Article

Community-Based Programs for Children and Youth: Our Experiences in Design, Implementation, and Evaluation

Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA.
Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics (Impact Factor: 1.42). 05/2012; 32(2):111-9. DOI: 10.3109/01942638.2012.668089
Source: PubMed
7 Followers
 · 
183 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The high prevalence of childhood obesity continues to persist, especially in children and youth with special healthcare needs (CYSHCN). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health model and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations are appropriate frameworks related to increasing physical activity and healthy eating habits among CYSHCN. This review aims to provide pediatric providers with recommendations in the assessment, treatment, and management of obesity in CYSHCN.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: This case report describes the effects of a 6-week progressive tap dance program on static and dynamic balance for a child with type 1 congenital myotonic muscular dystrophy (congenital MMD1). Summary of Key Points: A 6-year-old girl with congenital MMD1 participated in a 1-hour progressive tap dance program. Classes were held once a week for 6 consecutive weeks and included 3 children with adaptive needs and 1 peer with typical development. The Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, second edition (BOT-2) balance subsection and the Pediatric Balance Scale were completed at the beginning of the first class and the sixth class. The participant's BOT-2 score improved from 3 to 14. Her Pediatric Balance Scale score did not change. Conclusion: Participation in a progressive tap dance class by a child with congenital MMD1 may facilitate improvements in static and dynamic balance.
    Pediatric Physical Therapy 09/2014; 26(3):360-365. DOI:10.1097/PEP.0000000000000064 · 1.29 Impact Factor