Exergy analysis of solid-oxide fuel-cell (SOFC) systems

Department of Applied Mechanics, Thermodynamics and Fluid Dynamics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
Energy (Impact Factor: 4.16). 01/1997; DOI: 10.1016/S0360-5442(96)00119-3

ABSTRACT The exergy concept has been used to analyze two methane-fueled SOFC systems. The systems include preheating of fuel and air, reforming of methane to hydrogen, and combustion of the remaining fuel in an afterburner. An iterative computer program using a sequential-modular approach was developed and used for the analyses. Simulation of an SOFC system with external reforming yielded first-law and second-law efficiencies of 58 and 56%, respectively, with 600% theoretical air. Heat released from the afterburner was used to reform methane, vaporize water, and preheat air and fuel. When these heat requirements were satisfied, the exhaust-gas temperature was so low that it could only be used for heating rooms or water. Because of heat requirements in the system, fuel utilization (FU) in the FC was limited to 75%. The remaining fuel was used for preheating and reforming. Reduced excess air led to reduced heat requirements and the possibility of a higher FU in the FC. Irreversibilities were also reduced and efficiencies increased. Recycling fuel and water vapor from the FC resulted in first-law and second-law efficiencies of 75.5 and 73%, respectively, with 600% theoretical air, vaporization of water was avoided and the FU was greater.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this review paper, a comprehensive literature survey on macro-level modeling of solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) is presented. First, the current status of the SOFC modeling is assessed. Second, modeling techniques are discussed in detail. These include the thermodynamics, electrochemistry and heat transfer aspects of the modeling. Thermodynamic relations for pure hydrogen as the fuel and then gas mixture as the fuel are given. Additionally, exergy destructed due to polarizations is shown. Then, modeling equations for ohmic, activation, and concentration polarizations are given. Handling the carbon deposition problem in the modeling is discussed. The inclusion of the convection and radiation heat transfer processes to the modeling is explained. Finally, the models in literature are compared in terms of the methodology used and suggestions for increasing the accuracy of the future models are given. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    International Journal of Energy Research 03/2008; 32(4):336 - 355. · 2.74 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper presents a full and partial load exergy analysis of a hybrid SOFC–GT power plant. The plant basically consists of: an air compressor, a fuel compressor, several heat exchangers, a radial gas turbine, mixers, a catalytic burner, an internal reforming tubular solid oxide fuel cell stack, bypass valves, an electrical generator and an inverter. The model is accurately described. Special attention is paid at the calculation of SOFC overpotentials. Maps are introduced, and properly scaled, in order to evaluate the partial load performance of turbomachineries. The plant is simulated at full-load and part-load operation, showing energy and exergy flows trough all its components and thermodynamic properties at each key-point. At full-load operation a maximum value of 65.4% of electrical efficiency is achieved. Three different part-load strategies are introduced. The off-design operation is achieved handling the following parameters: air mass flow rate, fuel mass flow rate, combustor bypass, gas turbine bypass, avoiding the use of a variable speed control system. Results showed that the most efficient part-load strategy corresponded to a constant value of the fuel to air ratio. On the other hand, a lower value of net electrical power (34% of nominal load) could be achieved reducing fuel flow rate, at constant air flow rate. This strategy produces an electrical efficiency drop that becomes 45%.
    Journal of Power Sources 01/2006; 158(1):225-244. · 5.26 Impact Factor
  • Journal of Energy Resources Technology-transactions of The Asme - J ENERG RESOUR TECHNOL. 01/2009; 131(3).