Article

Seasonal variation in carbon dioxide exchange over a Mediterranean annual grassland in California

Ecosystem Science Division, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, 151 Hilgard Hall, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology (Impact Factor: 3.89). 05/2004; DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.10.004

ABSTRACT Understanding how environmental variables affect the processes that regulate the carbon flux over grassland is critical for large-scale modeling research, since grasslands comprise almost one-third of the earth’s natural vegetation. To address this issue, fluxes of CO2 (Fc, flux toward the surface is negative) were measured over a Mediterranean, annual grassland in California, USA for 2 years with the eddy covariance method.To interpret the biotic and abiotic factors that modulate Fc over the course of a year we decomposed net ecosystem CO2 exchange into its constituent components, ecosystem respiration (Reco) and gross primary production (GPP). Daytime Reco was extrapolated from the relationship between temperature and nighttime Fc under high turbulent conditions. Then, GPP was estimated by subtracting daytime values of Fc from daytime estimates of Reco.Results show that most of carbon exchange, both photosynthesis and respiration, was limited to the wet season (typically from October to mid-May). Seasonal variations in GPP followed closely to changes in leaf area index, which in turn was governed by soil moisture, available sunlight and the timing of the last frost. In general, Reco was an exponential function of soil temperature, but with season-dependent values of Q10. The temperature-dependent respiration model failed immediately after rain events, when large pulses of Reco were observed. Respiration pulses were especially notable during the dry season when the grass was dead and were the consequence of quickly stimulated microbial activity.Integrated values of GPP, Reco, and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) were 867, 735, and −132 g C m−2, respectively, for the 2000–2001 season, and 729, 758, and 29 g C m−2 for the 2001–2002 season. Thus, the grassland was a moderate carbon sink during the first season and a weak carbon source during the second season. In contrast to a well-accepted view that annual production of grass is linearly correlated to precipitation, the large difference in GPP between the two seasons were not caused by the annual precipitation. Instead, a shorter growing season, due to late start of the rainy season, was mainly responsible for the lower GPP in the second season. Furthermore, relatively higher Reco during the non-growing season occurred after a late spring rain. Thus, for this Mediterranean grassland, the timing of rain events had more impact than the total amount of precipitation on ecosystem GPP and NEE. This is because its growing season is in the cool and wet season when carbon uptake and respiration are usually limited by low temperature and sometimes frost, not by soil moisture.

