Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting - The Current State -
Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. Circulation Journal
(Impact Factor: 3.94).
04/2012; 76(4):784-90. DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-12-0111
The optimal strategy for coronary revascularization remains controversial. Currently, most surgical revascularizations are performed with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (ONCAB), yet over the past 20 years off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has been increasingly used because of the increased awareness of the deleterious effects of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic manipulation. Small, prospective, randomized controlled trials have lacked sufficient sample size to demonstrate differences in early and long-term outcomes. Larger observational studies that are better powered to statistically compare outcomes have shown more favorable in-hospital outcomes and equivalent long-term outcomes with OPCAB and ONCAB. The benefits of OPCAB techniques may be more apparent for patients at high risk for complications associated with CPB and aortic manipulation. Recent studies have demonstrated improved outcomes in higher-risk patients undergoing OPCAB, as well as improved neurological outcomes. The purpose of this review is to outline the recent literature comparing OPCAB with ONCAB, and to demonstrate efficacy of OPCAB as a useful technique for coronary revascularization.
Available from: Audrey Borghi-Silva
- "The conventional on-pump CABG surgery (C-CABG) can be associated with a higher rate of cardiovascular events and mortality compared with off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) (Cantero et al., 2012; Chawla et al., 2012). In contrast, the OPCAB seems to result in better outcomes in elderly patients and in those with comorbidities, such as, chronic kidney disease (Demaria et al., 2002; Carrier et al., 2003; Athanasiou et al., 2004; Chawla et al., 2012; Polomsky & Puskas, 2012). However , target vessel patency as well as effectiveness and completeness of revascularization has been questioned with OPCAB (Cerqueira Neto et al., 2012; Hattler et al., 2012). "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (C-CABG) and off-pump CABG (OPCAB) surgery may produce different patients’ outcomes, including the extent of cardiac autonomic (CA) imbalance. The beneficial effects of an exercise-based inpatient programme on heart rate variability (HRV) for C-CABG patients have already been demonstrated by our group. However, there are no studies about the impact of a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on HRV behaviour after OPCAB. The aim of this study is to compare the influence of both operative techniques on HRV pattern following CR in the postoperative (PO) period. Methods
Cardiac autonomic function was evaluated by HRV indices pre- and post-CR in patients undergoing C-CABG (n = 15) and OPCAB (n = 13). All patients participated in a short-term (approximately 5 days) supervised CR programme of early mobilization, consisting of progressive exercises, from active-assistive movements at PO day 1 to climbing flights of stairs at PO day 5. ResultsBoth groups demonstrated a reduction in HRV following surgery. The CR programme promoted improvements in HRV indices at discharge for both groups. The OPCAB group presented with higher HRV values at discharge, compared to the C-CABG group, indicating a better recovery of CA function. Conclusion
Our data suggest that patients submitted to OPCAB and an inpatient CR programme present with greater improvement in CA function compared to C-CABG.
Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging 12/2013; 34(6). DOI:10.1111/cpf.12115 · 1.44 Impact Factor
Available from: Jacques Scherman
- "In the SYNTAX trial, only 15% of the patients underwent OPCAB and in the FREEDOM trial, use of cardiopulmonary bypass was left to the surgeon's discretion, with the result that only 20% patients underwent off-pump surgery . There is a compelling body of evidence that OPCAB significantly reduces cerebrovascular complications   . A propensitymatched analysis of 30-day outcomes in >42 477 consecutive primary isolated CABG patients in the STS Adult Cardiac Surgery database documented a 35% reduction in stroke for OPCAB compared to conventional CABG (OR 0.65, P = 0.001) . "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Surgical revascularization remains the standard of care for many patients. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has evolved during the past 20 years, and as such can significantly reduce the occurrence of neurological complications. While avoiding the aortic cross-clamping required in conventional on-pump techniques, OPCAB results in a lower incidence of stroke. However, clamp-related risk of stroke remains if partial or side-biting clamps are applied for proximal anastomoses. Others and we have demonstrated that no-touch 'anaortic' approaches avoiding any clamping during off-pump procedures via complete in situ grafting result in significantly reduced stroke rates when compared with partial clamping. Therefore, OPCAB in situ grafting has been proposed as the 'standard of care' to reduce neurological complications. However, this technique may not be applicable to for every patient as the use of free grafts (arterial or venous) requiring proximal anastomosis is often still necessary to achieve complete revascularization. In these situations, proximal anastomosis can be performed without a partial clamp by using the HEARTSTRING device, and over the last few years, considerable evidence has arisen supporting the impact of HEARTSTRING-enabled anastomosis to significantly minimize atheroembolism and neurological complications when compared with partial- or side-bite clamping. This paper provides a systematic overview and technical information about the combination of OPCAB and clampless strategies using the HEARTSTRING for proximal anastomosis to reduce stroke to levels reported for percutaneous coronary intervention.
Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery 06/2013; 17(3). DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivt237 · 1.16 Impact Factor
Available from: jstage.jst.go.jp
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Recognition of the significant advantages of minimizing surgical trauma has resulted in the development of minimally invasive surgical procedures. Endoscopic surgery offers patients the benefits of minimally invasive surgery, and surgical robots have enhanced the ability and precision of surgeons. Consequently, technological advances have facilitated totally endoscopic robotic cardiac surgery, which has allowed surgeons to operate endoscopically rather than through a median sternotomy during cardiac surgery. Thus, repairs for structural heart conditions, including mitral valve plasty, atrial septal defect closure, multivessel minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB), and totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), can be totally endoscopic. Robot-assisted cardiac surgery as minimally invasive cardiac surgery is reviewed.
Nippon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine 11/2011; 69 Suppl 9(4):607-11. DOI:10.5761/atcs.ra.15-00145
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.