The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: A compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being.

The Oxford Happiness Project, School of Psychology, Oxford Brookes University, Headington Campus, Gipsy Lane, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK
Personality and Individual Differences (Impact Factor: 1.86). 11/2002; 33(7):1073-1082. DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00213-6

ABSTRACT An improved instrument, the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire (OHQ), has been derived from the Oxford Happiness Inventory, (OHI). The OHI comprises 29 items, each involving the selection of one of four options that are different for each item. The OHQ includes similar items to those of the OHI, each presented as a single statement which can be endorsed on a uniform six-point Likert scale. The revised instrument is compact, easy to administer and allows endorsements over an extended range. When tested against the OHI, the validity of the OHQ was satisfactory and the associations between the scales and a battery of personality variables known to be associated with well-being, were stronger for the OHQ than for the OHI. Although parallel factor analyses of OHI and the OHQ produced virtually identical statistical results, the solution for the OHQ could not be interpreted. The previously reported factorisability of the OHI may owe more to the way the items are formatted and presented, than to the nature of the items themselves. Sequential orthogonal factor analyses of the OHQ identified a single higher order factor, which suggests that the construct of well-being it measures is uni-dimensional. Discriminant analysis has been employed to produce a short-form version of the OHQ with eight items.

  • Source
    • "However, they unexpectedly found that intrinsic religiosity negatively correlated with happiness, whereas extrinsic social religiosity positively correlated with happiness. A limitation of their study was the use of Oxford Happiness Questionnaire (Hills & Argyle, 2002) which has been criticised as a valid measure of happiness (Kashdan, 2004; Lewis & Cruise, 2006). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Past research has found positive links between happiness and various aspects of religiousness, yet it remains unclear how religion contributes to happiness and other well-being outcomes. One possible route is through purpose in life. Among a sample of 208 Christian Polish university students we investigated the mediating role of purpose in life between religion and subjective well-being. Intrinsic religiosity, as expected, was related to higher levels of purpose in life, happiness and life satisfaction, and positively predicted happiness and life satisfaction through purpose in life. The findings support the notion that eudaimonia and eudaimonic constructs like purpose in life may be the links between religion and well-being outcomes.
    Mental Health Religion & Culture 10/2014; 17(8):827-831. DOI:10.1080/13674676.2014.928850
  • Source
    • "Measuring subjective wellbeing is done in single scale measurements aiming at global happiness evaluations like Cantril's ladder [12] as used by the Gallup World Poll (GWP). Others use multiple items like the Affect Balance Scale [13], the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire [14], the psychological WellBeing scale [15] and the Satisfaction with Life Scale [16]. Lyubomirsky & Lepper [17] argue that most scales measure either affective or cognitive aspects of wellbeing and they developed a scale to measure " ...subjective happiness – that is, a global, subjective assessment of whether one is a happy or an unhappy person... " . "
  • Source
    • "and contempt expressed (r ¼À.23, p < .001). Next, participants' happiness was assessed with the 29-item Oxford Happiness Inventory (Hills & Argyle, 2002). Items included, ''I feel that life is overflowing with rewards,'' and ''I am intensely interested in people.'' "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present study investigated whether the relationship between contempt and mental health outcomes differed by gender. Participants (N = 214) completed measures of happiness, general well-being, and contempt expression. The findings indicate a contrast in mental health outcomes associated with contempt expression for males and females. Specifically, males who expressed high levels of contempt reported higher levels of happiness and general well-being than males who expressed low levels of contempt; whereas, females who expressed high levels of contempt reported lower levels of happiness than females who expressed low levels of contempt. Implications for theory and future research are discussed.
    Communication Reports 03/2014; 27(1). DOI:10.1080/08934215.2013.835850
Show more


Available from