Article

Escaping the Red Queen Effect in Competitive Strategy:: Sense-testing Business Models

International University, Bremen and Harvard Business School; University of Stellenbosch; University of Stellenbosch; University of St. Gallen
European Management Journal 02/2005; DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.008
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT Most business models are based on traditional ways of strategy formulation and implementation, leading to incremental and not disruptive change in the nature of business and industry practices. The ‘red queen effect’ refers to the red queen’s advice in Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking Glass in which she says, in order to stay in a (competitive) place you have to run very hard, whereas to get anywhere you have to run even harder. In today’s knowledge and mobile environments we know that businesses cannot survive by just running harder, but rather by running differently and ‘smarter’ than competitors. The article suggests a sense-testing tool for managers to enable disruptive innovation of business models through corporate examples and case study evidence.

1 Bookmark
 · 
182 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Usage of software platforms alongside the business transformation potential of information and communication technology enables cooperation between different companies in both open and networked environments. This is possible when multiple actors cooperate in the delivery of services; each one contributes its own resources, and there is an underlying attractive business model for all of the players involved. This research paper investigates the definition process of a cooperative business model, which involves partners from different countries with different levels of technology, different markets, and different statutory regulations. The aim of this paper is to contribute to both theory and practice by introducing an approach for a cooperative business model definition that can be used in instances where there are conflicting requirements of partners who are willing to cooperate. In the case which is analyzed in this paper, the premature identification of the exploitation alternative scenarios among partners, the adoption of a perspective based on customers’ needs by the means of the business episode concept, and the usage of the business model ontology for the description of the structure of the cooperative business model, have helped the different partners to successfully converge to a common and agreed solution.
    International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies. 01/2012; 3(2):229-249.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The term “business model” has been misinterpreted and misused over the years, resulting in it being inadequately understood and applied by both practitioners and scholars. It is frequently confused with other popular terms in the management literature such as strategy, business concept, revenue model, economic model or even business process modeling. Our findings suggest that while business model describes what an organization currently is, it needs to be complemented with a strategy and capabilities in order to face upcoming changes. Besides clarifying the meaning and use of the business model terminology, we theorize about its roots through a combination of the resource-based view and transaction cost economics. Finally, we identify new avenues for further research such as the investigation of path dependency in a business model and the meaning of business model innovation. “The definition of a business model is murky at best. Most often, it seems to refer to a loose conception of how a company does business and generates revenue... The business model approach to management becomes an invitation for faulty thinking and self-delusion” (Porter, 2001, p. 73).“While the term ‘business model’ has gained widespread use in the practice community, the academic literature on this topic is fragmented and confounded by inconsistent definitions and construct boundaries” (George & Bock, 2011, p. 83).
    Long Range Planning 01/2013; · 2.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose – In the stream of works showing the semantic dimension as a core concept of the product innovation (e.g. design driven innovation), the paper aims to present a new business modeling approach driven by design and meanings. Similarly to the concept that the product is not represented only by form and function but also by meaning, the entire business model of a company does not transmit economic and technological value only, but tells a lot of the company from a semantic point of view. The work seeks to point out that companies can focus on the management of meanings to “make sense” of their entire business model moulded in building blocks, and realize what the authors called meaning strategy. Design/methodology/approach – After a detailed overview of the theoretical background grounded in the strategy literature and design one, to support the authors' perspective, an in-depth study of meaning strategy performed by illycaffè is presented. Findings – The value of the work lies in underlining that the design driven (product) innovation's application can be extended further than only describing successful (product) strategies of design-intensive manufactures and in the suggestions on how to implement a meaning strategy, creating new meanings not only in the products, but also in the building blocks of a company's business model. Originality/value – The meaning strategy content and action-oriented framework proposed and the matrix business model meanings versus building blocks can become tools to communicate the company strategy's pivotal elements and its evolution and they can drive strategists in developing and managing new/existing meanings and building blocks.
    Management Decision 04/2012; 50(4):718-743. · 1.30 Impact Factor

Full-text (4 Sources)

View
30 Downloads
Available from
Jun 4, 2014