Protective association and breeding advantages of choughs nesting in lesser kestrel colonies

Estación Biológica de Doñana (C.S.I.C.), Sevilla
Animal Behaviour (Impact Factor: 3.07). 09/1997; 54(2):335-342. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0465
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Some bird species may breed close to aggressive predators to reduce predation risk by more dangerous, generalist predators. We tested this protective nesting association hypothesis by studying solitary choughs,Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocoraxbreeding within or outside lesser kestrel,Falco naumannicolonies in northern Spain (1993–1994). We found 27 potential predators of choughs and kestrels and confirmed predation on adults and nests of both species by at least eight common predators. We experimentally assessed the defence investment of choughs and kestrels towards a stuffed eagle owl,Bubo buboin 19 buildings shared by both species. Lesser kestrels were more efficient at detecting the predator, and defended more vigorously than choughs. Choughs clearly selected for breeding buildings where lesser kestrel colonies were installed. Breeding success of these choughs was much higher than that of choughs breeding alone, because of a lower percentage of nest failure. Benefits to choughs probably accrued from both the ‘parasitism’ of the kestrels' nest defence and the dilution of predation risk in the colonies. Since lesser kestrels do not prey on choughs, this could be a good example of protective nesting association in birds.

Download full-text


Available from: José L Tella, Jun 23, 2015
  • Source
    Hystrix 12/2014; 25(2):121-123. · 0.59 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: All birds construct nests in which to lay eggs and/or raise offspring. Traditionally, it was thought that natural selection and the requirement to minimize the risk of predation determined the design of completed nests. However, it is becoming increasingly apparent that sexual selection also influences nest design. This is an important development as while species such as bowerbirds build structures that are extended phenotypic signals whose sole purpose is to attract a mate, nests contain eggs and/or offspring, thereby suggesting a direct tradeoff between the conflicting requirements of natural and sexual selection. Nest design also varies adaptively in order to both minimize the detrimental effects of parasites and to create a suitable microclimate for parents and developing offspring in relation to predictable variation in environmental conditions. Our understanding of the design and function of birds’ nests has increased considerably in recent years, and the evidence suggests that nests have four nonmutually exclusive functions. Consequently, we conclude that the design of birds’ nests is far more sophisticated than previously realized and that nests are multifunctional structures that have important fitness consequences for the builder/s.
    Ecology and Evolution 10/2014; 4(20). DOI:10.1002/ece3.1054 · 1.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Capsule Red-billed Choughs showed strict mate and high nest-site fidelity. Changes of mate or nesting site were recorded only in cases of widowhood or collapse of the nesting sites (buildings). Aims To evaluate the relationships between mate fidelity, nest-site fidelity, breeding dispersal and widowhood in a population of Red-billed Choughs. Methods We recorded the rates of mate and nest site fidelity in a ringed population Red-billed Choughs breeding in the Ebro Valley, NE Spain, from 1987-2006. Results We found strict mate fidelity, because no case of divorce was recorded over variable periods of mate pairing, ranging from 2 to 15 years. A proportion of widowed individuals changed nesting sites when re-paired, always establishing nests in places close to their previous nesting sites. We did not find sexual differences in the decision to change nesting site in newly paired widowed individuals, although widowed males tend to show higher site fidelity and lower breeding dispersal distances than females. Conclusions The results support the hypothesis that site fidelity primarily depends on mate fidelity, rather than the contrary. Mate and nest-site fidelity may be species-specific traits that enhance fitness through the shared knowledge of the characteristics and limitations of the mate and the territory in this long-lived species.
    Bird Study 07/2014; 61:371-377. DOI:10.1080/00063657.2014.927819 · 1.03 Impact Factor