Article

The Impact of Tax Policies on Living Organ Donations in the United States

Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
American Journal of Transplantation (Impact Factor: 6.19). 04/2012; 12(8):2133-40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04044.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In an effort to increase living organ donation, fifteen states passed tax deductions and one a tax credit to help defray potential medical, lodging and wage loss costs between 2004 and 2008. To assess the impact of these policies on living donation rates, we used a differences-in-differences strategy that compares the pre- and postlegislation change in living donations in states that passed legislation against the same change in those states that did not. We found no statistically significant effect of these tax policies on donation rates. Furthermore, we found no evidence of any lagged effects, differential impacts by gender, race or donor relationship, or impacts on deceased donation. Possible hypotheses to explain our findings are: the cash value of the tax deduction may be too low to defray costs faced by donors, lack of public awareness about the existence of these policies, and that states that were proactive enough to pass tax policy laws may have already depleted donor pools with previous interventions.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
125 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many U.S. states passed legislation providing leave to organ and bone marrow donors and/or tax benefits for live and deceased organ and bone marrow donations and to employers of donors. We exploit cross-state variation in the timing of such legislation to analyze its impact on organ donations by living and deceased persons, on measures of the quality of the transplants, and on the number of bone marrow donations. We find that these provisions do not have a significant impact on the quantity of organs donated. The leave laws, however, do have a positive impact on bone marrow donations, and the effect increases with the size of the population of beneficiaries and with the generosity of the legislative provisions. Our results suggest that this legislation works for moderately invasive procedures such as bone marrow donation, but these incentives may be too low for organ donation, which is riskier and more burdensome.
    Journal of Health Economics 10/2013; 33C:43-56. DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.10.006 · 2.25 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To date, there has been little analysis of the degree to which emerging incentive initiatives are permissible under Canadian law. The purpose of this review is to examine the relevant law - including legislation and case law - in order to clarify the legality of existing proposed incentive schemes. Legislation and case law. Organ donation is governed by provincial legislation that, in general, bans the exchange of any "benefit" or any form of "valuable consideration" in return for an organ. As such, these laws are tremendously restrictive and could have significant implications for emerging and proposed procurement policy. Given the need for innovative, ethically appropriate policies to increase donation rates, we suggest that the time is right to rethink the potentially restrictive nature of Canada's organ donation laws.
    01/2014; 1(1):7. DOI:10.1186/2054-3581-1-7
  • Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 10/2013; 8(12). DOI:10.2215/CJN.09820913 · 5.07 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
12 Downloads
Available from
Sep 18, 2014