Article

Broad Phenotypic Cross-Resistance to Elvitegravir in HIV-Infected Patients Failing on Raltegravir-Containing Regimens

Hospital Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (Impact Factor: 4.45). 03/2012; 56(6):2873-8. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.06170-11
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The failure of raltegravir (RAL) is generally associated with the selection of mutations at integrase position Y143, Q148, or N155. However, a relatively high proportion of failures occurs in the absence of these changes. Here, we report the phenotypic susceptibilities to RAL and elvitegravir (EVG) for a large group of HIV-infected patients failing on RAL-containing regimens. Plasma from HIV-infected individuals failing on RAL-containing regimens underwent genotypic and phenotypic resistance testing (Antivirogram v2.5.01; Virco). A control group of patients failing on other regimens was similarly tested. Sixty-one samples were analyzed, 40 of which belonged to patients failing on RAL-containing regimens. Full RAL susceptibility was found in 20/21 controls, while susceptibility to EVG was diminished in 8 subjects, with a median fold change (FC) of 2.5 (interquartile range [IQR], 2.1 to 3.1). Fourteen samples from patients with RAL failures showed diminished RAL susceptibility, with a median FC of 38.5 (IQR, 10.8 to 103.2). Primary integrase resistance mutations were found in 11 of these samples, displaying a median FC of 68.5 (IQR, 23.5 to 134.3). The remaining 3 samples showed a median FC of 2.5 (IQR, 2 to 2.7). EVG susceptibility was diminished in 19/40 samples from patients with RAL failures (median FC, 7.71 [IQR, 2.48 to 99.93]). Cross-resistance between RAL and EVG was high (R(2) = 0.8; P < 0.001), with drug susceptibility being more frequently reduced for EVG than for RAL (44.3% versus 24.6%; P = 0.035). Susceptibility to RAL and EVG is rarely affected in the absence of primary integrase resistance mutations. There is broad cross-resistance between RAL and EVG, which should preclude their sequential use. Resistance to EVG seems to be more frequent and might be more influenced by integrase variability.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Federico Garcia, Mar 01, 2014
1 Follower
 · 
114 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: The co-formulation of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF) is a new, investigational, once-daily (q.d.) drug, currently undergoing Phase II and III clinical trials. Next to the nucleotide/nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors FTC and TDF, it contains EVG, the second member of the HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor class, together with its pharmacokinetic booster COBI. AREAS COVERED: In this article, the authors review EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF, in addition to discussing the single-tablet regimens (STRs) containing EFV/FTC/TDF or RPV/FTC/TDF, and the investigational combination pill containing dolutegravir, lamivudine and abacavir (DTG/3TC/ABC, 572-Trii pill). A Medline review was conducted of Phase II and III trials, as well as a review of abstracts from major HIV and infectious disease conferences from 2010 to 2012, involving EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF. EXPERT OPINION: Next to the combination of EFV/FTC/TDF or RPV/FTC/TDF, the co-formulation of EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF offers a new, q.d., single-tablet alternative in treatment-naïve HIV patients. EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF combines a high efficacy with a good tolerability profile. The effect on the renal function and virologic failure with the development of resistance to two or more compounds present in EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF, requires further monitoring. STRs certainly bring the standard for HIV treatment and drug development to a higher level.
    Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 07/2012; 13(13):1969-83. DOI:10.1517/14656566.2012.712514 · 3.09 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Clinical trials of oral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) have focused on regimens of tenofovir (TDF) with or without emtricitabine (FTC). However, TDF may be associated with toxicities (renal, bone), and FTC may select for drug resistance. Both are also first-line drugs for HIV treatment. In this review, we discuss agents that might serve as alternatives to TDF/FTC for HIV PrEP. Several drug characteristics are important to consider when selecting agents for PrEP with the most critical being safety, tolerability, adequate penetration into target tissues for prevention of HIV infection, and long-lasting activity with convenient dosing. With these factors in mind, we review five potentially useful agents for PrEP. The first group includes drugs that are already Food and Drug Administration approved (maraviroc, raltegravir) with attributes that make them attractive for PrEP. The second group includes investigational agents with long-lasting activity that are being developed in parenteral form (rilpivirine-long acting, S/GSK1265744, ibalizumab). Future PrEP drugs may give clinicians the flexibility to select agents on the basis of individual patient needs and preferences.
    Current opinion in HIV and AIDS 10/2012; 7(6):600-6. DOI:10.1097/COH.0b013e328358b9ce · 4.39 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review highlights recent data on the pathways of resistance that impact the clinical activity of first-generation and second-generation integrase inhibitors. RECENT FINDINGS: Raltegravir (RAL) and elvitegravir (EVG) are highly efficacious in first-line antiretroviral therapy, with small numbers of virological failures observed in clinical trials. Durable activity in treatment-experienced patients requires a fully supportive background regimen. RAL and EVG show a low-to-moderate genetic barrier to resistance and extensive cross-resistance, which preclude their sequential use. Resistance to dolutegravir (DTG) is not selected as readily in vitro and has not emerged in studies of treatment-naïve patients to date. Both in vitro and in vivo, DTG retains activity against several RAL and EVG resistant strains, but susceptibility is variably impaired by multiple mutations within the G148 pathway, which are common after RAL or EVG failure. Cross-resistance can be partially overcome by doubling DTG dosing to twice daily, but durability of responses remains dependent on a supportive background regimen. There is variability in the integrase gene of circulating HIV strains, which does not appear to reduce drug activity, although it may influence the emergence and evolution of integrase resistance. Transmission of integrase resistance remains rare but surveillance is required. SUMMARY: Integrase inhibitors provide a potent option for the treatment of HIV infection. Drug resistance remains a challenge, which may be partially overcome by the introduction of second-generation compounds. Prompt management of RAL and EVG failure is required to prevent the accumulation of multiple resistance mutations that reduce DTG susceptibility.
    Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 10/2012; 25. DOI:10.1097/QCO.0b013e32835a1de7 · 5.03 Impact Factor
Show more