Article

A SWOT analysis of environmental management practices in Greek Mining and Mineral Industry

Department of Environment, University of the Aegean, 81100 Mytilini, Greece
Resources Policy (Impact Factor: 2.14). 09/2010; 35(3):226-234. DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2010.02.002

ABSTRACT Over the last two decades, mining and mineral exploration companies have adopted various environmental management practices in response to society’s pressure for better environmental protection. The literature highlights a number of benefits and challenges for companies adopting environmental management practices with the Greek Mining and Mineral Industry (GMMI) facing similar issues. In order to analyze the challenges faced by the GMMI, a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) analysis was conducted, which examined the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats faced by the industry when adopting environmental management practices. The analysis prescribes policy recommendations both for the government and industry which, if adopted, could facilitate improved environmental performance.

2 Bookmarks
 · 
459 Views
  • Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 10/2012; 58:1544-1554. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1141
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper applies a 'comprehensive' strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis to compare the 'before and after' scenarios of integrating a safe water supply (SWS) into a sustainable sanitation system (SSS) in the peri-urban Ger areas of Ulaanbaatar. Qualitative field investigations, including interviews and focus group discussions, are conducted with stakeholders and key informants to collect data on the scenarios before the SSS and to develop a conceptual framework after the SSS implementation. The before-implementation scenario has one strength, that is, the interest of communities and NGOs toward the SWS-SSS integration, which facilitates the acceptance and up-scaling of sustainable technologies. The after-implementation scenario shows additional strengths, such as community acceptance and satisfaction with SSS. The identified weaknesses are attributed to the lack of community-based organizations, community participation, and inter-sector coordination. The marketing of SSS, the involvement of banks and micro-credit systems, and the reuse of treated greywater have been identified as opportunities. The before-implementation scenario identifies the use of pit latrines and the lack of political will as the primary threats, whereas the after-implementation scenario identifies technology innovations for the extreme cold as a primary threat. The application of the SWS-SSS integration in other cases must be investigated further.
    Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development 09/2014; 4(3):437. DOI:10.2166/washdev.2013.240 · 0.51 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent years have witnessed a significant amount of construction waste as a result of rapid urbanization and large scale of construction activities in China. However, compared to many advanced western countries, very few studies have been carried out for investigating the construction waste management problems in China. This study, by conducting a strength, weakness, opportunity, and threat (SWOT) analysis, aims to help understand the status quo of construction waste management based on the particular context of Shenzhen city in south China. Data supporting the analysis are derived from multiple channels including governmental reports, waste management related regulations, literature review, and focus group meetings. The study opens a window through which major stakeholders involved can perceive the internal and external conditions of construction waste management in Shenzhen. The seven critical strategies, which are presented based on the SWOTs identified, could be useful for Shenzhen to develop and promote its future construction waste management at the strategic level.
    Journal of Cleaner Production 01/2013; 39:1-8. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.016 · 3.59 Impact Factor