Article

δ-Aminolevulinate dehydratase activity and oxidative stress during melphalan and cyclophosphamide–BCNU–etoposide (CBV) conditioning regimens in autologous bone marrow transplantation patients

Departamento de Química, CCNE, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 97105-900 Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; Departamento de Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas, CCS, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 97105-900 Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
Pharmacological Research (Impact Factor: 4.35). 01/2009; DOI:10.1016/j.phrs.2008.12.005

ABSTRACT Severe toxicity is associated with cytotoxic drugs used during the conditioning regimen (CR) preceding bone marrow transplantation (BMT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the involvement of oxidative stress and possible use of δ-aminolevulinate dehydratase (δ-ALA-D) activity as a marker of oxidative stress in autologous BMT patients. We have also compared common drugs that are used during CR, namely, melphalan (M-200) and cyclophosphamide–BCNU–etoposide (CBV), in order to determine whether either of them could be less toxic to patients in terms of oxidative stress. The sample consisted of 10 patients admitted for autologous BMT, 5 with M-200 CR and 5 with CBV CR and 10 healthy controls. Lipid peroxidation (estimated as thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances, TBARS), vitamin C, thiol levels, catalase, superoxide dismutase and δ-ALA-D activity were determined before CR, during CR and on days 10 and 20 after BMT. Signs of exacerbated oxidative stress were minimal before CR, except for the CVB group (patients with lymphoma) where an increase in TBARS and a decrease in P-SH were detected. Indices of oxidative stress changed in both groups (CBV and M-200) during CR and up to 20 days after BMT. There was a decrease in enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defenses and in δ-ALA-D activity and an increase in lipoperoxidation in the blood of both patient groups. In conclusion, CBV and, principally, M-200 caused oxidative stress in patients undergoing autologous BMT and blood δ-ALA-D activity seems to be an additional biomarker of oxidative stress in BMT patients.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
70 Views
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Adriamycin is a potent antitumor drug that causes severe cardiotoxicity. However, the toxic mechanisms are not clear. We used a proteomics approach to analyze changes in protein profiles after adriamycin-induced changes in hemodynamic factors. Although adriamycin itself did not affect left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) or left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP), the drug did enhance susceptibility to ischemia-reperfusion-induced changes in LVDP, LVEDP and heart rate. Adriamycin altered the expression of 52 proteins, primarily energy metabolism and cytoskeleton proteins. Adriamycin decreased the expression of the metabolism-related proteins, ATP synthase, Sdha protein, Triose phosphate isomerase 1 (TPI-1), pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 alpha1, 6-phosphofructokinase, and fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase, as did cytoskeletal proteins, such as actin. Alterations in energy metabolism and subsequent free radical production may affect cytoskeletal protein expression, producing adriamycin-induced changes in cardiac hemodynamics.
    Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology 09/2010; 32(3):376-86. · 1.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Alterations in checkpoint and DNA repair pathways may provide adaptive mechanisms contributing to acquired drug resistance. Here, we investigated the levels of proteins mediating DNA damage signaling and -repair in RPMI8226 multiple myeloma cells and its Melphalan-resistant derivative 8226-LR5. We observed markedly reduced steady-state levels of DNA glycosylases UNG2, NEIL1 and MPG in the resistant cells and cross-resistance to agents inducing their respective DNA base lesions. Conversely, repair of alkali-labile sites was apparently enhanced in the resistant cells, as substantiated by alkaline comet assay, autoribosylation of PARP-1, and increased sensitivity to PARP-1 inhibition by 4-AN or KU58684. Reduced base-excision and enhanced single-strand break repair would both contribute to the observed reduction in genomic alkali-labile sites, which could jeopardize productive processing of the more cytotoxic Melphalan-induced interstrand DNA crosslinks (ICLs). Furthermore, we found a marked upregulation of proteins in the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway of double-strand break (DSB) repair, likely contributing to the observed increase in DSB repair kinetics in the resistant cells. Finally, we observed apparent upregulation of ATR-signaling and downregulation of ATM-signaling in the resistant cells. This was accompanied by markedly increased sensitivity towards Melphalan in the presence of ATR-, DNA-PK, or CHK1/2 inhibitors whereas no sensitizing effect was observed subsequent to ATM inhibition, suggesting that replication blocking lesions are primary triggers of the DNA damage response in the Melphalan resistant cells. In conclusion, Melphalan resistance is apparently contributed by modulation of the DNA damage response at multiple levels, including downregulation of specific repair pathways to avoid repair intermediates that could impair efficient processing of cytotoxic ICLs and ICL-induced DSBs. This study has revealed several novel candidate biomarkers for Melphalan sensitivity that will be included in targeted quantitation studies in larger patient cohorts to validate their value in prognosis as well as targets for replacement- or adjuvant therapies.
    PLoS ONE 01/2013; 8(2):e55493. · 3.73 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
25 Downloads
Available from
Feb 26, 2013