Article
An unbiased, staged, multicentre, validation strategy for Alzheimer's disease CSF tau levels
Exp Neurol
223:432-8.
DOI:S0014-4886(09)00468-3 [pii]
10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.11.010
ISBN: 1090-2430 (Electronic)
0014-4886 (Linking) pp.432-8
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (1)
-
Article: A New Decision Tree Combining Abeta 1-42 and p-Tau Levels in Alzheimer's Diagnosis.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The objective of this work was to improve the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) by proposing a simple decision tree based on three major biomarkers of AD found in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF): amyloid peptide Aβ1-42, total Tau (t-Tau) and Tau phosphorylated at Thr181 (p-Tau). Two consecutive cohorts comprising 548 patients in total were recruited by the Memory and Neurology Clinics at Lille University Hospital (France). These included 293 patients with AD, 171 patients with other dementias and 84 healthy controls. All patients underwent lumbar puncture for the assessment of CSF concentrations of Aβ1-42, t-Tau and p-Tau. International criteria for dementias were used for diagnosis by investigators blind to CSF test results. To identify the combination of biomarkers that best predicted the 3 diagnoses, we used the CHAID decision tree method with the first cohort. Our analysis yielded a two-step decision tree, with a first stratification step based on the Aβ1-42/p-Tau ratio of the CSF, and a second step based on CSF p-Tau concentrations. The second cohort was then used to determine the power (0.618), sensitivity (82%) and specificity (81%) of this tree in AD diagnosis. These were found to be at least as high as those of other known algorithms based on the three CSF biomarkers, Aβ1-42, t-Tau and p-Tau. For the first time, diagnostic rules for AD based on CSF variables were compared in a single study. Our findings indicate that the measurement of Aβ1-42 and p-Tau levels in the CSF is sufficient to diagnose AD.Current Alzheimer research 09/2012; · 4.97 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease
audit CSF tau cutoff values
cerebrospinal fluid
core supportive criterion
CSF tau levels
cutoff level
cutoff values
diagnostic criteria
large dataset
large range
local CSF hTau cutoff levels
pilot dataset
population-based cutoff values
published inter-laboratory coefficient
receiver operator characteristics
ROC optimised cutoff level
two-stage multicentre strategy