Mapping Motor Inhibition: Conjunctive Brain Activations across Different Versions of Go/No-Go and Stop Tasks

Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London
NeuroImage (Impact Factor: 6.36). 03/2001; 13(2):250-261. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0685
Source: PubMed


Conjunctionanalysis methods were used in functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate brain regions commonly activated in subjects performing different versions of go/no-go and stop tasks, differing in probability of inhibitory signals and/or contrast conditions. Generic brain activation maps highlighted brain regions commonly activated in (a) two different go/no-go task versions, (b) three different stop task versions, and (c) all 5 inhibition task versions. Comparison between the generic activation maps of stop and go/no-go task versions revealed inhibitory mechanisms specific to go/no-go or stop task performance in 15 healthy, right-handed, male adults. In the go/no-go task a motor response had to be selectively executed or inhibited in either 50% or 30% of trials. In the stop task, the motor response to a go-stimulus had to be retracted on either 50 or 30% of trials, indicated by a stop signal, shortly (250 ms) following the go-stimulus. The shared “inhibitory” neurocognitive network by all inhibition tasks comprised mesial, medial, and inferior frontal and parietal cortices. Generic activation of the go/no-go task versions identified bilateral, but more predominantly left hemispheric mesial, medial, and inferior frontal and parietal cortices. Common activation to all stop task versions was in predominantly right hemispheric anterior cingulate, supplementary motor area, inferior prefrontal, and parietal cortices. On direct comparison between generic stop and go/no-go activation maps increased BOLD signal was observed in left hemispheric dorsolateral prefrontal, medial, and parietal cortices during the go/no-go task, presumably reflectinga left frontoparietal specialization for response selection.

Download full-text


Available from: Andy Simmons,
  • Source
    • "The go/no-go task (adapted from Rubia et al., 2001) consisted of two blocks of 150 trials each. The visual stimulus was a white arrow presented centrally on a black screen. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Evidence of the genetic correlates of inhibitory control is scant. Two previously studied dopamine-related polymorphisms, COMT rs4680 and the SLC6A3 3' UTR 40-base-pair VNTR (rs28363170), have been associated with response inhibition, however with inconsistent findings. Here, we investigated the influence of these two polymorphisms in a large healthy adult sample (N = 515) on a response inhibition battery including the antisaccade, stop-signal, go/no-go and Stroop tasks as well as a psychometric measure of impulsivity (Barratt Impulsiveness Scale) (Experiment 1). Additionally, a subsample (N = 144) was studied while performing the go/no-go, stop-signal and antisaccade tasks in 3T fMRI (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, we did not find any significant associations of COMT or SLC6A3 with inhibitory performance or impulsivity. In Experiment 2, no association of COMT with BOLD was found. However, there were consistent main effects of SLC6A3 genotype in all inhibitory contrasts: Homozygosity of the 10R allele was associated with greater fronto-striatal BOLD response than genotypes with at least one 9R allele. These findings are consistent with meta-analyses showing that the 10R allele is associated with reduced striatal dopamine transporter expression, which in animal studies has been found to lead to increased extracellular dopamine levels. Our study thus supports the involvement of striatal dopamine in the neural mechanisms of cognitive control, in particular response inhibition. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Cortex 10/2015; 71:219-231. DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.07.002 · 5.13 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Although it is not a given that EF task adaptations will retain the critical features of the original , multiple lines of evidence support the strength of these GNG variants for use with young children. For instance, studies indicate that the neural networks underlying children's GNG performance (Booth et al., 2003; Durston et al., 2002) broadly mirror that found with adults (albeit with children typically displaying greater degrees of activation; Garavan, Ross, Murphy, Roche, & Stein, 2002; Rubia et al., 2001). These modified GNG tasks also display good inter-task correlations with other established measures of inhibition and good reliability estimates (Simpson & Riggs, 2006; Wiebe et al., 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although researchers agree that the first 5 years of life are critical for children’s developing executive functions (EFs), further advances are hindered by a lack of consensus on the design and selection of developmentally appropriate EF tasks for young children. Given this debate, well-established adult measures of EF routinely have been adapted for young children. Given young children’s comparatively limited cognitive capacities, however, such adaptations do not guarantee that the task’s critical EF demands are retained. To investigate this possibility, the current study examined the characteristics that optimize measurement of young children’s EFs—specifically, their inhibitory control—using the go/no-go (GNG) task as an exemplar. Sixty preschoolers completed six GNG tasks differing in stimulus animation, presentation time, and response location. Comparison EF tasks were administered to examine concurrent validity of GNG variants. Results indicated effects of stimulus presentation time and response location, with animation further enhancing task validity and reliability. This suggests that current GNG tasks deflate estimates of young children’s ability to inhibit, with implications for future design and selection of developmentally appropriate EF tasks.
    Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 09/2015; DOI:10.1177/0734282914562933 · 1.05 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The detected activations for each task were highly consistent with previous studies of autobiographical memory (Spreng, Mar, & Kim, 2009; Summerfield, Hassabis, & Maguire, 2009), emotion judgment (Phan, Wager, Taylor, & Liberzon, 2002), inhibitory control (Wager et al., 2005; Rubia et al., 2001), working memory (Owen, McMillan, Laird, & Bullmore, 2005), and language (Burgund, Lugar, Miezin, & Petersen, 2003; Figure 1). In particular, the emotion judgment, inhibitory control, working memory, and language tasks each exhibited decreased task-related activity in regions consistent with the DMN (i.e., PCC, precuneus, medial pFC, middle temporal gyrus). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The default mode network (DMN) was first recognized as a set of brain regions demonstrating consistently greater activity during rest than during a multitude of tasks. Originally, this network was believed to interfere with goal-directed behavior based on its decreased activity during many such tasks. More recently, however, the role of the DMN during goal-directed behavior was established for internally oriented tasks, in which the DMN demonstrated increased activity. However, the well-documented hub position and information-bridging potential of midline DMN regions indicate there is more to uncover regarding its functional contributions to goal-directed tasks, which may be based on its functional interactions rather than its level of activation. An investigation of task-related changes in DMN functional connectivity during a series of both internal and external tasks would provide the requisite investigation for examining the role of the DMN during goal-directed task performance. In this study, 20 participants underwent fMRI while performing six tasks spanning diverse internal and external domains in addition to a resting-state scan. We hypothesized that the DMN would demonstrate "task-positive" (i.e., positively contributing to task performance) changes in functional connectivity relative to rest regardless of the direction of task-related changes in activity. Indeed, our results demonstrate significant increases in DMN connectivity with task-promoting regions (e.g., anterior insula, inferior frontal gyrus, middle frontal gyrus) across all six tasks. Furthermore, canonical correlation analyses indicated that the observed task-related connectivity changes were significantly associated with individual differences in task performance. Our results indicate that the DMN may not only support a "default" mode but may play a greater role in both internal and external tasks through flexible coupling with task-relevant brain regions.
    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 08/2015; 27(12):1-13. DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_00859 · 4.09 Impact Factor
Show more