A Comparison of Acute and Chronic Toxicity Methods for Marine Sediments

US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Environmental Laboratory, CEERD-EP-R , 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199, United States
Marine environmental research (Impact Factor: 2.76). 09/2009; 68(3):118-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2009.04.010
Source: PubMed


Sediment toxicity tests are valuable tools for assessing the potential effects of contaminated sediments in dredged material evaluations because they inherently address complexity (e.g., unknown contaminants, mixtures, bioavailability). Although there is a need to understand the chronic and sublethal impacts of contaminants, it is common to conduct only short-term lethality tests in evaluations of marine sediments. Chronic toxicity methods for marine sediments have been developed but the efficacy of these methods is less documented. In this evaluation of marine sediments collected from the New York/New Jersey (NY/NJ) Harbor, three 10-d acute toxicity test methods (Ampelisca abdita, Leptocheirus plumulosus, Americamysis bahia) and three chronic and sublethal test methods (28-d L. plumulosus, 20- and 28-d Neanthes arenaceodentata) were applied by three testing laboratories. Although the N. arenaceodentata and A. bahia tests did not indicate significant toxicity for the sediments tested in this study, these methods have been reported useful in evaluating other sediments. The 10-d A. abdita, 10-d L. plumulosus and 28-d L. plumulosus tests were comparable between laboratories, indicating 29–43%, 29%, and 43–71% of the tested sediments as potentially toxic. The 28-d L. plumulosus method was the only chronic toxicity test that responded to the test sediments in this study. The 28-d L. plumulosus endpoint magnitudes were related to sediment chemistry and the sublethal endpoints were reduced as much or more than acute lethality endpoints. However, intra-treatment sublethal endpoint variability was greater, compromising detection of statistical significance. In this study, the chronic L. plumulosus test method was less consistent among laboratories relative to acute test methods, identifying potential for toxicity in a similar number (or slightly more) NY/NJ Harbor sediments.

Download full-text


Available from: Alan J Kennedy,
  • Source
    • "Sediments are often a repository for many environmental contaminants (Chariton et al. 2010; Dafforn et al. 2012) and may contain different contaminants from different sources. The potential toxicity of contaminated sediments is frequently tested using amphipods because of their sensitivity to contaminants and ease of use in sub-lethal whole-sediment bioassays (Scarlett et al. 2007; Kennedy et al. 2009; Mann et al. 2009; Simpson and Spadaro 2011). Although procedures for both lethal and sub-lethal chronic toxicity testing have been developed with these species, like other standardized tests, the cause of toxicity is difficult to identify. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The epibenthic amphipod Melita plumulosa shows unique gene expression profiles when exposed to different contaminants. We hypothesized that specific changes in transcript abundance could be used in a battery of quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays as a toxicity identification evaluation (TIE)-like approach to identify the most relevant stressor in field-contaminated sediments. To test this hypothesis, seven candidate transcriptomic markers were selected, and their specificity following metal exposure was confirmed. The performance of these markers across different levels of added metals was verified. The ability of these transcripts to act as markers was tested by exposing amphipods to metal-contaminated field-collected sediments and measuring changes in transcript abundance via qPCR. For two of the three sediments tested, at least some of the transcriptomic patterns matched our predictions, suggesting that they would be effective in helping to identify metal exposure in field sediments. However, following exposure to the third sediment, transcriptomic patterns were unlike our predictions. These results suggest that the seven transcripts may be insufficient to discern individual contaminants from complex mixtures and that microarray or RNA-Seq global gene expression profiles may be more effective for TIE. Changes in transcriptomics based on laboratory exposures to single compounds should be carefully validated before the results are used to analyze mixtures.
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research 07/2014; DOI:10.1007/s11356-014-3234-8 · 2.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Traditional ecotoxicity tests are designed to be rapidly and inexpensively conducted, to be easily replicated, and to have obvious ecological significance (Fisher and Hook 2002). These tests may typically involve an examination of acute toxicity, or more chronic effects on growth and reproduction (Kennedy et al. 2009; Simpson and Spadaro 2011). They are often designed for short‐lived, fast‐growing species and are typically conducted over a few days for acute tests, with many chronic tests lasting 10 to 28 days. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ensuring the health of aquatic ecosystems and identifying species at risk from the detrimental effects of environmental contaminants can be facilitated by integrating analytical chemical analysis with carefully selected biological endpoints measured in tissues of species of concern. These biological endpoints include molecular, biochemical and physiological markers (i.e. biomarkers) that when integrated, can clarify issues of contaminant bioavailability, bioaccumulation and ecological effects while enabling a better understanding of the effects of non-chemical stressors. In the case of contaminant stressors, an understanding of chemical modes of toxicity can be incorporated with diagnostic markers of aquatic animal physiology to help understand the health status of aquatic organisms in the field. Furthermore, new approaches in functional genomics and bioinformatics can help discriminate individual chemicals, or groups of chemicals among complex mixtures that may contribute to adverse biological effects. While the use of biomarkers is not a new paradigm, such approaches have been underutilized in the context of ecological risk assessment and natural resource damage assessment. From a regulatory standpoint, these approaches can help better assess the complex effects from coastal development activities to assessing ecosystem integrity pre- and post-development or site remediation. Integr Environ Assess Manag © 2014 SETAC.
    Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 07/2014; 10(3). DOI:10.1002/ieam.1530 · 1.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This review covers selected 2009 peer reviewed journal articles on the biological, chemical and physical effects of natural and anthropogenic pollutants on marine and estuarine plants and animals. The review covers field and laboratory measurement activities (concentrations of contaminants, field surveys, toxicity testing and biomarkers). Papers focus further on pollution issues of current interest including endocrine disrupters, wastewater discharges, dredging and disposal, etc. Special emphasis was placed on oil spills due to the major ongoing Deepwater Horizon blowout in the Gulf of Mexico. Several topical areas reviewed in the past were dropped this year due to circumstances beyond our control (including work on the Deepwater Horizon incident). There is considerable overlap across subject areas (e.g. some bioaccumulation papers may be cited in other topical categories). As always, readers should only use this as a guide and must consult the original papers before citing them, including double-checking units.
    Water Environment Research 10/2010; 82(10):2001. DOI:10.2175/106143010X12756668802175 · 0.87 Impact Factor
Show more