Article

Relationship of In Vitro Susceptibility to Moxifloxacin and In Vivo Clinical Outcome in Bacterial Keratitis

Department of Ocular Microbiology, Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, India.
Clinical Infectious Diseases (Impact Factor: 9.42). 03/2012; 54(10):1381-7. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cis189
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT For bacterial infections, the susceptibility to antibiotics in vitro has been associated with clinical outcomes in vivo, although the importance of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) has been debated. In this study, we analyzed the association of MIC on clinical outcomes in bacterial corneal ulcers, while controlling for organism and severity of disease at presentation.
Data were collected as part of a National Eye Institute-funded, randomized, controlled trial (the Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial [SCUT]). All cases enrolled in SCUT had a culture-positive bacterial corneal ulcer and received moxifloxacin. The MIC to moxifloxacin was measured by E test. Outcomes included best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, infiltrate/scar size, time to re-epithelialization, and corneal perforation.
Five hundred patients with corneal ulcers were enrolled in the trial, and 480 were included in this analysis. The most commonly isolated organisms were Streptococcus pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. A 2-fold increase in MIC was associated with an approximately 0.02 logMAR decrease in visual acuity at 3 weeks, approximately 1 letter of vision loss on a Snellen chart (0.019 logMAR; 95% confidence interval [CI], .0040-.033; P = .01). A 2-fold increase in MIC was associated with an approximately 0.04-mm larger infiltrate/scar size at 3 weeks (0.036 mm; 95% CI, .010-.061; P = .006). After controlling for organism, a higher MIC was associated with slower time to re-epithelialization (hazards ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, .86-.97; P = .005).
In bacterial keratitis, a higher MIC to the treating antibiotic is significantly associated with worse clinical outcomes, with approximately 1 line of vision loss per 32-fold increase in MIC.
NCT00324168.

0 Followers
 · 
138 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Global blindness exacts an enormous financial and social cost on developing countries. Reducing the prevalence of blindness globally requires a set of strategies that are different from those typically used in developed countries. This was the subject of the 2013 Knapp symposium at the American Ophthalmological Society Annual Meeting, and this article summarizes the presentations of epidemiologists, health care planners, and ophthalmologists. It explores a range of successful strategies from the multinational Vision 2020 Initiative to disease-specific schemes in cataract, trachoma control, infectious corneal ulceration, cytomegalovirus retinitis, and retinopathy of prematurity. In each example, the importance of an attitudinal change set toward public health becomes clear. There is reason for optimism in the struggle against global blindness in large measure because of innovative programs such as those described here.
    Jama Ophthalmology 03/2014; 132(5). DOI:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.84 · 3.83 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Purpose: To determine whether penetrating scleral or corneal injury can enhance intraocular penetration of systemic moxifloxacin, vancomycin, and ceftazidime. Methods: Thirty rabbits were divided into 3 groups for each antibiotic and then further subdivided to receive either scleral or corneal injury to the right eye. The left eye served as a control. Intravenous antibiotics were given following injury, and eyes were subsequently enucleated. Vitreous antibiotic concentration was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography analysis. Plasma concentration was measured for comparison. Results: Intravitreal moxifloxacin concentration was unchanged by injury. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC90) was achieved in the vitreous against the most common gram-positive endophthalmitis-causing organisms. Intravitreal vancomycin levels were not enhanced by injury and did not reach the MIC90 for gram-positive organisms commonly causing intraocular infection. Intravitreal ceftazidime was increased in the injured eyes, 67% and 73% higher in scleral and corneal injury eyes. It reached MIC90 of many gram-negative bacteria. Conclusions: Intravitreal antibiotic penetration of systemic antibiotics with or without penetrating ocular injury varies depending on the antibiotic. For prevention or treatment of gram-positive-bacteria-causing endophthalmitis, intravitreal vancomycin is necessary and provides the most reliable coverage. Systemic ceftazidime can be used for many gram-negative bacteria, but intravitreal injection is recommended for better coverage, especially for more-potent organisms. Systemic moxifloxacin can be considered for most gram-positive and -negative infections due to its excellent intraocular penetration and broad coverage, but the patient's previous history of its topical use and increasing resistance patterns must be considered.
    Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics 08/2014; 30(10). DOI:10.1089/jop.2014.0056 · 1.42 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bacterial keratitis is a serious ocular infectious disease that can lead to severe visual disability. Risk factors for bacterial corneal infection include contact lens wear, ocular surface disease, corneal trauma, and previous ocular or eyelid surgery. Topical antibiotics constitute the mainstay of treatment in cases of bacterial keratitis, whereas the use of topical corticosteroids as an adjunctive therapy to antibiotics remains controversial. Topical corticosteroids are usually used to control inflammation using the smallest amount of the drug. Their use requires optimal timing, concomitant antibiotics, and careful follow-up.
    Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) 10/2014; 10(10):CD005430. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD005430.pub3 · 5.70 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
68 Downloads
Available from
May 31, 2014