Automatic quantification of left ventricular ejection fraction from gated blood pool SPECT

Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los √Āngeles, California, United States
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology (Impact Factor: 2.65). 09/1999; 6(5):498-506. DOI: 10.1016/S1071-3581(99)90022-3

ABSTRACT Background. Cardiac gated blood pool single photon emission computed tomography (GBPS) better separates cardiac chambers compared with planar radionuclide ventriculography (PRNV). We have developed a completely automatic algorithm to measure quantitatively the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from gated technetium 99m-red blood cells (RBC) GBPS short-axis 3-dimensional image volumes.Methods and Results. The algorithm determines an ellipsoidal coordinate system for the left ventricle and then computes a static estimate of the endocardial surface by use of counts and count gradients. A dynamic surface representing the endocardium is computed for each interval of the cardiac cycle by use of additional information from the temporal Fourier transform of the image data sets. The algorithm then calculates the left ventricular volume for each interval and computes LVEF from the end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes. The algorithm was developed in a pilot group (N = 45) and validated in a second group (N = 89) of patients who underwent PRNV and 8-interval GBPS. Technically inadequate studies (N = 38) were rejected before grouping and processing. Automatic identification and contouring of the left ventricle was successful in patients (70%) globally and in patients (85%) in the validation group. Correlation between LVEFs measured from GBPS and PRNV was high (y = 2.00 + 1.01x, r = 0.89), with GBPS LVEF significantly higher than PRNV LVEF (average difference = 2.8%, P < .004).Conclusions. Our automatic algorithm agrees with conventional radionuclide measurements of LVEF and provides the basis for 3-dimensional analysis of wall motion.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: IntroductionLeft ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the single most important predictor of prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography (ERNV) is considered the most reliable technique for assessing LVEF. Most of these patients undergo two dimensional (2D) echocardiography and myocardial viability study using gated myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) or gated F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) PET. However, the accuracy of LVEF assessed by these methods is not clear. This study has been designed to assess the correlation and agreement between the LVEF measured by 2D echocardiography, gated blood pool single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), Tc-99m tetrofosmin gated SPECT, and F-18-FDG gated PET with ERNV in CAD patients with severe LV dysfunction.Patients and methodsPatients with CAD and severe LV dysfunction [ejection fraction (EF) <35 assessed by 2D echocardiography] were prospectively included in the study. These patients underwent ERNV along with gated blood pool SPECT, Tc-99m tetrofosmin gated SPECT, and F-18-FDG gated PET as per the standard protocol for myocardial viability assessment and LVEF calculation. Spearman's coefficient of correlation (r) was calculated for the different sets of values with significance level kept at a P-value less than 0.05. Bland-Altman plots were inspected to visually assess the between-agreement measurements from different methods.ResultsForty-one patients were prospectively included. LVEF calculated by various radionuclide methods showed good correlation with ERNV as follows: gated blood pool SPECT, r=0.92; MPI gated SPECT, r=0.85; and F-18-FDG gated PET, r=0.76. However, the correlation between 2D echocardiography and ERNV was poor (r=0.520). The Bland-Altman plot for LVEF measured by all radionuclide methods showed good agreement with ERNV. However, agreement between 2D echocardiography and ERNV is poor, as most of the values in this plot gave a negative difference for low EF and a positive difference for high EF. The mean difference between various techniques [2D echocardiography (a), gated blood pool SPECT (b), MPI gated SPECT (c), F-18-FDG gated PET (d)] and ERNV (e) was as follows: (a)-(e), 3.3; (b)-(e), 5; (c)-(e), 1.1; and (d)-(e), 2.9. The best possible correlation and agreement was found between MPI gated SPECT and ERNV.Conclusion This study showed good correlation and agreement between MPI gated SPECT and F-18-FDG gated PET with ERNV for LVEF calculation in CAD patients with severe LV dysfunction. Thus, subjecting patients who undergo viability assessment by MPI gated SPECT or F-18-FDG gated PET to a separate procedure like ERNV for LVEF assessment may not be warranted. As the gated blood pool SPECT also showed good correlation and agreement with ERNV for LVEF assessment in CAD patients with severe LV dysfunction, with better characteristics than ERNV, it can be routinely used whenever accurate LVEF assessment is needed. (C) 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
