Protective association and breeding advantages of choughs nesting in lesser kestrel colonies

Departamento de Biologı́a Animal, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares; Estación Biológica de Doñana (C.S.I.C.), Sevilla
Animal Behaviour (Impact Factor: 3.07). 09/1997; DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0465
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Some bird species may breed close to aggressive predators to reduce predation risk by more dangerous, generalist predators. We tested this protective nesting association hypothesis by studying solitary choughs,Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocoraxbreeding within or outside lesser kestrel,Falco naumannicolonies in northern Spain (1993–1994). We found 27 potential predators of choughs and kestrels and confirmed predation on adults and nests of both species by at least eight common predators. We experimentally assessed the defence investment of choughs and kestrels towards a stuffed eagle owl,Bubo buboin 19 buildings shared by both species. Lesser kestrels were more efficient at detecting the predator, and defended more vigorously than choughs. Choughs clearly selected for breeding buildings where lesser kestrel colonies were installed. Breeding success of these choughs was much higher than that of choughs breeding alone, because of a lower percentage of nest failure. Benefits to choughs probably accrued from both the ‘parasitism’ of the kestrels' nest defence and the dilution of predation risk in the colonies. Since lesser kestrels do not prey on choughs, this could be a good example of protective nesting association in birds.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The breeding abundance of Choughs Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax was investigated in relation to type of rock and related features of nesting cliffs along rivers in south-eastern Madrid (Central Spain). Gypsum cliffs are larger and provide more nest sites than clay and limestone cliffs. Cliffs used by breeding Choughs contained more available nest sites per length than unoccupied cliffs, but this was mainly due to the greater height of the occupied cliffs, since the number of available nest sites per area did not differ. Large cavities and crevices, which were also used as communal roosting sites, were positively selected. Most of the variation in breeding density could be explained by variation in the availability of nest sites in general, and of large caves and crevices in particular. When nest-sites are widely available, positive selection for cliffs that allow a clumped distribution of nests might result in aggregated breeding and a social organization needed for exploitation of feeding resources around cliffs. So it is the high nest-site availability that allows Choughs to occur at densities much higher than those re-corded in montane areas in the Mediterranean and in coastal areas of northern Europe. This implies that the role of nesting habitat in the social organization, population dynamics and conservation of Choughs differs between areas.
    Ardea -Wageningen- 01/1998; 86(2):237-244. · 0.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: All birds construct nests in which to lay eggs and/or raise offspring. Traditionally, it was thought that natural selection and the requirement to minimize the risk of predation determined the design of completed nests. However, it is becoming increasingly apparent that sexual selection also influences nest design. This is an important development as while species such as bowerbirds build structures that are extended phenotypic signals whose sole purpose is to attract a mate, nests contain eggs and/or offspring, thereby suggesting a direct tradeoff between the conflicting requirements of natural and sexual selection. Nest design also varies adaptively in order to both minimize the detrimental effects of parasites and to create a suitable microclimate for parents and developing offspring in relation to predictable variation in environmental conditions. Our understanding of the design and function of birds’ nests has increased considerably in recent years, and the evidence suggests that nests have four nonmutually exclusive functions. Consequently, we conclude that the design of birds’ nests is far more sophisticated than previously realized and that nests are multifunctional structures that have important fitness consequences for the builder/s.
    Ecology and Evolution 09/2014; · 1.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Bird Study 07/2014; 61:371-377. · 1.03 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 5, 2014