Article

Adjustment factors for the ASHRAE clear-sky model based on solar-radiation measurements in Riyadh

Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
Applied Energy (Impact Factor: 5.26). 10/2004; DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2003.11.005

ABSTRACT The solar-radiation variation over horizontal surfaces calculated by the ASHRAE clear-sky model is compared with measurements for Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Both model results and measurements are averaged on an hourly basis for all days in each month of the year to get a monthly-averaged hourly variation of the solar flux. The measured data are further averaged over the years 1996–2000. The ASHRAE model implemented utilizes the standard values of the coefficients proposed in the original model. Calculations are also made with a different set of coefficients proposed in the literature. The results show that the ASHRAE model calculations generally over-predict the measured data particularly for the months of October → May. A daily total solar-flux is obtained by integrating the hourly distribution. Based on the daily total flux, a factor Φ (<1) is obtained for every month to adjust the calculated clear-sky flux in order to account for the effects of local weather-conditions. When the ASHRAE model calculations are multiplied by this factor, the results agree very well with the measured monthly-averaged hourly variation of the solar flux. It is recommended that these adjustment factors be employed when the ASHRAE clear-sky model is used for solar radiation calculations in Riyadh and localities of similar environmental conditions. Instantaneous, daily and yearly solar-radiation on various surfaces, such as building walls and flat-plate solar collectors, can then be conveniently calculated using the adjusted model for different orientations and inclination angles. The model also allows the beam, diffuse and ground-reflected solar-radiation components to be determined separately. Sample results characterizing the solar radiation in Riyadh are presented by using the “adjusted” ASHRAE model.

3 Followers
 · 
1,067 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this study, the solar radiation variation on horizontal surfaces calcu-lated by the ASHRAE clear-sky model is compared with measurements for Erzurum, Turkey (latitude: 39.55; longitude: 41.15; altitude: 1,869 m). A daily total solar radiation is obtained by integrating the hourly distribution. The results show that the ASHRAE clear-sky model is suitable to estimate hourly solar radiation in Erzurum, Turkey. Also, correlations giving the monthly average clear sky solar radiation on horizontal surfaces are developed. In addition, mean bias error, root mean square error, and t-statistic methods are used to indicate model performance.
    Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects 01/2009; 31(3). DOI:10.1080/15567030701522534 · 0.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Solar radiation is a function of various parameters viz., solar altitude, location (latitude and longitude), site altitude, albedo, atmospheric transmittance and cloudiness. However, clear sky solar radiation is independent of cloudiness index. Analyzing the solar radiation variation on a clear day provides a basis for comparison of cloudiness index for days falling under different sky conditions. Solar radiation (global, diffuse and direct) variation on horizontal surfaces is presently calculated using ASHRAE clear-sky model. The calculated values are validated against the measurements for Aligarh, India (27.88˚N, 78.08˚E, 192 m.s.l.). Mean bias error, root mean square error and t-statistics methods are used to analyze model performance. The results show that the ASHRAE clear-sky model is suitable to estimate hourly solar radiation in Aligarh, India.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In renewably powered remote hydrogen generation systems, on-site water production is essential so as to service electrolysis in hydrogen systems which may not have recourse to shipments of de-ionised water. Whilst the inclusion of small Reverse Osmosis (RO) units may function as a (useful) dump load, it also directly impacts the power management of remote hydrogen generation systems affecting operational characteristics. This research investigates the impact on the hydrogen generation system when simulations utilise different methods to account for solar power needed to drive the system as well as varying scales of (short-term) battery capacity. The simulations, in MATLAB/Simulink, utilise two specific methods of irradiance prediction (ASHRAE clear sky model and Neural Networks) and are benchmarked against measured irradiance data for Geraldton (Western Australia). This imposes different levels of accuracy and intermittency. Laboratory testing and device-level models help simulate the operational characteristics of a hydrogen generation system including on-site water production. Operational characteristics studied include: total energy available for PEM electrolysis, ontime of the electrolyser in steady-state, the number of start/stop cycles for the electrolyser and its duty factor (litres of hydrogen generated over the total number of start/stops). Results show that increasing systems' battery capacity only affects the operational characteristics of a PEM electrolyser up to a threshold capacity (Ah). Increasing battery capacity generally allows for more renewable energy penetration. Additionally, the hydrogen generation system behaviour is (generally) more accurately predicted, across all battery capacities, when Neural Networks are used to predict the availability of solar irradiance. The ability to predict accurate levels of solar irradiance becomes more important in winter when irradiance is at its lowest. The results also highlight the need to use highly resolved (temporal) simulations which are able to better capture device-level operational characteristics. Copyright
    International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 09/2013; 38(28):12253-12265. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.07.031 · 2.93 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
51 Downloads
Available from