Article

Predicting the toxic potential of drugs and chemicals in silico: A model for the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPAR γ)

Biographics Laboratory 3R, Friedensgasse 35, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Molecular Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
Toxicology Letters DOI:10.1016/j.toxlet.2007.06.011 pp.17-23

ABSTRACT Poor pharmacokinetics, side effects and compound toxicity are frequent causes of late-stage failures in drug development. A safe in silico identification of adverse effects triggered by drugs and chemicals would therefore be highly desirable as it not only bears economical potential but also spawns a variety of ecological benefits: sustainable resource management, reduction of animal models and possibly less risky clinical trials as in silico studies are typically based on human proteins. In the recent past, our laboratory has developed a 6D-QSAR concept and validated a series of “virtual test kits” based on the aryl hydrocarbon, estrogen, androgen, thyroid, and glucocorticoid receptor as well as on the enzyme cytochrome P450 3A4. The test kits were trained using a representative selection of 610 substances and validated with 188 compounds different therefrom. These models were subsequently compiled into a database for the virtual screening of drugs and environmental chemicals. In this account, we report the validation of a model for the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPAR γ). Its receptor surrogate is based on the experimental structure of the protein and 95 tyrosine-based compounds. The simulation reached a cross-validated r2 = 0.832 (75 training ligands) and yielded a predictive r2 = 0.723 (20 test compounds). The model was challenged by a series of scramble tests as well as with the prediction of a few structurally different compounds.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
12 Views

Keywords

188 compounds different therefrom
 
20 test compounds
 
610 substances
 
6D-QSAR concept
 
75 training ligands
 
95 tyrosine-based compounds
 
drug development
 
economical potential
 
enzyme cytochrome P450 3A4
 
human proteins
 
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ
 
Poor pharmacokinetics
 
risky clinical trials
 
scramble tests
 
silico identification
 
silico studies
 
structurally different compounds
 
sustainable resource management
 
virtual screening
 
“virtual test kits”
 

Angelo Vedani