Robust designs for misspecified logistic models

Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2G1
Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (Impact Factor: 0.6). 01/2009; DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2008.05.022
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT We develop criteria that generate robust designs and use such criteria for the construction of designs that insure against possible misspecifications in logistic regression models. The design criteria we propose are different from the classical in that we do not focus on sampling error alone. Instead we use design criteria that account as well for error due to bias engendered by the model misspecification. Our robust designs optimize the average of a function of the sampling error and bias error over a specified misspecification neighbourhood. Examples of robust designs for logistic models are presented, including a case study implementing the methodologies using beetle mortality data.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this article is to evaluate and compare designs for multivariate generalized linear models using quantile dispersion graphs when the linear predictor is misspecified. The uncertainty in the linear predictor is represented by an unknown function. The comparison of the designs are based on a scalar-valued function of the mean square error of prediction (MSEP) matrix, which incorporates both variance and bias of the prediction caused by the misspecification in the linear predictor. For a given design, quantiles of the largest eigenvalue of the MSEP matrix are obtained within a certain region of interest. The quantiles depend on the unknown parameters of the linear predictor and the unknown function assumed to be the cause of model misspecification. If initial data is available, the unknown function is estimated using multivariate parametric kriging. To address the dependence of the quantiles on the unknown parameters, a 100(1-α)% confidence region of the parameters is computed and used as a parameter space. A numerical example based on multinomial response models is presented to illustrate the methodology.
    Statistics in Science, Business, and Engineering (ICSSBE), 2012 International Conference on; 01/2012
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stated choice methods have been widely used in transportation studies since 1980s. In recent years, much research attention has been paid to develop optimal or efficient designs for choice experiments, such as the so-called D-optimal design, which does not seek for orthogonality as the traditional approach does but aims at minimizing the determinant of the variance-covariance matrix of the parameter estimators. This paper examines the statistical properties of an alternative design method—uniform design, which also does not look for orthogonality but aims at maximizing uniformity—a measure that is closely related to model efficiency. We compare the estimation efficiency and prediction efficiency of uniform design with that of the traditional fractional factorial orthogonal design in stated choice modelling. Monte Carlo experiments are used to generate models, whose parameters vary in scale. The results show that though uniform design uses a lot fewer profiles than orthogonal designs do, its prediction and estimation efficiencies in stated choice modelling are comparable to that of orthogonal design.
    Transport Reviews 09/2009; 29(5). DOI:10.1080/01441640902829454 · 1.88 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Disagreement among researchers regarding types of optimal choice experiments is often best seen as resulting from differences in the set of assumptions researchers are willing to make about the underlying data generating process. Much of the current debate may have confused, rather than enlightened applied researchers because the underlying source of the debate lacks transparency. We argue that this debate would be better served if it were much more closely tied to the large existing literature on optimal design of experiments, where many of the issues currently being discussed have long been examined. We further argue that the current debate misses several key issues that are likely to be important to making progress in understanding the role played by experimental designs in applied settings of interest in economics, marketing and transportation research.
    01/2011; 4(1):1–8. DOI:10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70016-2

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Oct 24, 2014