Goodness-of-fit tests for logistic regression models when data are collected using a complex sampling design

Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Statistics, School of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 320 West Tenth Ave., M200 Starling-Loving Hall, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Computational Statistics & Data Analysis (Impact Factor: 1.15). 05/2007; DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2006.07.006
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT Logistic regression models are frequently used in epidemiological studies for estimating associations that demographic, behavioral, and risk factor variables have on a dichotomous outcome, such as disease being present versus absent. After the coefficients in a logistic regression model have been estimated, goodness-of-fit of the resulting model should be examined, particularly if the purpose of the model is to estimate probabilities of event occurrences. While various goodness-of-fit tests have been proposed, the properties of these tests have been studied under the assumption that observations selected were independent and identically distributed. Increasingly, epidemiologists are using large-scale sample survey data when fitting logistic regression models, such as the National Health Interview Survey or the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Unfortunately, for such situations no goodness-of-fit testing procedures have been developed or implemented in available software. To address this problem, goodness-of-fit tests for logistic regression models when data are collected using complex sampling designs are proposed. Properties of the proposed tests were examined using extensive simulation studies and results were compared to traditional goodness-of-fit tests. A Stata ado function svylogitgof for estimating the F-adjusted mean residual test after svylogit fit is available at the author's website

Download full-text


Available from: Kellie Archer, May 19, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to explore the role of self-beliefs in predicting postschool outcomes for deaf young adults in transition from secondary settings. Three self-level constructs were explored: self-concept, self-determination, and expectations about the future. This study utilized data from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) that collected longitudinal data from youths with disabilities across the nation, 550 of which were deaf or hard of hearing and met the selection criteria in this study. This study examined the relationships between these deaf adolescents’ self-beliefs and actual future achievements that were reached as they transitioned to adult life, in three domains: life, employment, and education. Despite the generally positive self-beliefs of deaf individuals, which were, in some cases, related to postschool outcomes, the self-beliefs assessed in this study did not emerge as comprehensive predictors of postschool attainments. Findings suggest that for deaf individuals, successfully navigating transitions to adult life involves dimensions beyond individual agency. Positive self-beliefs are clearly a part of successfully attaining postschool outcomes, but deaf individuals may not have full access to equitable opportunities to capitalize on these beliefs.
    Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 06/2014; DOI:10.1007/s10882-014-9388-y · 0.89 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While many low and middle-income countries have implemented a package of priority health services (PHSP), there is little evidence regarding their consequences on equity. Taking the case of Chile, this study aims to analyse equity of utilisation and access to a recently implemented PHSP, the Explicit Health Guarantees Regime (GES). Drawing on Gilson's framework, we examined equity of utilisation using individual and ecological data. Access was addressed as a three-dimensional concept: availability, affordability and acceptability. The study also aimed analysing unintended consequences on services not included in the package. Our results suggest a pro-poor pattern of utilisation at an individual and ecological level. Wealthier beneficiaries have underutilised GES services and opted out the package. Disadvantaged groups have not been significantly empowered, as shown by their lack of information about the package and complaint mechanisms. We found inequities in male utilisation and age exclusions. We observed a significant strengthening of the public sector, expressed in increasing availability of financial resources. However, demand-side aspects have been neglected and uninsured and poorer populations are experiencing a greater burden of out-of-pocket expenses and significant information gaps, respectively. Vaccination coverage and TB control have shown signs of deterioration. Although our results indicate that it is possible to overcome the inverse care law, there is a need to expand the range of benefits of the GES package, introduce demand-side incentives and improve knowledge and complaint mechanisms among disadvantaged groups.
  • Source