Racial and economic segregation and educational outcomes: one tale—Two cities

Temple University, USA
Applied Behavioral Science Review 01/1995; DOI: 10.1016/S1068-8595(95)80002-6

ABSTRACT This paper reports the research examining racial and economic segregation of public schools in Philadelphia and Houston. Three factors effect the racial and economic composition of public schools: (1) the economic and racial/ethnic segregation of urban neighborhoods; (2) private school attendance among higher status and white students; and (3) varying rates of participation in magnet school programs. The evidence suggests that magnet school programs may attenuate racial segregation while exacerbating economic segregation. An examination of the relative importance of racial and economic composition of schools upon student achievement indicates that the economic composition of schools is the more important determinant of achievement levels. Given the propensity of magnet school programs to exacerbate socioeconomic concentrations, these programs should be reformulated.

26 Reads
  • Source
    • "X i is a vector of variables relating the quality of the school the student attends. As noted above, work by Peng, Wright, and Hill (1995), by Yancey and Saporito (1997), and by Battistich et al. (1995) "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives. Several studies, such as Hoberman (1997) and Leeds (2003), have claimed that success in the athletic arena has distorted the human capital decisions of young black men. We test this hypothesis by determining how participation in interscholastic athletics affects the study habits of black and white youths. Methods. We build a theoretical model that allows youths to invest in athletic or academic human capital. We test this model using data from the National Educational Longitudinal Survey and accounting for possible self-selection bias. Results. We find that athletic participation does not have a statistically significant impact on the amount of time young black men and women spend studying. The impact for young white men and women is positive and significant, though the impact of playing football and basketball does have a negative impact for young white men. Conclusions. Participating in interscholastic athletics does not have the pervasive negative impact on young black men that Hoberman (1997) and Leeds (2003) claim. The expected negative impact of basketball and football—the so-called money sports—exists for young white men, though this is offset by the positive impact of participation in athletics per se.
    Social Science Quarterly 09/2007; 88(3):729-744. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00480.x · 0.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper focuses on the problem of educational segregation within schools and shows how the continued use of categorical, “pull-out” programs exacerbates risks associated with poverty. It is suggested that educational segregation, as it disproportionately affects minority and poor children, is perhaps the civil rights issue facing the United States today due to increased diversity and worsening poverty in the inner cities. A strategy for systemic reform in schools is presented which is connected to the context of community as well as to efforts for long-term structural change. Reform recommendations are introduced that are linked to suggestions for collaborative political work and community organizing which could be used to effectively impact educational equity issues related to both segregation and poverty. Last, prospects for change during the remainder of the decade are analyzed with attention being directed toward the political mood of the mid-1990s and continued economic decline. It is suggested that contrary to pundits who see this period as one where radical change is almost impossible, we are currently facing a window of opportunity where the historical circumstances are ideal for significant reforms which could lead to increased educational equity for poor children and youth.
    Journal of Poverty 01/1998; 2(1):79-100. DOI:10.1300/J134v02n01_04
Show more