Article

Liquidity supply in electronic markets

University of New South Wales, Australia; Deutsche Bank AG, Australia; Babcock Graduate School of Management, Wake Forest University, USA; University of Memphis, USA
Journal of Financial Markets (Impact Factor: 1.12). 02/2007; DOI: 10.1016/j.finmar.2006.12.001

ABSTRACT We examine the supply of liquidity by proprietary trading desks and hedge funds (PTDH) versus mutual funds, index funds, and insurance companies (MII) across ten bid (ask) steps of the limit order book. We document that institutional investors simultaneously supply liquidity at multiple prices in the limit order book. We also find that PTDHs are more price aggressive liquidity suppliers than MIIs, consistent with hypothesized responses to observed changes in the cost and risk of non-execution. We investigate whether these findings are robust to fast versus slow markets, the volatility of daily returns, and aggregate depth relative to daily volume.

1 Bookmark
 · 
59 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper examines how liquidity in two actively traded futures markets has been affected by the onset of the financial crisis that began on August 9, 2007. We measure changes to trading volumes, spreads, and the level and shape of order books and document that these traditional measures imply a dramatic withdrawal of liquidity from Eurodollar futures markets, which previously could have been argued to be one of the most liquid financial markets in the world. By contrast, liquidity in another liquid market, S&P 500 index futures, was far less affected. Trading volume of S&P futures actually rose substantially, and spreads and order book liquidity changed by only a fraction of what was witnessed in Eurodollars. A deeper investigation into high-frequency trading strategies finds that prior to the crisis, liquidity additions and withdrawals rapidly restored symmetry to the electronic limit order book in both Eurodollar and S&P 500 futures markets. Following August 9, 2007, these strategies changed in the two markets in opposite ways, with patterns consistent with aggressive liquidity traders more likely to wait on the sidelines in Eurodollar markets, yet maintain or enhance their activity in equity futures. We offer an explanation of these findings, suggesting that the crisis affected the liquidity of these two liquid markets in different ways because of (1) different adverse selection risks, (2) different availability of market substitutes, and (3) different clienteles that serve as the typical marginal provider of liquidity.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We investigate the effect of broker anonymity on the information content of the limit order book on the Australian Stock Exchange. We argue that the move to anonymity has stronger impact on institutional than individual investors. We document that anonymity increases the informativeness of institutional limit orders about future volatility but has little effect on individual limit orders. Our findings imply that anonymity allows institutional investors to display informative orders in the limit order book. Prices, however, adjust less sufficiently to institutional investors’ order flow. Overall, anonymity may improve liquidity but it comes at the cost of reduced price efficiency.
    Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money 05/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We investigate the information content of the limit order book (LOB) on the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SHSE), a purely order-driven market. We find strong evidence that the LOB slope consistently and significantly predicts the future price volatility. However, this predictive power of the LOB declines during extreme market wide movements. We also find that buy orders are more informative over future price volatility than sell orders, but sell (buy) orders become more informative during extreme market wide down (up) movement days. Finally, we document that the predictive power of the LOB is short lived and markets are efficient over the longer time horizon. These results are helpful in understanding market efficiency and the traders’ order submission strategies on the fast growing market of SHSE.
    Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 04/2014; · 0.55 Impact Factor