Article

Occupational food-related hand dermatoses seen over a 10-year period

Department of Dermato-Allergology, National Allergy Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.
Contact Dermatitis (Impact Factor: 3.62). 05/2012; 66(5):264-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.02048.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND. Protein contact dermatitis was originally defined in 1976 by Hjorth and Roed-Petersen as a distinct kind of dermatitis seen in patients with occupational food contact. Even though occupational skin diseases are frequent in Denmark, little attention has been paid to protein contact dermatitis, and the frequency is unknown.
To evaluate the frequency of occupational food-related hand dermatoses and test results in patients occupationally exposed to foods.
This was a retrospective study based on examinations, including skin prick testing and patch testing, performed at the Department of Dermato-Allergology, Gentofte University Hospital, Denmark between 2001 and 2010.
Of all patients (n = 372), 57.0% had irritant contact dermatitis, 22.0% had protein contact dermatitis, 2.4% had contact urticaria, and 1.8% had allergic contact dermatitis. A suggestion for diagnostic criteria is presented. Frequent risk occupations were cooking in restaurants, baking, and kitchen work. Substantially more patients reacted in skin prick testing with fresh foods than with food extracts. Conclusion. Protein contact dermatitis is a frequent disorder among patients who professionally handle foods, and should be considered to be a distinct clinical entity. When diagnosing protein contact dermatitis and in other food-related skin prick testing procedures, it is important to include fresh foods.

0 Followers
 · 
179 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is a common diagnosis in patients with occupational contact dermatitis (OCD). Studies are lacking on the usefulness of material safety data sheets (MSDSs) in making the diagnosis of ICD.Objective To characterize irritant exposures leading to the diagnosis of occupational ICD (OICD), and to evaluate the occurrence of concomitant exposures to contact allergens.Methods We included 316 patients with suspected occupational hand dermatitis, referred to the Department of Dermato-Allergology, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Denmark during January 2010–August 2011, in a programme consisting of a clinical examination, exposure assessment, and extensive patch/prick testing.ResultsOCD was diagnosed in 228 patients. Of these patients, 118 were diagnosed with OICD. The main irritant exposures identified were wet work (n = 64), gloves (n = 45), mechanical traumas (n = 19), and oils (n = 15). Exposure to specific irritant chemicals was found in 9 patients, and was identified from MSDSs/ingredients labelling in 8 of these patients. Review of MSDSs and ingredients labelling showed that 41 patients were exposed to 41 moderate to potent contact allergens, and 18 patients were exposed to 25 weak workplace contact allergens.Conclusion In the present study, the systematic exposure assessment did not reveal any new irritants. MSDSs have a limited role in the investigation of ICD.
    Contact Dermatitis 10/2014; 71(6). DOI:10.1111/cod.12290 · 3.62 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Seafood is a very potent allergen. Epidemiological studies of seafood allergy in the highly exposed cooking profession are lacking. The objective of this first case series was to demonstrate the high relevance and consequences of seafood allergy in cooks.Patients und Methods Retrospective analysis of all the case files sent in which the presence of an occupational disease according to no. 5101 of the appendix of the German ordinance on industrial disease was to be clarified.ResultsThirty cooks (men 70 %) with an occupational seafood allergy were assessed between January 2008 and April 2014. Seafood allergy was observed in young workers (median age 24.7 yrs.) with an early manifestation of the disease (after median employment time of 1.7 years). In all except one (96.7 %) onset was localized on the hands. Most commonly documented were immediate sensitizations to cod, salmon, trout, and herring. Emergency treatment due to an anaphylactic shock at the workplace became necessary in 5 cases (16.7 %). In 27 cases (90 %) discontinuation of occupation was needed and occurred after a median job period of 6.3 years.Conclusions Seafood allergy in cooks is mostly characterized by a quick progressive course of disease, generally at the start of the cooking career. The prognosis for continuance in occupation is poor and an occupational disease must be considered at an early stage. An emergency kit with an epinephrine auto-injector should be provided for life by the responsible accident insurer.
    Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft 10/2014; 12(10). DOI:10.1111/ddg.12456 · 1.40 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ZusammenfassungHintergrundMeeresfrüchte sind sehr potente Allergene. Epidemiologische Studien über Meeresfruchtallergien bei Köchen, der herausragend exponierten Berufsgruppe, existieren bislang nicht. Ziel der Arbeit war es anhand einer ersten größeren Fallserie die hohe Relevanz und Konsequenzen einer Meeresfrüchteallergie bei Köchen aufzuzeigen.Patienten und MethodikRetrospektive Auswertung aller zugesandten Feststellungsverfahrensakten zur Frage des Vorliegens einer Berufskrankheit nach Nr. 5101 der Anlage zur Berufskrankheitenverordnung.ErgebnisseZwischen Januar 2008 und April 2014 wurden 30 Köche (Mnneranteil 70 %) mit einer berufsbedingten Meeresfrüchteallergie begutachtet. Es handelte sich mehrheitlich um recht junge Versicherte (Altersmedian 24,7 J.) mit einer frühen Manifestation der Meeresfrüchteallergie (im Median nach 1,7 Berufsjahren), fast ausnahmslos beginnend an den Hnden (96,7 %). Am hufigsten waren Soforttypsensibilisierungen gegenüber Kabeljau, Lachs, Forelle und Hering aktendokumentiert. In fünf Fllen (16,7 %) war eine notrztliche Therapie aufgrund eines anaphylaktischen Schocks am Arbeitsplatz notwendig geworden. Die Berufsaufgabe war in 27 Fllen (90 %) geboten und erfolgte im Median nach 6,3 Berufsjahren.SchlussfolgerungenMeeresfruchtallergien bei Köchen zeichnen sich durch einen rasch progredienten Verlauf bereits nach wenigen Berufsjahren aus. Die Hinlnglichkeit von Arbeits-, Hautschutz- und Therapiemaßnahmen bleibt stets kritisch zu hinterfragen. Rechtzeitig ist daher der Aufgabezwang der gefhrdenden Kochttigkeit zu prüfen. Die Versorgung mit einem einen Epinephrin-Autoinjektor beinhaltenden Notfallset zu Lasten des Unfallversicherungstrgers ist unabdingbar.
    Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft 10/2014; 12(10). DOI:10.1111/ddg.12456_suppl · 1.40 Impact Factor