Pressure induced dimerisation of C70

Materials Science Division, Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, Kalpakkam-603 102, India
Solid State Communications (Impact Factor: 1.9). 10/1997; 104(4):237-242. DOI: 10.1016/S0038-1098(97)00317-7


Solid C70 has been subjected simultaneously to high pressures and temperatures (HPHT), with pressures upto 7.5 GPa and temperatures upto 750°C. X-ray diffraction measurements on the recovered samples indicate that the initial h.c.p. solid C70 transforms to a rhombohedral structure which recovers to an f.c.c. structure on annealing. The associated changes in the intra molecular vibrational modes have been probed through infrared (IR) and Raman measurements. The IR measurements on these HPHT samples show splitting of some of the pristine modes and occurrence of several new modes. These sharp IR modes in the HPHT treated samples, which are seen to be different from that reported for photopolymerised C70, have been attributed to the formation of C70 dimers.

Download full-text


Available from: Bharathi Arunachalam, Mar 14, 2014
8 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For the first time investigations of structure and physical properties of C-70 after treatment at 4 less than or equal to P less than or equal to 12.5 GPa and 300 less than or equal to T less than or equal to 1770 K were carried out by X-ray, Raman and infrared spectroscopy. The results are plotted in a (P,T) diagram. The new superhard 3D-polymerized tetragonal phase has been found at P greater than or equal to 9.5 GPa. The superhard disordered state of samples produced from C-70 at 12.5 GPa with a hardness close to that of (100)-face diamond has also been found. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
    Physics Letters A 11/1998; 248(5-6):415-422. DOI:10.1016/S0375-9601(98)00630-6 · 1.68 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We shall discuss our recent high pressure Raman studies on single wall carbon nanotube (SWNT) bundles and compare them with pressure-induced amorphous and polymeric phases of crystalline C60 and C70. Our high pressure Raman studies on SWNT bundles carried out upto 25.9 GPa show that the intensities of both the radial modes (ω ≈ 170 cm—1) as well as tangential modes (around 1590 cm—1) decrease significantly with pressure, so much that the radial modes cannot be observed beyond 2.6 GPa. Most interestingly, the frequency of the dominant tangential mode increases upto 11 GPa, then decreases till 16 GPa and again increases. Raman spectra were resolved into four modes upto 10 GPa beyond which only one or two modes could be fitted to the recorded spectra. The pressure-softening of the mode between 11 and 16 GPa as well as other features of the Raman spectra are reversible in the decreasing pressure cycle. These results, though not understood at present, can be associated with the distortion of the circular cross-section of the tubes in the bundle, eventually leading to a possible transition of the SWNT bundle to graphite like carbon at 11 GPa which is completed at 16 GPa. This transition is reversible on decompression.
    physica status solidi (b) 09/1999; 215(1):393-401. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1521-3951(199909)215:1<393::AID-PSSB393>3.0.CO;2-8 · 1.49 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We report our high-pressure Raman studies on single-wall carbon nanotube bundles carried out up to 25.9 GPa. The intensity of the radial modes decreases more drastically as compared to that of the tangential modes. The former could be followed up in pressure runs to 3 GPa. The most intriguing observation is the anomalous pressure behaviour of the 1594 cm−1 tangential mode between 10 and 16 GPa. This feature, as well as the pressure dependence of intensity, peak position and linewidth, are reversible on decompression. The anomalous pressure dependence is argued to be associated with faceting of the tubes in the bundle, showing their remarkable resilience.
    Chemical Physics Letters 03/2000; 319(3-319):296-302. DOI:10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00123-8 · 1.90 Impact Factor
Show more