MR and CT Arthrography of the Knee

Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology (Impact Factor: 0.95). 02/2012; 16(1):57-68. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1304301
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT MR and CT arthrography are important imaging modalities for the assessment of the knee in certain situations. Indications for MR arthrography of the knee include assessment of the postoperative meniscus, the presence of chondral and osteochondral lesions, and the presence of intra-articular bodies. The major indication for CT arthrography is evaluating suspected internal derangement in patients who are unable to undergo MRI. In addition to reviewing the established clinical indications for MR and CT arthrography of the knee, the commonly used techniques, normal variants that can simulate disease, and the most commonly found pathologies that can be diagnosed with these modalities are discussed. Potential indications that are not currently well established in the literature including the evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament injury and autologous chondrocyte implants are examined. Where appropriate, the literature on controversial topics or diagnoses is reviewed. The use of conventional imaging versus CT and MR arthrography is also compared.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) in the elderly is one of the most common degenerative age-related joint diseases leading to typical degradation of articular cartilage with severe pain and limitation of joint motion. Its increasing prevalence due to the demographic development of the society has major implications for individual and public healthcare with the increasing necessity for clinical imaging assessment in a high number of individuals. Although conventional X-ray radiographs are widely considered as gold standard for the assessment of knee OA, in clinical and scientific settings they increasingly bare significant limitations in situations when high resolution and detailed assessment of cartilage is demanded. New imaging modalities are broadening the possibilities in knee OA clinical practice and are offering new insights to help for a better understanding of the disease. X-ray analysis in OA of the knee is associated with many technical limitations and increasingly is replaced by high-quality assessment using magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasonography both in clinical routine and scientific situations. These novel imaging modalities enable an in vivo visualization of the quality of the cartilaginous structure and bone as well as all articular and periarticular tissues. Therefore, the limitations of radiographs in knee OA assessment could be overcome by these techniques. This review article should provide an insight into the most important radiological features of knee OA and their systematic visualization with different imaging approaches that can be used in clinical routine. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.
    Gerontology 04/2014; 60(5). DOI:10.1159/000357756 · 2.68 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Articular cartilage defects are prevalent in metacarpo/metatarsophalangeal (MCP/MTP) joints of horses. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the sensitivity and specificity of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (3-T MRI) and computed tomography arthrography (CTA) to identify structural cartilage defects in the equine MCP/MTP joint. Forty distal cadaver limbs were imaged by CTA (after injection of contrast medium) and by 3-T MRI using specific sequences, namely, dual-echo in the steady-state (DESS), and sampling perfection with application-optimised contrast using different flip-angle evolutions (SPACE). Gross anatomy was used as the gold standard to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of both imaging techniques. CTA sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 and 0.96, respectively, and were significantly higher than those of MRI (0.41 and 0.93, respectively) in detecting overall cartilage defects (no defect vs. defect). The intra and inter-rater agreements were 0.96 and 0.92, respectively, and 0.82 and 0.88, respectively, for CT and MRI. The positive predictive value for MRI was low (0.57). CTA was considered a valuable tool for assessing cartilage defects in the MCP/MTP joint due to its short acquisition time, its specificity and sensitivity, and it was also more accurate than MRI. However, MRI permits assessment of soft tissues and subchondral bone and is a useful technique for joint evaluation, although clinicians should be aware of the limitations of this diagnostic technique, including reduced accuracy.
    The Veterinary Journal 10/2013; 199(1). DOI:10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.10.021 · 2.17 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patient-specific instrumentation in TKA has the proposed benefits of improving coronal and sagittal alignment and rotation of the components. In contrast, the literature is inconsistent if the use of patient-specific instrumentation improves alignment in comparison to conventional instrumentation. Depending on the manufacturer, patient-specific instrumentation is based on either MRI or CT scans. However, it is unknown whether one patient-specific instrumentation approach is more accurate than the other and if there is a potential benefit in terms of reduction of duration of surgery.
    Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 07/2014; 472(10). DOI:10.1007/s11999-014-3784-6 · 2.88 Impact Factor