Does cross-ownership affect competition?: Evidence from the Italian banking industry

Dipartimento di Economia e Statistica, Università della Calabria, Ponte P. Bucci, Cubo 1-C, 87036 Arcavacata di Rende (CS), Italy
Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money (Impact Factor: 0.89). 02/2007; 17(1):79-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2005.09.001
Source: RePEc


The purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate the effects of cross-ownership among Italian banks on competition in the national banking sector. This aim is pursued by measuring and comparing the degree of competition between banks involved in the web of cross-ownership and banks that are not involved. The bank's degree of competition is measured by applying the methodology developed by [Panzar, J.C., Rosse, J.N., 1987. Testing for monopoly equilibrium. Journal of Industrial Economics 35, 443–456.] The econometric results provide empirical evidence that, in the period 1996–2000, Italian banks involved in cross-ownership were less competitive than the other national credit firms, thus supporting the view that cross-ownership may represent an obstacle to industrial competition.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A perceived simultaneous increase in consolidation and competition in banking systems around the world has intensified public policy debates on the nexus between consolidation and competition on one hand, and bank soundness on the other hand. In light of these developments, this paper reviews and evaluates the contemporary literature on the effect of structural and nonstructural measures of competition on bank soundness. While the established literature points toward negative trade-offs between competition and bank soundness, this review concludes that recent studies increasingly bolster the view that competition is beneficial for bank stability. This paper starts out with a survey of key studies from the literature on competition, concentration, and soundness. I then provide an assessment of the underlying concepts in the industrial organization literature and review alternatives to the Structure-Conduct-Performance paradigm that dominates the extant literature. Second, I point out several issues that have been widely ignored in contemporary studies but that are critical for public policy recommendations. Finally, I suggest some avenues for future research.
    12/2008: pages 133-153;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper investigates the degree of market power in Middle East and North Africa (MENA) banking systems where research on competitive conditions is scant. The banking sectors of MENA countries are highly concentrated and they present unique characteristics in terms of ownership, structure and growth potential. The degree of competitiveness is assessed based on the revenue elasticity to input prices approach, and is related to a set of market and contestability indicators. The results show that, except for countries in North Africa where monopolistic conditions are found, the prevailing market structure in MENA banking is mostly monopolistically competitive. In line with the finding on other emerging and developed countries, assuring greater market contestability by allowing more foreign bank participation and reducing activity restrictions on banks is most important to guaranteeing competitiveness in the highly concentrated banking systems of the MENA region.
    The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 05/2009; 49(2):693-710. DOI:10.1016/j.qref.2008.03.002
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper aims to study the effect of banking competition on Latin American banks' risk-taking and whether capitalization and size changes this relationship. We conclude that: (1) competition affects risk in a non-linear manner: high/low (average) competition are related to more (less) stability; (2) bank's size explains the advantage from competition, while capitalization is only positive for larger banks in this case; (3) capital ratio explains the advantage from lower competition. These results are of uttermost importance for bank regulation, especially due to the recent turmoil in worldwide financial markets.
    Journal of Banking & Finance 12/2012; 36(12). DOI:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.07.022 · 1.29 Impact Factor
Show more