Reliability evaluation of multi-component cold-standby redundant system. Appl Math Comput

Graduate School of Engineering, Hiroshima University, Hirosima, Hiroshima, Japan
Applied Mathematics and Computation (Impact Factor: 1.55). 02/2006; 173(1):137-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2005.02.051
Source: DBLP


A new methodology for the reliability evaluation of an l-dissimilar-unit non-repairable cold-standby redundant system is introduced in this paper. Each unit is composed of a number of independent components with generalized Erlang distributions of lifetimes, arranged in any general configuration. We also extend the proposed model to the general types of non-constant hazard functions. To evaluate the system reliability, we construct a directed stochastic network with exponentially distributed arc lengths, in which each path of this network corresponds with a particular minimal cut of the reliability graph of system. Then, we present an analytical method to solve the resulting system of differential equations and to obtain the reliability function of the standby system. The time complexity of the proposed algorithm is O(2n), which is much less than the standard state-space method with the complexity of O(3n2). Finally, we generalize the proposed methodology, in which the failure mechanisms of the components are different.

Download full-text


Available from: Amir Azaron, Jan 15, 2014
  • Source
    • "In a word, there are a lot of references in which the components were assumed to follow exponential distributions, see Refs. [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] for details. Therefore, in this paper, GP model is used to describe the lifetime distributions and the repair time distributions of the main component. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper studies a cold standby repairable system with two different components and one repairman who can take multiple vacations. If there is a component which fails and the repairman is on vacation, the failed component will wait for repair until the repairman is available. In the system, assume that component 1 has priority in use. After repair, component 1 follows a geometric process repair, while component 2 can be repaired as good as new after failures. Under these assumptions, a replacement policy N based on the failed times of component 1 is studied. The system will be replaced if the failure times of component 1 reach N. The explicit expression of the expected cost rate is given, so that the optimal replacement time N⁎ is determined. Finally, a numerical example is given to illustrate the theoretical results of the model.
    Reliability Engineering [?] System Safety 07/2011; 96(7):868-875. DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2011.02.004 · 2.41 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The application of transform and wavelet coding to encode monochrome images is investigated. The proposed image coders are based on entropy-constrained trellis coded quantization. Excellent peak-signal-to-noise ratios were obtained for encoding the monochrome version of the 512×512 Lenna image. Comparisons with other results from the literature reveal that the proposed image coders are quite competitive. The subjective quality of the encoded images is also excellent
    Computers and Communications, 1993., Twelfth Annual International Phoenix Conference on; 04/1993
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper we present a method for transient analysis of availability and survivability of a system with the identical components and identical repairmen. The considered system is supposed to consist of series of k-out-of-n or parallel components. We employed the Markov models, eigen vectors and eigenvalues for analyzing the transient availability and survivability of the system. The method is implemented through an algorithm which is tested in MATLAB programming environment. The new method enjoys a stronger mathematical foundation and more flexibility for analyzing the transient availability and survivability of the system.
    Applied Mathematics and Computation 01/2007; 184(2):300-307. DOI:10.1016/j.amc.2006.05.177 · 1.55 Impact Factor
Show more