How do trade and financial integration affect the relationship between growth and volatility?

International Monetary Fund, Research Department, Washington, DC 20431, United States
Journal of International Economics 03/2005; DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2005.05.009
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT The influential work of Ramey and Ramey [Ramey, G., Ramey, V.A., 1995. Cross-country evidence on the link between volatility and growth. American Economic Review 85, 1138–1151 (December).] highlighted an empirical relationship that has now come to be regarded as conventional wisdom—that output volatility and growth are negatively correlated. We reexamine this relationship in the context of globalization—a term typically used to describe the phenomenon of growing international trade and financial integration that has intensified since the mid-1980s. Using a comprehensive new data set, we document that, while the basic negative association between growth and volatility has been preserved during the 1990s, both trade and financial integration significantly weaken this negative relationship. Specifically, we find that, in a regression of growth on volatility and other controls, the estimated coefficient on the interaction between volatility and trade integration is significantly positive. We find a similar, although less robust, result for the interaction of financial integration with volatility.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper, using data from 21 advanced and 81 developing countries during 1971–2010, we empirically examine the impact of capital market openness on output volatility. We find that opening of capital markets increases the output volatility of developing countries. Furthermore, we find that the main channel through which capital market openness increases volatility is currency and external-debt crisis. Finally, we find that while Asian countries are less likely to experience a crisis, they become even more unstable than other developing countries once a crisis occurs. Our evidence strengthens the case for caution in developing countries' opening up of their capital markets.
    Pacific Economic Review 08/2013; 18(3). · 0.56 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper presents empirical evidence suggesting that the volatility, trend-growth, and shock-duration of terms-of-trade (TOT) are important drivers of the degree and composition of international financial integration (IFI). Our results are based on a panel of 55 primary-commodity exporting countries during 1980–2007. The findings reveal that TOT trend-growth has larger impact on IFI compared to TOT volatility. Also, higher TOT volatility is robustly associated with greater cross-holdings of foreign assets and lower cross-holdings of foreign liabilities. Another notable finding is that longer duration of TOT shocks seems to shift IFI towards equity assets.
    Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money 11/2014;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Macroeconomic instability is usually associated with increased short-term volatility in key fundamental variables. The recent literature that empirically examines implications of the macroeconomic volatility provides strong evidence of its negative growth effects. Stable macroeconomic environment represents a substantial fundamental pillar of a long-term economic growth. International financial integration as one of the phenomenon of last few decades still differentiate economists examining its direct and side effects on macroeconomic performance and volatility. In the paper we examine the relationship between international financial integration, volatility of financial flows and macroeconomic volatility. Examination of the international financial integration and its effects on macroeconomic volatility or stability is particularly important due to existence of generally expected positive relationship between macroeconomic volatility and economic growth, common trends of decreased macroeconomic instability worldwide and occurrence of negative sides of financial integration - financial crises. Following our results we suggest that relationship between financial integration, volatility of financial flows and macroeconomic volatility is positive, however not significant. Moreover the relationship is stronger in case of developing countries.
    Journal of Applied Economic Sciences ISSN 1843-6110. 09/2014; 9(3):433-457.

Full-text (4 Sources)

Available from
May 16, 2014