How Do Trade and Financial Integration Affect the Relationship Between Growth and Volatility?

International Monetary Fund, Research Department, Washington, DC 20431, United States
Journal of International Economics 03/2005; 05(1):176-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2005.05.009
Source: RePEc


The influential work of Ramey and Ramey [Ramey, G., Ramey, V.A., 1995. Cross-country evidence on the link between volatility and growth. American Economic Review 85, 1138–1151 (December).] highlighted an empirical relationship that has now come to be regarded as conventional wisdom—that output volatility and growth are negatively correlated. We reexamine this relationship in the context of globalization—a term typically used to describe the phenomenon of growing international trade and financial integration that has intensified since the mid-1980s. Using a comprehensive new data set, we document that, while the basic negative association between growth and volatility has been preserved during the 1990s, both trade and financial integration significantly weaken this negative relationship. Specifically, we find that, in a regression of growth on volatility and other controls, the estimated coefficient on the interaction between volatility and trade integration is significantly positive. We find a similar, although less robust, result for the interaction of financial integration with volatility.

Download full-text


Available from: Eswar S. Prasad, Dec 18, 2013
26 Reads
  • Source
    • "6 The advantage of specialization in sectors where a country has comparative advantages goes back to the classical Ricardo and Hecksher-Ohlin-Mundell trade models (see, e.g., Dornbusch et al., 1977). The trade-off between the productivity gains from specialization and the increased vulnerability to external shocks is established theoretically in Easterly et al. (2000), and verified empirically for emerging economies in Kose et al. (2006) "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: I study how the possibility of default on external debts affects other capital allocation decisions in a small open economy. In the model, default has an option value derived from the randomization over ex-post default regimes, which depends on country-specific productivity shocks. This feature of default reduces incentives for ex-ante diversification, which would reduce exposure to the productivity shock. As a result, if the economys debt to capital ratio is allowed to cross a fixed threshold (identified in the model), the unique equilibrium exhibits an allocation of capital that is less productive in expectation and more volatile than in a benchmark model without default. The model therefore captures a number of salient features of emerging and less developed countries, where low levels of international risk-sharing have gone hand-in-hand with frequent and recurring default events.
    Journal of Banking & Finance 07/2014; 49. DOI:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.06.008 · 1.29 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Therefore, under an imperfect financial market, the effectiveness of financial liberalisation in relaxing the liquidity constraints is an important determinant of consumption in China. Following Kose et al (2006), we incorporate the level of financial market development, measured by the ratio of total credit to the private sector to GDP ( CREP ), into the consumption function. "
    Dataset: j93592 3
  • Source
    • "Case studies are particularly useful in disentangling the complexity of the financial environment and economic history of each country. As Mendoza (1994) and Kose et al. (2006) argue, the lack of consensus regarding the relationship between finance and macroeconomic volatility is probably due to the structural differences between countries included in the cross-country analyses. Given that the nature of the shocks and policy regimes may also differ significantly across countries, failure to account for institutional differences may yield misleading conclusions regarding how finance is related to macroeconomic volatility (see Acemoglu et al., 2003). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The main objective of this paper is to explore the determinants of private consumption growth volatility in India, focusing on the role of financial sector policies. Using data for India over the period 1950-2005, the results show that the implementation of financial repressionist policies is strongly associated with lower consumption volatility. The results remain robust after controlling for a wide range of macroeconomic shocks and variables. The presence of a threshold effect implies that the benefits of financial reforms in reducing consumption volatility can only be reaped when the financial system becomes sufficiently liberalized. The results also indicate that the presence of a more open financial system may serve to dampen fluctuations in private consumption.
    Journal of International Money and Finance 10/2011; 30(6):947-964. DOI:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2011.05.010 · 1.02 Impact Factor
Show more