Twenty-five year follow-up of child-reading practices: Reliability of retrospective data

Department of Psychology, Indiana University Southeast, New Albany, IN 47150, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, U.S.A.
Personality and Individual Differences (Impact Factor: 1.86). 08/1993; DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(93)90021-T

ABSTRACT A follow-up of participants in a study of speech development provided the opportunity to investigate (i) the reliability of retrospective accounts of the child-rearing environment, and (ii) personality bias in retrospective recall of child-rearing circumstances. Comparing original accounts of child-rearing to retrospective accounts is the most powerful design for examining the reliability of retrospective recall, yet it has been employed by only one other study. As part of the original study, parents completed a child-rearing questionnaire when their children were age 7, and the children completed the Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI) at age 16. Factor analysis of the child-rearing questionnaire identified four factors, Cohesiveness, Openness, Control and Punishment, for which scales were constructed. At follow-up, 147 parents and 119 children completed a retrospective child-rearing questionnaire as well as the EPI. The data showed that retrospective accounts were only moderately reliable but did not appear to be affected by personality bias.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Childhood abuse and neglect may increase the risk for later antisocial and criminal behavior, especially violent behavior. The objective of this study was retrospectively to compare childhood abuse and neglect experiences in the groups of Violent and Property offenders. The sample consisted of 34 recidivist inmates with the mean age of 26.9 years. The findings showed that physical, psychological, and sexual abuse and neglect was experienced by 82%, 97%, 3% and 94% of the offenders, respectively. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of abuse or neglect between the Violent and Property offenders. Neither were the groups differentiated by any combination of the abuse and neglectċvariables. Some differences emerged in the types of physical abuse between the offender groups. The Violent offenders tended to have been subjected to more severe, frequent and versatile abuse and neglect than the Property offenders, although not significantly so. The Homicidal offenders had, however, experienced significantly more severe, frequent, and versatile physical abuse than the Property offenders. The limitations of the study lie in the small sample size and the retrospective nature of the data collection.
    Psychology Crime and Law 01/1996; Crime and Law(Vol. 3):1-13. · 0.69 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The relationship between an abusive environment within the family and proneness to shame, guilt, anger, and hostility in college students revealed that greater exposure to emotional abusiveness was significantly related to higher shame, overt and covert hostility, and expressed and unexpressed anger. Greater exposure to physical abusiveness was significantly related to overt hostility and a tendency to experience anger without a specific provoking situation. Women reported higher shame and guilt, whereas men reported higher levels of overt hostility and expressed anger. Shame proneness was related to covert hostility and unexpressed anger for both men and women. However, guilt proneness was not related to exposure to family abusiveness or, with one exception, to the anger and hostility variables. Implications for therapy with adult survivors of child abuse are discussed.
    Journal of Family Violence 05/1995; 10(2):141-157. · 1.17 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Over the years since the inception of clinical psychology, the role of the clinical psychologist has evolved tremendously. Clinical psychology has grown from a profession that in many aspects was founded within a medical model of treatment, and de facto, relegated to a subservient role in the treatment of persons with mental health disorders. Over the decades, since the formal beginnings of clinical psychology, the role of the clinical psychologist has gained in credibility, scope, and autonomy of practice. In recent decades, the role of clinical psychology in relation to pharmacological treatments has grown – albeit with much debate and little clarity as to what role clinical psychologists should play in the pharmacological treatment of persons with mental health disorders (Gutierrez & Silk, 1998). This chapter presents a model for clinical psychologists with phasmacological training in the supervision of mental health practitioners with phasmacological training.