Hydrocarbon fuels produced by catalytic pyrolysis of hospital plastic wastes in a fluidizing cracking process

Department of Dentistry, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei 106, Taiwan
Fuel Processing Technology (Impact Factor: 3.02). 11/2010; 91(11):1355-1363. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.03.016

ABSTRACT A mixture of post-consumer polyethylene/polypropylene/polystyrene (PE/PP/PS) with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) waste was pyrolyzed over cracking catalysts using a fluidizing reaction system operating isothermally at ambient pressure. The influences of catalyst types and reaction conditions including reaction temperatures, ratios of catalyst to plastic feed, flow rates of fluidizing gas and catalyst particle sizes were examined. Experiments carried out with various catalysts gave good yields of valuable hydrocarbons with differing selectivity in the final products dependent on reaction conditions. A model based on kinetic and mechanistic considerations associated with chemical reactions and catalyst deactivation in the acid-catalyzed degradation of plastics has been developed. The model gives a good representation of experimental results from the degradation of commingled plastic waste. The results of this study are useful for determining the effects of catalyst types and reaction conditions on both the product distribution and selectivity from hospital plastic waste, and especially for the utilization of post-use commercial FCC catalysts for producing valuable hydrocarbons in a fluidizing cracking process.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pyrolysis of polypropylene (PP) and high density polyethylene (HDPE) into fuel like products was investigated over temperature range of 250 to 400 °C. The product yields as a function of temperature were studied. Total conversion as high as 98.66 % (liquid; 69.82%, gas; 28.84%, and residue; 1.34 %) was achieved at 300 °C in case of PP and 98.12 % (liquid; 80.88 %, gas; 17.24 %, and residue; 1.88 %) in case of HDPE at 350 °C. The liquid fractions were analyzed by FTIR and GC-MS. The results showed that the liquid fractions consisted of a wide range of hydrocarbons mainly distributed within the C6–C16. The liquid product obtained in case of PP is enriched in the naphtha range hydrocarbons. Similarly, the liquid product obtained in case of HDPE is also enriched in naphtha range hydrocarbons with preponderance in gasoline and diesel range hydrocarbons. The % distribution of paraffinic, olefinic, and naphthenic hydrocarbons in liquid product derived from PP is 66.55, 25.7, and 7.58 %, respectively, whereas in case HDPE, the % distribution is 59.70, 31.90, and 8.40 %, respectively. Upon comparing the hydrocarbon group type yields, PP gave high yield of paraffinic hydrocarbons while HDPE gave high yields of olefins and naphthenes. The whole liquid fractions and their corresponding distillates fractions were also analyzed for fuel properties. The results indicated that the derived liquid fractions were fuel-like meeting the fuel grade criteria.
    International Journal of Green Energy 03/2014; 12(7):140303064405005. DOI:10.1080/15435075.2014.880146 · 1.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Principal component analysis is used as a pattern recognition method to find criteria for grouping into lumps the compounds formed in the thermal and catalytic pyrolysis of waste tyres. This information is the stating point for the proposal of simple kinetic schemes that efficiently describe the complex reactions that occur in the pyrolysis process. It has been proven that the kinetic scheme must consider a depolymerization step of the waste to give isoprene and styrene monomers and the dimer of the former (limonene), the formation of primary products (char, tar and gas) by thermal cracking of the original high molecular weight compounds, and the subsequent secondary reactions by thermal cracking of heavy primary fractions (tar) to form lighter fractions (gas, gasoline and C10− aromatics). The use of a catalyst prepared based on a HY zeolite selectively enhances the reactions of condensation and alkylation of limonene and gasoline to aromatics, whereas the one based on a HZSM-5 zeolite selectively enhances the cracking of tar to lighter fractions (gas and C10− aromatics), limonene cracking to isoprene and C5–C10 hydrocarbons or even the cracking of the latter to C1–C4 gases.
    Chemical Engineering Journal 10/2014; 106:9–17. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2014.05.131 · 4.06 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Factorial Design Methodology (FDM) was developed to enhance diesel fuel fraction (C9–C23) from waste high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and Heavy Gas Oil (HGO) through co-pyrolysis. FDM was used for optimization of the following reaction parameters: temperature, catalyst and HDPE amounts. The HGO amount was constant (2.00 g) in all experiments. The model optimum conditions were determined to be temperature of 550 °C, HDPE = 0.20 g and no FCC catalyst. Under such conditions, 94% of pyrolytic oil was recovered, of which diesel fuel fraction was 93% (87% diesel fuel fraction yield), no residue was produced and 6% of noncondensable gaseous/volatile fraction was obtained. Seeking to reduce the cost due to high process temperatures, the impact of using higher catalyst content (25%) with a lower temperature (500 °C) was investigated. Under these conditions, 88% of pyrolytic oil was recovered (diesel fuel fraction yield was also 87%) as well as 12% of the noncondensable gaseous/volatile fraction. No waste was produced in these conditions, being an environmentally friendly approach for recycling the waste plastic.
    Waste Management 12/2014; 36. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.11.023 · 3.16 Impact Factor