1 Bookmark
 · 
197 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We quantified the spatial-temporal roles of photosynthesis, temperature and soil moisture on soil respiration of an oak savanna with a combination of field and laboratory measurements. Canopy photosynthesis was quantified from eddy covariance measurements over and under the woodland. Spatial gradients in soil respiration were surveyed with a portable soil respiration chamber. Contributions to soil respiration by autotrophs and heterotrophs were assessed using profiles of CO 2 sensors inserted in the soil under a tree and in the open grassland. At a given spot, soil respiration was a function of soil moisture and temperature and labile carbon pools associated with decomposing organic matter and recent photosynthetic production. Spatial/temporal variations in soil respiration reflect changes in these controlling factors. Spatial transect studies, for example, showed that soil respiration decreased by 60% as one radiates from a tree to the open grassland. Soil respiration measured under a tree crown reflected the sum of rhizosphere respiration and heterotrophic respiration while soil respiration measured in an open area represented heterotrophic respiration when the grass was dead during the summer. Basal rates of soil respiration diminished over the summer as the soil dried and it stressed photosynthetic and microbial activity. Summer rains, on the other hand, were found to stimulate the activity of latent microbes immediately, thereby pulsing soil respiration by more than a factor of 10 until the upper soil layer dries. Continuous measurements of soil respiration revealed that soil respiration under the tree was decoupled with soil temperature. Soil respiration was strongly correlated with tree photosynthesis, but with a time lag of 7 to 12 hours. These results indicate that photosynthesis drives soil respiration in addition to soil temperature and moisture. Measurements of soil respiration were combined with remote sensing information to upscale soil CO 2 efflux measurements. Cumulative soil respiration was 394 gC m -2 y -1 in the open area and 616 gC m -2 y -1 under trees producing a site-average of 488 gC m -2 y -1 .
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background/Question/Methods Dryland (semiarid and arid) ecosystems are important to the global carbon (C) budget as they cover over 40% of the Earth’s land surface. The C cycling in desert ecosystems is particularly sensitive to climate and land-use changes, and may feed back to the climate system. Currently, the C dynamics of desert shrub ecosystems is less-well-understood compared to those of forests and grasslands. In order to predict global C cycling under changing climate, it is needed to examine the relative importance of multiple abiotic stresses (e.g., drought, heat and excessive solar radiation) and biotic factors (e.g., leaf area index) in controlling C exchange over dryland ecosystems. Extensive rehabilitation practices have been carried out in desertified areas around the world, but information on the C sequestration potential of recovering vegetation is still largely lacking. Using the eddy-covariance technique, we measured the net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE) over a recovering shrub ecosystem in northwest China throughout 2012. We also made year-round measurements of climatic and biotic factors. The questions asked were (1) how the magnitudes of NEE and its components vary seasonally and diurnally, (2) how biophysical factors determine CO2 fluxes at multiple timescales. Results/Conclusions The annual budget showed a gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) of 456 ± 8 g C m-2 yr-1 and an ecosystem respiration (Re) of 379 ± 3 g C m-2 yr-1, resulting in a net C sink of -77 ± 7 g C m-2 yr-1. Both the maximum C assimilation rate (i.e., at optimum light intensity) and the quantum yield varied strongly over the growing season, being higher in summer, and lower in spring and autumn. At the half-hour scale, water stress exerted a major control over NEE, and interacted with heat stress and photoinhibition in constraining C fixation. Low soil moisture also reduced the temperature sensitivity of Re (Q10). At the synoptic scale, rain events triggered immediate pulses of C release from the ecosystem, followed by peaks of CO2 uptake 1-2 days later. Over the entire growing season, leaf area index accounted for 45 and 65% of the seasonal variation in NEE and GEP, respectively. There was a linear dependence of daily Re on GEP, with a slope of 0.34. These results highlight the role of abiotic stresses and their alleviation in regulating C cycling in the face of an increasing frequency and intensity of extreme climatic events.
    99th ESA Annual Convention 2014; 08/2014
  • Source
    Zhikun Zhu, Yaoming Ma, Maoshan Li, Zeyong Hu, Chao Xu, Lang Zhang, Cunbo Han, Yongjie Wang, Tamagawa Ichiro
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The net ecosystem carbon dioxide (CO2) exchange (NEE) between the atmosphere and an alpine steppe ecosystem was measured by the Eddy covariance (EC) method on the Nam Co area of the Tibetan Plateau during the growing season in 2008 and 2009. The diurnal amplitude of NEE varied substantially during the growing seasons. The maximum CO2 uptake rates were 3.74 and 3.44 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1 in August 2008 and 2009, respectively. The peak daily CO2 uptake was observed on 16 July (DOY 198, 1.19 g C m−2 day−1) 2008, which occurred one month earlier than that in 2009 (DOY 228, 1.12 g C m−2day−1). This indicated that the alpine steppe had lower carbon sequestration potential comparing with other grasslands. The daily NEE responded to AGB in a linear manner (NEE = (−0.0073 ± 0.0027) × AGB) + (0.0533 ± 0.2049), R2 = 0.52). Fifty-two percent of the NEE variance could be explained by the variance of AGB. The amount and pattern of precipitation was significantly different between the two growing seasons. In 2008, the steppe received 493 mm from May to September. In contrast, the value was 327 mm in 2009 and more than 50% of this precipitation was received in August. The alpine steppe ecosystem became a weak carbon source in June 2009 (0.48 g C m−2) due to relatively low soil volumetric water content (VWC) and the relatively high temperature. The cumulative NEE for the growing season from May to September was 63.17 and 35.51 g C m−2 in 2008 and 2009, respectively. Variations in soil moisture had important effect on carbon exchange in this alpine steppe ecosystem. Both the photosynthesis and respiration were active under high soil moisture content, and suppressed during periods of water shortage.
    Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 04/2015; 203. · 3.89 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
192 Downloads
Available from
May 30, 2014