Article

Testing panel data regression models with spatial error correlation

Department of Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4228, USA; Department of Statistics, Korea University, Sungbuk-Ku, Seoul, 136-701, South Korea; Center for DM&S, Korea Institute for Defense Analyses (KIDA), Cheong Ryang, P.O. Box 250, Seoul, 130-650, South Korea
Journal of Econometrics (Impact Factor: 1.71). 02/2003; DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00120-9
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT This paper derives several lagrange multiplier (LM) tests for the panel data regression model with spatial error correlation. These tests draw upon two strands of earlier work. The first is the LM tests for the spatial error correlation model discussed in Anselin (Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht; Rao's score test in spatial econometrics, J. Statist. Plann. Inference 97 (2001) 113) and Anselin et al. (Regional Sci. Urban Econom. 26 (1996) 77), and the second is the LM tests for the error component panel data model discussed in Breusch and Pagan (Rev. Econom. Stud. 47(1980) 239) and Baltagi et al. (J. Econometrics 54 (1992) 95). The idea is to allow for both spatial error correlation as well as random region effects in the panel data regression model and to test for their joint significance. Additionally, this paper derives conditional LM tests, which test for random regional effects given the presence of spatial error correlation. Also, spatial error correlation given the presence of random regional effects. These conditional LM tests are an alternative to the one-directional LM tests that test for random regional effects ignoring the presence of spatial error correlation or the one-directional LM tests for spatial error correlation ignoring the presence of random regional effects. We argue that these joint and conditional LM tests guard against possible misspecification. Extensive Monte Carlo experiments are conducted to study the performance of these LM tests as well as the corresponding likelihood ratio tests.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
161 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper considers a panel regression model with ill-posed data and proposes the generalized maximum entropy(GME) estimator of the unknown parameters. These are natural extensions from the biometries, statistics and econometrics literature. The performance of this estimator is investigated by using of Monte Carlo experiments. The results indicate that the GME method performs the best in estimating the unknown parameters.
    Korean Journal of Applied Statistics. 01/2006; 19(3).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: [1] Statistical models relating anthropogenic modifications of the watershed landscape to alterations in streamflow are often plagued by heterogeneity in background watershed conditions and coinciding trends in climate that can complicate the interpretation of clear statistical relationships. This study introduces the use of panel regression as a modeling approach that can better accommodate basin heterogeneity and identify more robust signals between anthropogenic impacts on the watershed landscape and hydrologic response. Panel regression techniques pool multidimensional data recorded across individuals (i.e., watersheds) and through time to better characterize within- and between-variability in the hydrologic data set. The separate attribution of variability to both time and space dimensions enables the method to better identify response characteristics that are generalizable across watersheds. This study introduces in detail two broad classes of panel regression models (the fixed effects and random effects models) that may be particularly useful in the context of identifying and quantifying the impact of human-induced landscape alterations on hydrologic response. The technique is presented in a case study relating watershed urbanization to changes in the annual runoff coefficient for 19 watersheds in the Northeast United States. Comparisons are made against more standard cross-sectional and time-based regression analyses. The results show that the estimated relationship between urbanization and the annual runoff coefficient in this region is highly dependent on the dimensions of data examined (space or time) and model structure selected, with the most sophisticated and appropriate model suggesting that no significant relationship can be detected.
    Water Resources Research. 12/2013; 49(12).
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper, we consider a panel data varying-coefficient partially linear model errors correlated in space and time. A serially correlated error structure is adopted for the correlation in time, and we propose an estimating procedure for the autoregressive coefficients in our set-up by combining a polynomial spline series approximation with least squares. The resulted estimators are shown to enjoy asymptotic properties. We construct a weighted semiparametric least squares estimator (WSLSE) and a weighted polynomial spline series estimator (WPSSE) for the parametric and nonparametric components of the mean model, respectively. The WSLSE is shown to be asymptotically normal and more efficient than the unweighted one, and the WPSSE is shown to achieve the optimal nonparametric convergence rate. Some simulation studies are reported to illustrate the finite sample performance of the proposed procedure. An application to Indonesian rice farming data is given.
    Statistica Sinica 01/2015; 35(1):275-294. · 1.44 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
908 Downloads
Available from
May 30, 2014