Does cross-ownership affect competition?: Evidence from the Italian banking industry

Dipartimento di Economia e Statistica, Università della Calabria, Ponte P. Bucci, Cubo 1-C, 87036 Arcavacata di Rende (CS), Italy
Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money 02/2007; DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2005.09.001
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate the effects of cross-ownership among Italian banks on competition in the national banking sector. This aim is pursued by measuring and comparing the degree of competition between banks involved in the web of cross-ownership and banks that are not involved. The bank's degree of competition is measured by applying the methodology developed by [Panzar, J.C., Rosse, J.N., 1987. Testing for monopoly equilibrium. Journal of Industrial Economics 35, 443–456.] The econometric results provide empirical evidence that, in the period 1996–2000, Italian banks involved in cross-ownership were less competitive than the other national credit firms, thus supporting the view that cross-ownership may represent an obstacle to industrial competition.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper aims to study the effect of banking competition on Latin American banks' risk-taking and whether capitalization and size changes this relationship. We conclude that: (1) competition affects risk in a non-linear manner: high/low (average) competition are related to more (less) stability; (2) bank's size explains the advantage from competition, while capitalization is only positive for larger banks in this case; (3) capital ratio explains the advantage from lower competition. These results are of uttermost importance for bank regulation, especially due to the recent turmoil in worldwide financial markets.
    Journal of Banking & Finance 12/2012; 36(12). DOI:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.07.022 · 1.29 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Arab banking sectors are characterised by high level of concentration, which could have a negative impact on competition and the competitive behaviour of banks according to the Structure-Conduct-Performance paradigm. Using a flexible translog revenue function, we found that high concentration has not provided Arab banks with significant market power. Besides, we found a higher competitive behaviour of banks operating in Lebanon, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and the UAE than in the other Arab countries.
    International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 03/2013;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This is the first study to explore the determinants of the egocentric lending networks of stock listed companies in China. Egocentric lending networks are constructed using the public loan announcements of firms listed on China's two stock exchanges combined with cross-ownership shares connecting the lending institutions. The data cover 2060 observations over the period from 2007 to 2012. The study shows that large, high-growth firms and firms with low leverage are more likely to have less-constrained lending networks. In contrast, highly indebted firms with poor performance tend to have more-constrained bank networks. The lending networks of firms with higher shares of state ownership, however, are not significantly related to leverage, suggesting that partly state-owned corporations in China still enjoy privileged access to bank financing in spite of substantial reforms and growing competition in China's banking sector.


Available from