Article

Simulation of survivorship bias in observational studies on plasma to red blood cell ratios in massive transfusion for trauma

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, China.
British Journal of Surgery (Impact Factor: 5.21). 01/2012; 99 Suppl 1:132-9. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7732
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Observational studies on injured patients requiring massive transfusion have found a survival advantage associated with use of equivalent number of units of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and packed red blood cells (RBCs) compared with use of FFP based on conventional guidelines. However, a survivorship bias might have favoured the higher use of FFP because patients who died early never had the chance to receive sufficient FFP to match the number of RBC units transfused.
A Markov model using trauma data from local hospitals was constructed and various FFP transfusion scenarios were applied in Monte Carlo simulations in which the relative risk of death associated with exposure to high FFP transfusion was set at 1.00, so that the FFP : RBC ratio had no influence on mortality outcome.
Simulation results showed that the relative risk associated with exposure to high FFP transfusion was less than 1.00 (0.33-0.56 based on programmed delays in achieving an FFP : RBC ratio of 1 : 1-2), thus demonstrating a survivorship bias in favour of FFP : RBC equal to or more than 1 : 1-2 in certain observational trauma studies. This bias was directly proportional to the delay in achieving a FFP : RBC ratio of 1 : 1-2 during resuscitation.
Some observational studies comparing low and high FFP administration in injured patients requiring massive transfusion probably involve survivorship bias that inflates or creates a survival advantage in favour of a higher FFP : RBC ratio.

Full-text

Available from: Calvin S H Ng, May 22, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
100 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Uncontrollable bleeding is the major cause of possible preventable death after traumatic injury. Up to one third of patients admitted to the emergency room will develop the so-called trauma induced coagulopathy (TIC) which has been shown to be associated with massive transfusions, increased morbidity and mortality. Several recent studies contribute to our present understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of TIC. In the literature the lethal triad of trauma (hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy), dilution and hypoperfusion including the role of the protein C pathway activation are well described. Recent studies offer evidence for the mechanisms which induce TIC that include platelet dysfunction, endothelial activation/anticoagulation, hypofibrinogenaemia and hyperfibrinolysis which develop very early after traumatic injury. One of the major limitations of the current literature regarding TIC is that most data presented are associations from observational databases, and only a few prospective observational studies exist and causative aspects are only shown by haemorrhagic shock in animal models. TIC represents a complex interplay between coagulation, inflammation, and cellular dysfunction (platelets, leukocytes, and endothelium). Mechanisms include anticoagulation by the thrombinthrombomodulin protein C system, platelet dysfunction and hyperfibrinolysis. The understanding of TIC has improved immensely in recent years but many questions remain that need to be answered by other prospective studies and animal models to further define this complex syndrome.
    12/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.tacc.2014.10.006
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Collider bias, or stratifying data by a covariate consequence rather than cause (confounder) of treatment and outcome, plagues randomized and observational trauma research. Of the seven trials of prehospital hypertonic saline in dextran (HSD) that have been evaluated in systematic reviews, none found an overall between-group difference in survival, but four reported significant subgroup effects. We hypothesized that an avoidable type of collider bias often introduced inadvertently into trauma comparative effectiveness research could explain the incongruous findings.
    Injury 01/2015; 46(5). DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.043 · 2.46 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to characterize the cause of death in severely injured trauma patients to define potential responses to resuscitation. METHODS Prospective analysis of 190 critically injured patients who underwent massive transfusion protocol (MTP) activation or received massive transfusion (>10 U of packed red blood cells [RBC] per 24 hours). Cause of death was adjudicated into one of four categories as follows: (1) exsanguination, (2) early physiologic collapse, (3) late physiologic collapse, and (4) nonsurvivable injury. RESULTS A total 190 patients underwent massive transfusion or MTP with 76 deaths (40% mortality), of whom 72 deaths were adjudicated to one of four categories: 33.3% died of exsanguination, 16.6% died of early physiologic collapse, 11.1% died of late physiologic collapse, while 38.8% died of nonsurvivable injuries. Patients who died of exsanguination were younger and had the highest RBC/fresh frozen plasma ratio (2.97 [2.24]), although the early physiologic collapse group survived long enough to use the most blood products (p < 0.001). The late physiologic collapse group had significantly fewer penetrating injuries, was older, and had significantly more crystalloid use but received a lower RBC/fresh frozen plasma ratio (1.50 [0.42]). Those who were determined to have a nonsurvivable injury had a lower presenting Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, fewer penetrating injuries, and higher initial blood pressure reflecting a preponderance of nonsurvivable traumatic brain injury. The average survival time for patients with potentially survivable injuries was 2.4 hours versus 18.4 hours for nonsurvivable injuries (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Severely injured patients requiring MTP have a high mortality rate. However, no studies to date have addressed the cause of death after MTP. Characterization of cause of death will allow targeting of surgical and resuscitative conduct to allow extension of the physiologic reserve time, therefore rendering previously nonsurvivable injury potentially survivable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic study, level III.
    Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 08/2013; 75:S255-S262. DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e31829a24b4 · 1.97 Impact Factor