboratory
 
normalized knee separation distance
 

Susan M Sigward