Article

Protective association and breeding advantages of choughs nesting in lesser kestrel colonies

Estación Biológica de Doñana (C.S.I.C.), Sevilla
Animal Behaviour (Impact Factor: 3.07). 09/1997; DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0465
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Some bird species may breed close to aggressive predators to reduce predation risk by more dangerous, generalist predators. We tested this protective nesting association hypothesis by studying solitary choughs,Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocoraxbreeding within or outside lesser kestrel,Falco naumannicolonies in northern Spain (1993–1994). We found 27 potential predators of choughs and kestrels and confirmed predation on adults and nests of both species by at least eight common predators. We experimentally assessed the defence investment of choughs and kestrels towards a stuffed eagle owl,Bubo buboin 19 buildings shared by both species. Lesser kestrels were more efficient at detecting the predator, and defended more vigorously than choughs. Choughs clearly selected for breeding buildings where lesser kestrel colonies were installed. Breeding success of these choughs was much higher than that of choughs breeding alone, because of a lower percentage of nest failure. Benefits to choughs probably accrued from both the ‘parasitism’ of the kestrels' nest defence and the dilution of predation risk in the colonies. Since lesser kestrels do not prey on choughs, this could be a good example of protective nesting association in birds.

Full-text

Available from: José L Tella, Mar 31, 2015
0 Bookmarks
 · 
214 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The breeding abundance of Choughs Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax was investigated in relation to type of rock and related features of nesting cliffs along rivers in south-eastern Madrid (Central Spain). Gypsum cliffs are larger and provide more nest sites than clay and limestone cliffs. Cliffs used by breeding Choughs contained more available nest sites per length than unoccupied cliffs, but this was mainly due to the greater height of the occupied cliffs, since the number of available nest sites per area did not differ. Large cavities and crevices, which were also used as communal roosting sites, were positively selected. Most of the variation in breeding density could be explained by variation in the availability of nest sites in general, and of large caves and crevices in particular. When nest-sites are widely available, positive selection for cliffs that allow a clumped distribution of nests might result in aggregated breeding and a social organization needed for exploitation of feeding resources around cliffs. So it is the high nest-site availability that allows Choughs to occur at densities much higher than those re-corded in montane areas in the Mediterranean and in coastal areas of northern Europe. This implies that the role of nesting habitat in the social organization, population dynamics and conservation of Choughs differs between areas.
    Ardea -Wageningen- 01/1998; 86(2):237-244. · 0.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Hystrix 12/2014; 25(2):121-123. · 0.35 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Protective nesting association between the Barred Warbler Sylvia nisoria and the Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio: an experiment using artificial and natural nests Abstract The pressure of predators may significantly affects the distribution pattern of nesting birds. Some individuals may reduce the risk of predation by nesting near other species with an aggressive nest defence. In the present study I tested the predator protection hypothesis using experimental (artificial nests) and observational (real nests) approaches on two ecologically similar pas-serine birds–the Barred Warbler Sylvia nisoria and the Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio. Studies have been conducted in eastern Poland in two types of habitat: river valley and farmland. The main predators of natural and artificial nests were birds, and to a lesser extent, also mammals. I found wide variation level of predation of both types of nests in different years. Nest survival rate of artificial nests was significantly lower in the farmland than in the river valley and in natural nests I observed reverse pattern. According to the predictions of the predator protection hypothesis the survival rates of the natural and artificial nests were significantly higher in territories of individuals breeding in the protective nesting association. This type of interspecific positive interaction between two associate species can be classi-fied as facultative mutualism.
    Ecological Research 09/2014; DOI:10.1007/s11284-014-1183-9 · 1.51 Impact Factor