Connections between the cochlear nuclei in guinea pig

Department of Otolaryngology, Medical College of Ohio, Toledo, Ohio, USA
Hearing Research (Impact Factor: 2.85). 10/1992; 62(1):16-26. DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(92)90199-W
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study provides a detailed analysis of the appearances and distributions of neurons projecting from one cochlear nucleus to the other. Injections of wheatgerm agglutinin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase were made into ventral or dorsal cochlear nucleus of the guinea pig. Retrogradely labeled cells in the opposite cochlear nucleus were examined and quantified. Three major categories of labeled cells were discerned on the basis of their soma shape: elongate, round-to-oval, and polygonal. All injections resulted in widespread labeling of cells in all of these categories, but especially round-to-oval cells, in the opposite ventral cochlear nucleus and sparse labeling in the dorsal cochlear nucleus. The results suggest that there is a significant cochlear nucleus commissural projection involving heterogeneous cell types which could have diverse functions in binaural auditory signal processing.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A significant challenge in tinnitus research lies in explaining how acoustic insult leads to tinnitus in some individuals, but not others. One possibility is genetic variability in the expression and function of neuromodulators - components of neural signaling that alter the balance of excitation and inhibition in neural circuits. An example is nitric oxide (NO) - a free radical and potent neuromodulator in the mammalian brain - that regulates plasticity via both pre-synaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms. Changes in NO have previously been implicated in tinnitus generation, specifically in the ventral cochlear nucleus (VCN). Here, we examined nitric oxide synthase (NOS) - the enzyme responsible for NO production - in the guinea pig VCN following acoustic trauma. NOS was present in most cell types - including spherical and globular bushy cells, small, medium, and large multipolar cells, and octopus cells - spanning the entire extent of the VCN. The staining pattern was symmetrical in control animals. Unilateral acoustic over-exposure (AOE) resulted in marked asymmetries between ipsilateral and contralateral sides of the VCN in terms of the distribution of NOS across the cochlear nuclei in animals with behavioral evidence of tinnitus: fewer NOS-positive cells and a reduced level of NOS staining was present across the whole extent of the contralateral VCN, relative to the ipsilateral VCN. The asymmetric pattern of NOS-containing cells was observed as early as 1 day after AOE and was also present in some animals at 3, 7, and 21 days after AOE. However, it was not until 8 weeks after AOE, when tinnitus had developed, that asymmetries were significant overall, compared with control animals. Asymmetrical NOS expression was not correlated with shifts in the threshold hearing levels. Variability in NOS expression between animals may represent one underlying difference that can be linked to whether or not tinnitus develops after noise exposure.
    Frontiers in Neurology 01/2015; 6:53. DOI:10.3389/fneur.2015.00053
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Optogenetics has become an important research tool and is being considered as the basis for several neural prostheses. However, few studies have applied optogenetics to the auditory brainstem. This study explored whether optical activation of the cochlear nucleus (CN) elicited responses in neurons in higher centers of the auditory pathway, and it measured the evoked response to optical stimulation. Viral-mediated gene transfer was used to express channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) in the mouse CN. Blue light was delivered via an optical fiber placed near the surface of the infected CN and recordings were made in higher-level centers. Optical stimulation evoked excitatory multiunit spiking activity throughout the tonotopic axis of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (IC) and the auditory cortex (Actx). The pattern and magnitude of IC activity elicited by optical stimulation was comparable to that obtained with a 50dB SPL acoustic click. This broad pattern of activity was consistent with histological confirmation of green fluorescent protein (GFP) label of cell bodies and axons throughout the CN. Increasing pulse rates up to 320Hz did not significantly affect threshold or bandwidth of the IC responses, but rates higher than 50Hz resulted in desynchronized activity. Optical stimulation also evoked an auditory brainstem response, which had a simpler waveform than the response to acoustic stimulation. Control cases showed no responses to optical stimulation. These data suggest that optogenetic control of central auditory neurons is feasible, but opsins with faster channel kinetics may be necessary to convey information at rates typical of many auditory signals. Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    Brain Research 12/2014; 1599. DOI:10.1016/j.brainres.2014.11.044 · 2.83 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Die Ursache von Tinnitus, Schwindel und Hörstörungen kann in pathologischen Prozessen an der Halswirbelsäule (HWS) und im Kiefergelenk liegen. Bei Nachweis dieser Ursachen handelt es sich um einen somatosensorischen Tinnitus (SST). Für Afferenzen aus der HWS konnten entsprechende Projektionen der neuronalen Verschaltungen in den Nucleus cochlearis nachgewiesen werden. Es ist von einem reflexartigen Einfluss der HWS auf diesen Hörkern auszugehen. Das Tinnitus-Therapiekonzept der Berliner Charité beinhaltet eine tagesklinische Zusammenarbeit von HNO-Ärzten und vielen anderen Disziplinen. Es wurde ein standardisierter Untersuchungsablauf etabliert und eine physikalische Therapie in die interdisziplinäre Tinnitustherapie integriert. Zur tinnitusmodulierenden Therapie muskulärer Triggerpunkte eignen sich neben Lokalanästhetika auch die Selbstmassage oder die Behandlung durch einen Physiotherapeuten oder Osteopathen.
    HNO 01/2008; 56(7). DOI:10.1007/s00106-008-1721-2 · 0.54 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 20, 2014