Acoustics, context and function of vibrational signalling in a Lycaenid butterfly-ant mutualism

Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University
Animal Behaviour (Impact Factor: 3.14). 08/2000; 60(1):13-26. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1364
Source: PubMed


Juveniles of the Australian common imperial blue butterfly, Jalmenus evagoras, produce substrate-borne vibrational signals in the form of two kinds of pupal calls and three larval calls. Pupae stridulate in the presence of conspecific larvae, when attended by an ant guard, and as a reaction against perturbation. Using pupal pairs in which one member was experimentally muted, pupal calls were shown to be important in ant attraction and the maintenance of an ant guard. A pupa may use calls to regulate levels of its attendant ants and to signal its potential value in these mutualistic interactions. Therefore substrate-borne vibrations play a significant role in the communication between J. evagoras and its attendant ants and pupal calls appear to be more than just signals acting as a predator deterrent. Similarly, caterpillars make more sound when attended by Iridomyrmex anceps, suggesting that larval calls may be important in mediating ant symbioses. One larval call has the same mean dominant frequency, pulse rate, bandwidth and pulse length as the primary signal of a pupa, suggesting a similarity in function.

Download full-text


Available from: Naomi E Pierce,
    • "Lycaenid immatures have a variety of other adaptations for entraining ant attendance. Some larvae and pupae produce substrate-borne vibrations that attract ants (Downey & Allyn, 1973; DeVries, 1990; Travassos & Pierce, 2000), and at least one parasitic species that lives in ant nests mimics the vibrational signals of the ant queen (Barbero et al., 2009). Many species also have dendritic setae, although the function of these is still a matter of debate (Common & Waterhouse, 1981). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Caterpillars of the lycaenid butterfly, Liphyra brassolis, live inside the nests of arboreal weaver ants, Oecophylla smaragdina, and eat their brood. Observations of mature larvae suggest that they are impervious to relentless ant molestation, yet they lack sclerotized cuticular plates. We document a novel form of integumental defence that imparts protection from ant attack whilst maintaining the flexibility necessary to walk with a hydraulic skeleton. Analysis of the trunk integument and cuticular structures of early and late instars of L. brassolis using light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and histology revealed three new setae types (disc, clavate, and lanceolate), as well as three new cuticular structures (pored sockets, cuticular pores, and cuticular domes). The unique cuticle is covered with lanceolate setae, which act as endocuticular struts, and overlapping scale-like sockets, which form a hard, flexible integument. The imperfect armour of the early-instar larvae suggests that abundant, putatively secretory pores are likely to be homologous to pore cupola organs (PCOs) found in other lycaenid larvae and thus may exude semiochemicals to allay ant aggression. The importance of these pores presumably wanes as structural (setal) cuticular defenses are reinforced in later instars, when adult ants have been observed attacking caterpillars to no avail. The caterpillar's antennae are unusual and seem to be involved in manipulating ant larvae into the caterpillar's mouth. Behavioural observations indicate that the dexterity of these structures is associated with eating ants (myrmecophagy).
    Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 10/2015; DOI:10.1111/bij.12656 · 2.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The DNO secrete nutritious droplets for ants, and the TOs are assumed to secrete volatile substances that attract and alert ants [8], [21]. In addition to these ant-associated organs, many lycaenids also stridulate to communicate with their attendant ants [22], [23]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Regulation via interspecific communication is an important for the maintenance of many mutualisms. However, mechanisms underlying the evolution of partner communication are poorly understood for many mutualisms. Here we show, in an ant-lycaenid butterfly mutualism, that attendant ants selectively learn to recognize and interact cooperatively with a partner. Workers of the ant Pristomyrmex punctatus learn to associate cuticular hydrocarbons of mutualistic Narathura japonica caterpillars with food rewards and, as a result, are more likely to tend the caterpillars. However, the workers do not learn to associate the cuticular hydrocarbons of caterpillars of a non-ant-associated lycaenid, Lycaena phlaeas, with artificial food rewards. Chemical analysis revealed cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of the mutualistic caterpillars were complex compared with those of non-ant-associated caterpillars. Our results suggest that partner-recognition based on partner-specific chemical signals and cognitive abilities of workers are important mechanisms underlying the evolution and maintenance of mutualism with ants.
    PLoS ONE 01/2014; 9(1):e86054. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0086054 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Myrmica sabuleti, M. scabrinodis, and M. schencki have differences between worker and queen stridulations, and some nest parasite caterpillars can mimic queen stridulations more than those of workers and thereby receive increased attention from workers (Barbero et al., 2009). In a similar ant-parasite system, Travassos and Pierce (2000) specify that they use the terms ''sounds'' and ''calls'' for simplicity when describing substrate-borne vibrations. Species differ in sound level and distance at which stridulations are perceptible (Markl, 1965; Spangler, 1967). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Vibrations and sounds, collectively called vibroacoustics, play significant roles in intracolony communication in termites, social wasps, ants, and social bees. Modalities of vibroacoustic signal production include stridulation, gross body movements, wing movements, high-frequency muscle contractions without wing movements, and scraping mandibles or tapping body parts on resonant substrates. Vibroacoustic signals are perceived primarily via Johnston’s organs in the antennae and subgenual organs in the legs. Substrate vibrations predominate as vibroacoustic modalities, with only honey bees having been shown to be able to hear airborne sound. Vibroacoustic messages include alarm, recruitment, colony activation, larval provisioning cues, and food resource assessment. This review describes the modalities and their behavioral contexts rather than electrophysiological aspects, therefore placing emphasis on the adaptive roles of vibroacoustic communication. Although much vibroacoustics research has been done, numerous opportunities exist for continuations and new directions in vibroacoustics research.
    Insectes Sociaux 11/2013; 60(4). DOI:10.1007/s00040-013-0311-9 · 1.02 Impact Factor
Show more