    Nuclear Medicine Communications 08/2014; 35(11). DOI:10.1097/MNM.0000000000000182 · 1.37 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The technique of SPECT-RNV (radionuclide ventriculography) offers a greater amount of clinically usable data than its planar counterpart (P-RNV). In transitioning from planar to SPECT-only acquisition methodologies, reprojection of the SPECT data can provide a planar dataset which can be used as an interim technique. The aim of this study was to test if reprojected planar images could be used as a surrogate for true planar images in SPECT-only setting. We performed SPECT-RNV and P-RNV on 47 patients on traditional sodium iodide (NaI) cameras, determining left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) for planar (EFP) and SPECT (EFS) techniques. We reprojected the SPECT-RNV data along the best septal separation angle determined from planar scanning. This creates a further planar dataset denoted 'reprojected P-RNV' (rP-RNV) giving a reprojected ejection fraction (EFR) which can be used as a validation variable in transitioning to SPECT-only acquisition. Performing t tests showed no statistical difference between EFP and EFR (P > .017) but bias was observed in EFS results compared to EFP and EFS compared to EFR results. An unblinded, comparison of parametric data between the three datasets for a subset of ten patients showed good clinical concordance. False negative and false positive rates were low for rP-RNV compared to P-RNV. The reprojected planar LVEF correlates well to P-RNV EF values. The rP-RNV dataset can aid clinicians in transitioning from planar RNV to SPECT-only acquisition.
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 08/2014; 21(5). DOI:10.1007/s12350-014-9945-x · 2.65 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gated blood po ol single photon emission computed tomography (GBPS) offers the possibility of obtaining additional functional information from blood pool studies, including evaluation of left and right ventricular function simultaneously. The calculation of ventricular volumes based on the identification of the endocardial surface would be influenced by the spatial resolution in the reconstructed images. This study was performed to evaluate the effect of different filters on the right ventricular function. The normal four-dimensional (4-D) NURBS-based cardiac-torso (NCAT) phantom with known right ventricular volume and ejection fraction was generated. The SIMIND Monte Carlo program was used to create projections. The studies were reconstructed by FBP and post-processing filtration such as Butterworth, Hanning, Shepp-Logan, Metz and Wiener in different statuses (cutoff and order). Using the Cedars-Sinai QBS (quantitative blood pool SPECT) package, the ventricular functional parameters were computed. The calculated values were analyzed and compared with the normal NCAT results. The results implied that the calculated right ventricular end diastolic volume (RVEDV) by Butterworth filtration (cutoff frequency = 0.3) agreed more with the NCAT Phantom characteristics [relative difference percentage (RDP) = 1.2 %], while the maximum accordance in the calculation of the RV ejection fraction (EF) (RDP = 3 %) was observed by Metz filter (FWHM 20 pixel). Also, the results of this study demonstrate that the Butterworth filter provided the most stable values (cutoff frequency = 0.4-0.5) in the estimation of RVEDV (RDP = 7.5 %). The Hanning and Shepp-Logan filters produced a much larger RDP, particularly in low frequency (41.1 and 21.5 %, respectively) compared to other filters. This study demonstrated that the operation of different filters has a severe effect in computing right ventricular volume. The resolution recovery and Butterworth filters tend to give more comparable ventricular volumes with the actual normal NCAT value. Further evaluation using a large clinical database is underway to evaluate the optimum protocol in a clinical setting.
    Annals of Nuclear Medicine 01/2015; DOI:10.1007/s12149-015-0949-7 · 1.51 Impact Factor