Article

Greenhouse gas abatement strategies for animal husbandry

Wageningen University, Wageningen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (Impact Factor: 3.2). 02/2006; 112(2-3):163-170. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.015
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT Agriculture contributes significantly to the anthropogenic emissions of non-CO2 greenhouse gases methane and nitrous oxide. In this paper, a review is presented of the agriculture related sources of methane and nitrous oxide, and of the main strategies for mitigation. The rumen is the most important source of methane production, especially in cattle husbandry. Less, but still substantial, amounts of methane are produced from cattle manures. In pig and poultry husbandry, most methane originates from manures. The main sources of nitrous oxide are: nitrogen fertilisers, land applied animal manure, and urine deposited by grazing animals. Most effective mitigation strategies for methane comprise a source approach, i.e. changing animals’ diets towards greater efficiencies. Methane emissions, however, can also be effectively reduced by optimal use of the gas produced from manures, e.g. for energy production. Frequent and complete manure removal from animal housing, combined with on-farm biogas production is an example of an integrated on-farm solution. Reduced fertiliser nitrogen input, optimal fertiliser form, adding nitrification inhibitors, land drainage management, and reduced land compaction by restricted grazing are the best ways to mitigate nitrous oxide emissions from farm land, whereas, management of bedding material and solid manure reduce nitrous oxide emissions from housing and storage. Other than for methane, mitigation measures for nitrous oxide interact with other important environmental issues, like reduction of nitrate leaching and ammonia emission. Mitigation strategies for reduction of the greenhouse gases should also minimize pollution swapping.

4 Followers
 · 
143 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Climate change mitigation and adaptation have generally been considered in separate settings for both scientific and policy viewpoints. Recently, it has been stressed (e.g. by the latest IPCC reports) the importance to consider both mitigation and adaptation from land management together. To date, although there is already large amount of studies considering climate mitigation and adaptation in relation to grassland-based systems, there are no studies that analyse the potential synergies and tradeoffs for the main climate change mitigation and adaptation measures within the current European Policy context. This paper reviews which mitigation and adaptation measures interact with each other and how, and it explores the potential limitations and strengths of the different policy instruments that may have an effect in European grassland-based livestock systems.
    Grassland Science in Europe: EGF at 50: The future of European grasslands., Grassland Science in Europe: Volume 19 edited by Hopkins A., Collins R., Fraser M.D, King V.R, Lloyd D.C, Moorby J., Robson P.R.H, 09/2014: chapter Synergies between mitigation and adaptation to climate change in grassland-based farming systems.: pages 61-74; IBERS., ISBN: 978-0-9926930-1-2
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The forest ecosystem plays a pivotal role in contributing greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. In order to characterize the temporal pattern of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and identify the key factors affecting N2O emissions from a Masson pine forest in a hilly red-soil region in subtropical central China, we measured the N2O emissions in Jinjing of Hunan Province using the static chambergas chromatographic method for 3 years (2010–2012) and analyzed the relationships between the N2O fluxes and the environmental variables. Our results revealed that the N2O fluxes over the 3 years varied from −36.0 to 296.7 μg N m−2 h−1, averaging 18.4 ± 5.6 μg N m−2 h−1 (n = 3). The average annual N2O emissions were estimated to be 1.6 ± 0.3 kg N ha−1 year−1. The N2O fluxes exhibited clear intra-annual (seasonal) variations as they were higher in summers and lower in winters. Compared with other forest observations in the subtropics, N2O emissions at our site were relatively high, possibly due to the high local dry/wet N deposition, and were mostly sensitive to variations in precipitation and soil ammonium N content. In this work, a multiple linear regression model was developed to determine the influence of environmental factors on N2O emissions, in which a category predictor of “Season” was intentionally used to account for the seasonal variation of the N2O fluxes. Such a model explained almost 40% of the total variation in daily N2O emissions from the Masson pine forest soil studied (P < 0.001).
    Pedosphere 04/2015; 25(2). DOI:10.1016/S1002-0160(15)60011-X · 1.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Two of the most pressing sustainability issues are the depletion of fossil energy resources and the emission of atmospheric green house gases like carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. The aim of this study was to assess energy budgeting and carbon footprint in transgenic cotton–wheat cropping system through peanut intercropping with using 25–50 % substitution of recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) of cotton through farmyard manure (FYM) along with 100 % RDN through urea and control (0 N). To quantify the residual effects of previous crops and their fertility levels, a succeeding crop of wheat was grown with varying rates of nitrogen, viz. 0, 50, 100, and 150 kg ha−1. Cotton + peanut–wheat cropping system recorded 21 % higher system productivity which ultimately helped to maintain higher net energy return (22 %), energy use efficiency (12 %), human energy profitability (3 %), energy productivity (7 %), carbon outputs (20 %), carbon efficiency (17 %), and 11 % lower carbon footprint over sole cotton–wheat cropping system. Peanut addition in cotton–wheat system increased the share of renewable energy inputs from 18 to 21 %. With substitution of 25 % RDN of cotton through FYM, share of renewable energy resources increased in the range of 21 % which resulted into higher system productivity (4 %), net energy return (5 %), energy ratio (6 %), human energy profitability (74 %), energy productivity (6 %), energy profitability (5 %), and 5 % lower carbon footprint over no substitution. The highest carbon footprint (0.201) was recorded under control followed by 50 % substitution of RDN through FYM (0.189). With each successive increase in N dose up to 150 kg N ha−1 to wheat, energy productivity significantly reduced and share of renewable energy inputs decreased from 25 to 13 %. Application of 100 kg N ha−1 to wheat maintained the highest grain yield (3.71 t ha−1), net energy return (105,516 MJ ha−1), and human energy profitability (223.4) over other N doses applied to wheat. Application of 50 kg N ha−1 to wheat maintained the least carbon footprint (0.091) followed by 100 kg N ha−1 (0.100). Our study indicates that system productivity as well as energy and carbon use efficiencies of transgenic cotton–wheat production system can be enhanced by inclusion of peanut as an intercrop in cotton and substitution of 25 % RDN of cotton through FYM, as well as application of 100 kg N ha−1 to succeeding wheat crop.
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 04/2015; 187(282). DOI:10.1007/s10661-015-4516-4 · 1.68 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
35 Downloads
Available from
Jun 27, 2014