A survey and analysis on public awareness and performance for promoting circular economy in China: A case study from Tianjin

College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, 94 Weijin Road, 300071 Tianjin, PR China
Journal of Cleaner Production (Impact Factor: 3.59). 01/2009; DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.06.003

ABSTRACT The main objective of this study is to create a better understanding of public awareness and performance in the promotion of a Circular Economy (CE) in Tianjin, China. The data and information used in this paper were collected by distributing questionnaires randomly in 6 urban districts and interviewing 600 respondents. The results indicate that the residents have limited awareness and a poor understanding about the CE program. However, they hold a positive attitude toward garbage sorting while most of the residents simply classify the garbage into categories that can be sold, reused or exchanged for new ones. People's awareness of the CE program has a positive correlation to their educational level, whereas their pro-environmental and resource conservation behavior has a positive correlation to the age of the respondents.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The main objective of this study is to evaluate public knowledge and awareness about the impact of waste from electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) on health and environment, their willingness to pay (WTP) for improving WEEE management in Kuala Lumpur, the household electric and electronic equipment's (EEE) product lifetime, the reasons to update, and the deposit and disposal processes of WEEE, and to discuss these results within the context of proper management of WEEE. The data and information used in this study were collected by distributing questionnaires randomly in 5 residential areas in Kuala Lumpur, and interviewing 350 households. The results indicate that the majority of the households (59%) have knowledge about the environmental and health impacts of WEEE. More than half of the households (65%) stated that they considered the environmental factors when they purchased EEE for domestic use. Unfortunately, despite their knowledge about WEEE, only between 2% and 3% of the households were involved in the recycling of their WEEE. However, 52.5% of the households were willing to pay for improving WEEE management system in Kuala Lumpur. This study suggested that the government could manage the WEEE by passing effective legislations; setting up convenient collection centers for proper disposal of WEEE; and organizing campaigns, seminars and workshops to increase the level of awareness of the households and to motive them to recycle their WEEE.
    Journal of Cleaner Production 08/2013; 52:185-193. · 3.59 Impact Factor
  • Polish Journal of Chemical Technology 06/2013; · 0.47 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper discusses China’s policy of developing an ecologically based circular economy (CE). In this paper, CE is understood as the environmental dimension of the wider vision of China as a ‘harmonious society’, formulated by the 16th Party Congress in 2002 in response to the social and environmental problems following in the wake of the unfettered economic growth policy of China after Mao Zedong’s death in 1976. The 18th Party Congress of CCP in 2012 further strengthened the official resolve to develop China as an ‘ecological civilization’ characterized by harmony between man and nature under the epitome ‘Beautiful China’. The paper discusses CE in this wider context. It is based on a review of literature on CE available in English. The aim is to present a more comprehensive understanding and critique of the Chinese version of CE as part of a wider policy for socioeconomic transformation and development of an ecologically based society, than has so far been done. The paper concludes by discussing bottlenecks and challenges confronting the implementation of CE in this wider socioeconomic context. The main problems are claimed to be the challenge of implementing CE as a top-down social engineering process and the lack of civil society involvement.
    The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 07/2014; 21(4). · 1.77 Impact Factor


Available from