Article

The annual cycle and biological effects of the Costa Rica Dome

NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Southwest Fisheries Science Center, P.O. Box 271, La Jolla, CA 92038, USA
Deep Sea Research Part I Oceanographic Research Papers (Impact Factor: 2.82). 02/2002; DOI: 10.1016/S0967-0637(01)00057-7

ABSTRACT The Costa Rica Dome is similar to other tropical thermocline domes in several respects: it is part of an east–west thermocline ridge associated with the equatorial circulation, surface currents flow cyclonically around it, and its seasonal evolution is affected by large-scale wind patterns. The Costa Rica Dome is unique because it is also forced by a coastal wind jet. Monthly climatological fields of thermocline depth and physical forcing variables (wind stress curl and surface current divergence) were analyzed to examine the structure and seasonal evolution of the dome. The annual cycle of the dome can be explained by wind forcing in four stages: (1) coastal shoaling of the thermocline off the Gulf of Papagayo during February–April, forced by Ekman pumping on the equatorward side of the Papagayo wind jet; (2) separation from the coast during May–June when the intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) moves north to the countercurrent thermocline ridge, the wind jet stops, and the North Equatorial Countercurrent extends toward the coast on the equatorward flank of the ridge; (3) countercurrent thermocline ridging during July–November, when the dome expands to the west as the countercurrent thermocline ridge shoals beneath a band of cyclonic wind stress curl on the poleward side of the ITCZ; and (4) deepening during December–January when the ITCZ moves south and strong trade winds blow over the dome. Coastal eddies may be involved in the coastal shoaling observed during February–March. A seasonally predictable, strong, and shallow thermocline makes the Costa Rica Dome a distinct biological habitat where phytoplankton and zooplankton biomass are higher than in surrounding tropical waters. The physical structure and biological productivity of the dome affect the distribution and feeding of whales and dolphins, probably through forage availability.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
115 Views
  • Source
    Journal of Climate 01/2013; 26(2):583-599. · 4.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Se evaluó la estructura (composición, abundancia, riqueza, diversidad, equitabilidad y dominancia) y relación con factores abióticos (temperatura, salinidad y transparencia) de la comunidad fitoplanctónica costera en Cabo Marzo y Punta Cruces, localidades ubicadas en el sector nororiental del Pacífico colombiano. Estas localidades han sido identificadas como sitios potenciales para el establecimiento de un área marino-costero de manejo especial. En total se identificaron 86 especies de fitoplancton en Cabo Marzo (51 diatomeas, 30 dinoflagelados, 3 cianófitas y 2 silicoflagelados) y 112 especies en Punta Cruces (62 diatomeas, 42 dinoflagelados, 5 cianófitas y 3 silicoflagelados), siendo el grado de disimilitud entre las comunidades del 41.55% (índice de disimilitud Bray-Curtis). No se detectaron diferencias significativas para la densidad entre ambas localidades (t16; 0.05 = 1.80; p =0.091), siendo Chaetaceros laevis la especie dominante en Cabo Marzo, y Ceratium fusus y C. furca las especies dominantes en Punta Cruces. Al evaluar el grado de correlación entre la comunidad fitoplanctónica y las condiciones abióticas evaluadas, se detectó que la salinidad fue la variable de mayor efecto en la zona de estudio (ρs = 0.41). Los resultados de esta investigación presentan una limitada aplicabilidad temporal y geográfica, sin embargo proporcionan información necesaria y novedosa sobre las características generales de la comunidad fitoplanctónica costera en uno de los sectores menos estudiados del Pacífico colombiano.
    Boletín Científico CIOH. 11/2010; 28:173-203.
  • Source

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
150 Downloads
Available from
May 30, 2014