Design of observer-based feedback control for time-delay systems with application to automotive powertrain control

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2350 Hayward Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Mathematics, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Journal of the Franklin Institute 01/2010; DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2009.09.001

ABSTRACT A new approach for observer-based feedback control of time-delay systems is developed. Time-delays in systems lead to characteristic equations of infinite dimension, making the systems difficult to control with classical control methods. In this paper, a recently developed approach, based on the Lambert W function, is used to address this difficulty by designing an observer-based state feedback controller via assignment of eigenvalues. The designed observer provides estimation of the state, which converges asymptotically to the actual state, and is then used for state feedback control. The feedback controller and the observer take simple linear forms and, thus, are easy to implement when compared to nonlinear methods. This new approach is applied, for illustration, to the control of a diesel engine to achieve improvement in fuel efficiency and reduction in emissions. The simulation results show excellent closed-loop performance.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper presents an algebraic approach to design the control law of a LTI observer used to stabilize a LTI plant with an output delay. Different than the existing work, we use the observer gains to influence the plant stability. This becomes possible simply by removing the delay terms from the observer part. Given the plant controller gains, our approach can find the parametric regions with respect to the observer controller gains so that gains selected from these regions make the combined plant-observer system asymptotically stable independent of the amount of delay in the plant. An example with simulations is provided to demonstrate the advantages of the proposed observer design.
    American Control Conference (ACC), 2011; 06/2011
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: SUMMARY This paper deals with the problem of designing a nonlinear observer for diesel engines. The goal is to estimate the masses entering the cylinders and the inlet and exhaust pressures. To achieve this, the considered model subject to disturbances contains linear parameter-varying part and nonlinear part having a large Lipschitz constant. The H ∞ criterion is used to reject the disturbances. Besides, the modified mean value theorem is applied to express the nonlinear error dynamics as a convex combination of known matrices with time-varying coefficients. The sufficient conditions are derived and given in terms of linear matrix inequality. The advantage of the proposed method is that it can be applied to a wider class of nonlinear systems, particulary our case: diesel engines. The proposed approach is tested and evaluated using an advanced diesel engine professional simulator AMEsim, (LMS International, Leuven, Belgium). Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 01/2014; · 1.22 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The estimation of the decay function (i.e., ; see equation (2)) for time delay systems has been a long-standing problem. Most existing methods focus on dominant decay rate (i.e., α) estimation, i.e., the estimation of the rightmost eigenvalue. Although some frequency domain approaches, such as bifurcation or finite dimensional approximation approaches are able to approximate the optimal decay rate computationally, the estimation of the factor, K, requires knowledge of the system trajectory over time and cannot be obtained from the frequency domain alone. The existing time domain approaches, such as matrix measure/norm or Lyapunov approaches, yield conservative estimates of decay rate. Furthermore, the factor K in the Lyapunov approaches is typically not optimized.
    Journal of Vibration and Control 09/2012; 18(10):1462-1473. · 4.36 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 22, 2014