On bootstrapping L2-type statistics in density testing

Sonderforschungsbereich 373, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Spandauer Straße 1, D-10178 Berlin, Germany
Statistics [?] Probability Letters (Impact Factor: 0.53). 11/2000; 50(2):137-147. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-7152(00)00091-2

ABSTRACT We consider non-parametric tests for checking parametric hypotheses about the stationary density of weakly dependent observations. The test statistic is based on the L2-distance between a non-parametric and a smoothed version of a parametric estimate of the stationary density. Since this statistic behaves asymptotically as in the case of independent observations an i.i.d.-type bootstrap to determine the critical value for the test is proposed.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper, we study the problem of testing the hypothesis on whether the density f of a random variable on a sphere belongs to a given parametric class of densities. We propose two test statistics based on the L2 and L1 distances between a non-parametric density estimator adapted to circular data and a smoothed version of the specified density. The asymptotic distribution of the L2 test statistic is provided under the null hypothesis and contiguous alternatives. We also consider a bootstrap method to approximate the distribution of both test statistics. Through a simulation study, we explore the moderate sample performance of the proposed tests under the null hypothesis and under different alternatives. Finally, the procedure is illustrated by analysing a real data set based on wind direction measurements.
    Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 03/2014; 41(1). DOI:10.1111/sjos.12020 · 1.06 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Degenerate UU- and VV-statistics play an important role in the field of hypothesis testing since numerous test statistics can be formulated in terms of these quantities. Therefore, consistent bootstrap methods for UU- and VV-statistics can be applied in order to determine critical values for these tests. We prove a new asymptotic result for degenerate UU- and VV-statistics of weakly dependent random variables. As our main contribution, we propose a new model-free bootstrap method for UU- and VV-statistics of dependent random variables. Our method is a modification of the dependent wild bootstrap recently proposed by Shao [X. Shao, The dependent wild bootstrap, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 105 (2010) 218–235], where we do not directly bootstrap the underlying random variables but the summands of the UU- and VV-statistics. Asymptotic theory for the original and bootstrap statistics is derived under simple and easily verifiable conditions. We discuss applications to a Cramér–von Mises-type test and a two sample test for the marginal distribution of a time series in detail. The finite sample behavior of the Cramér–von Mises test is explored in a small simulation study. While the empirical size was reasonably close to the nominal one, we obtained nontrivial empirical power in all cases considered.
    Journal of Multivariate Analysis 05/2013; 117:257–280. DOI:10.1016/j.jmva.2013.03.003 · 0.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This survey intends to collect the developments on Goodness-of-Fit for regression models during the last 20 years, from the very first origins with the proposals based on the idea of the tests for density and distribution, until the most recent advances for complex data and models. Far from being exhaustive, the contents in this paper are focused on two main classes of tests statistics: smoothing-based tests (kernel-based) and tests based on empirical regression processes, although other tests based on Maximum Likelihood ideas will be also considered. Starting from the simplest case of testing a parametric family for the regression curves, the contributions in this field provide also testing procedures in semiparametric, nonparametric, and functional models, dealing also with more complex settings, as those ones involving dependent or incomplete data.
    Test 09/2013; 22(3). DOI:10.1007/s11749-013-0327-5 · 1.02 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jul 8, 2014